Ontology-Based Approach to Context Representation and Reasoning for Managing Context-Sensitive Construction Information

Construction industry is an information-intensive industry and heavily relies on documents, including physical and virtual documentation and models, to exchange context-sensitive information among different project participants. Many research efforts have been made to help manage construction information; however, few of them considered the context-sensitive nature of the information. In this paper, the authors propose a new approach to facilitate the management of context-sensitive construction information which is stored in different textual documents. The approach addresses the context-sensitive nature of construction information by representing contexts in ontologies and using contexts as indices of the information. The approach also presents a reasoning mechanism that leverages the semantically rich features of ontologies to reason about contexts in order to evaluate their applicabilities. Two case studies were conducted and the results showed the proposed approach can effectively retrieve, classify and manage construction information. Lastly, the authors discuss the limitations of the proposed approach as well as future research directions.

[1]  Tamer E. El-Diraby,et al.  Ontology-based optimisation of knowledge management in e-Construction , 2005, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[2]  Jaeyoung Choi,et al.  An Ontology-Based Context Model in a Smart Home , 2006, ICCSA.

[3]  Marco A. Casanova,et al.  Semantic Web: Concepts, Technologies and Applications , 2007, NASA Monographs in Systems and Software Engineering.

[4]  Tao Gu,et al.  Ontology based context modeling and reasoning using OWL , 2004, IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2004. Proceedings of the Second.

[5]  Les Gasser,et al.  Methodology for the Integration of Project Documents in Model-Based Information Systems , 2005 .

[6]  Ana Carolina Salgado,et al.  Towards a Context Ontology for Geospatial Data Integration , 2006, OTM Workshops.

[7]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Using Context-Awareness And Web-Services To Enhance Construction Collaboration , 2006 .

[8]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[9]  Carlos H. Caldas,et al.  Management and analysis of unstructured construction data types , 2008, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[10]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Towards a Better Understanding of Context and Context-Awareness , 1999, HUC.

[11]  Tamer E. El-Diraby,et al.  A semantic framework to support corporate memory management in building construction , 2006 .

[12]  Harry Chen,et al.  Using OWL in a Pervasive Computing Broker , 2003, OAS.

[13]  Frank Boukamp,et al.  Ontology-based job hazard analysis support , 2009 .

[14]  Robert Haimes Document interface , 1994, INTR.

[15]  Feruzan Ay Context Modeling and Reasoning using Ontologies ( July 2007 ) , 2022 .

[16]  Jonna Häkkilä,et al.  Utilising context ontology in mobile device application personalisation , 2004, MUM '04.

[17]  Frank Boukamp,et al.  Leveraging project models for automated identification of construction safety requirements , 2007 .

[18]  Sean Bechhofer,et al.  OWL: Web Ontology Language , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[19]  Kjeld Svidt,et al.  Ontologies to Support RFID‐Based Link between Virtual Models and Construction Components , 2010, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[20]  Yimin Zhu,et al.  Capturing Implicit Structures in Unstructured Content of Construction Documents , 2007 .

[21]  Han-Hsiang Wang,et al.  A Context Ontology Development Process for Construction Safety , 2008 .

[22]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Ontology-Centered Knowledge Management Using Information Retrieval Techniques , 2006 .

[23]  Yoke-Chin Lai IT-CODE: IT in COllaborative DEsign , 2006 .

[24]  Alan D. Russell Computerized Daily Site Reporting , 1993 .

[25]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Why do tagging systems work? , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[26]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  OWL Web Ontology Language Reference-W3C Recommen-dation , 2004 .

[27]  Jiawei Han,et al.  AUTOMATED CLASSIFICATION OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DOCUMENTS , 2002 .

[28]  Carlos H. and Soibelman L. Caldas A Combined Text Mining Method To Improve Document Management In Construction Projects , 2006 .

[29]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  A semantic web primer , 2004 .

[30]  Ziga Turk,et al.  The InteliGrid platform for virtual organisations interoperability , 2007, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[31]  Burcu Akinci,et al.  Modeling of and reasoning about construction specifications to support automated defect detection , 2006 .

[32]  Frank Boukamp,et al.  A VISION FOR A FRAMEWORK TO SUPPORT MANAGEMENT OF AND LEARNING FROM CONSTRUCTION PROBLEMS , 2008 .

[33]  Johanna Völker,et al.  A Framework for Ontology Learning and Data-driven Change Discovery , 2005 .

[34]  Mansur J. Darlington,et al.  Investigating ontology development for engineering design support , 2008, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[35]  Nabil Kartam,et al.  Making Effective Use of Construction Lessons Learned in Project Life Cycle , 1996 .

[36]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Context Aware Information Delivery for On-Site Construction Operations , 2005 .

[37]  Celson Lima,et al.  Domain Taxonomy for Construction Concepts: Toward a Formal Ontology for Construction Knowledge , 2005 .

[38]  Raimar J. Scherer,et al.  Retrieval of Project Knowledge from Heterogeneous AEC Documents , 2000 .

[39]  James H. Garrett,et al.  The Context–Oriented Model: An improved Modeling Approach for Representing and Processing Design Standards , 1994 .