Uncertainty quantification and propagation with probability boxes

Abstract: in the last decade, the best estimate plus uncertainty methodologies in nuclear technology and nuclear power plant design have become a trending topic in the nuclear field. Since BEPU was allowed for licensing purposes by the most important regulator bodies, different uncertainty assessment methods have become popular, overall non-parametric methods. While non-parametric tolerance regions can be well stated and used in uncertainty quantification for licensing purposes, the propagation of the uncertainty through different codes (multi-scale, multiphysics) in cascade needs a better depiction of uncertainty than the one provided by the tolerance regions or a probability distribution. An alternative method based on the parametric or distributional probability boxes is used to perform uncertainty quantification and propagation regarding statistic uncertainty from one code to another. This method is sample-size independent and allows well-defined tolerance intervals for uncertainty quantification, manageable for uncertainty propagation. This work characterizes the distributional p-boxes behavior on uncertainty quantification and uncertainty propagation through nested random sampling.

[1]  S. S. Wilks.  Statistical Prediction with Special Reference to the Problem of Tolerance Limits , 1942 .

[2]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .

[3]  S. S. Wilks.  Determination of Sample Sizes for Setting Tolerance Limits , 1941 .

[4]  S. S. Wilks.  The Large-Sample Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio for Testing Composite Hypotheses , 1938 .

[5]  R. Engle.  Wald, likelihood ratio, and Lagrange multiplier tests in econometrics , 1984 .

[6]  P. Alam.  ‘K’ , 2021, Composites Engineering.

[7]  In Seob Hong,et al.  Generalized Tolerance Limit Evaluation Method to Determine Statistically Meaningful Minimum Code Simulations , 2008 .

[8]  P. Alam,et al.  H , 1887, High Explosives, Propellants, Pyrotechnics.

[9]  Kostadin Ivanov,et al.  BENCHMARK FOR UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS IN MODELING (UAM) FOR DESIGN, OPERATION AND SAFETY ANALYSIS OF LWRs , 2007 .

[10]  Francesco Saverio D'Auria,et al.  The Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty (BEPU) approach in licensing of current nuclear reactors , 2012 .

[11]  Robert D. Tortora,et al.  Sampling: Design and Analysis , 2000 .

[12]  Robert Youngblood,et al.  10 CFR 50.46c Rulemaking: A Novel Approach in Restating the LOCA Problem for PWRs , 2016 .

[13]  Francesco Saverio D'Auria,et al.  The technological challenge for current generation nuclear reactors , 2019, Nuclear Energy and Technology.

[14]  Marvin K. Nakayama,et al.  The use of latin hypercube sampling for the efficient estimation of confidence intervals , 2012 .

[15]  Alessandro Petruzzi,et al.  The Best-Estimate Plus Uncertainty (BEPU) challenge in the licensing of current generation of reactors , 2015, 2015 5th International Youth Conference on Energy (IYCE).

[16]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Practical representations of incomplete probabilistic knowledge , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[17]  Francesco Saverio D'Auria,et al.  Strengthening nuclear reactor safety and analysis , 2017 .

[18]  Yudi Pawitan,et al.  A Reminder of the Fallibility of the Wald Statistic: Likelihood Explanation , 2000 .

[19]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Bootstrap and Order Statistics for Quantifying Thermal-Hydraulic Code Uncertainties in the Estimation of Safety Margins , 2008 .

[20]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Propagation of Uncertainties Modelled by Parametric P-boxes Using Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansions , 2015 .

[21]  Alan D. Hutson,et al.  Calculating nonparametric confidence intervals for quantiles using fractional order statistics , 1999 .

[22]  L. L. Briggs,et al.  Uncertainty quantification approaches for advanced reactor analyses. , 2009 .

[23]  H. Meidani,et al.  Inverse uncertainty quantification using the modular Bayesian approach based on Gaussian process, Part 1: Theory , 2018, Nuclear Engineering and Design.

[24]  Mikhail Nikulin,et al.  Chi-Squared Goodness of Fit Tests with Applications , 2013 .

[25]  Turan G. Bali.  The generalized extreme value distribution , 2003 .

[26]  H. Glaeser,et al.  Best Estimate Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants: Uncertainty Evaluation. IAEA Safety Report Series , 2008 .

[27]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Constructing Probability Boxes and Dempster-Shafer Structures , 2003 .

[28]  M. Beer,et al.  The Bhattacharyya distance: Enriching the P-box in stochastic sensitivity analysis , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[29]  César Queral,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of a PWR LOCA sequence using parametric and non-parametric methods , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[30]  William Q. Meeker,et al.  Statistical Intervals: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers , 2017 .

[31]  C. F. Jeff Wu,et al.  Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization , 2000 .

[32]  Tomasz Kozlowski,et al.  Inverse uncertainty quantification using the modular Bayesian approach based on Gaussian Process, Part 2: Application to TRACE , 2018, Nuclear Engineering and Design.

[33]  PART 50—DOMESTIC LICENSING OF PRODUCTION AND UTILIZATION FACILITIES , 2010 .

[34]  Ana Sánchez,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of a large break loss of coolant accident in a pressurized water reactor using non-parametric methods , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[35]  Rudolf Beran,et al.  Interpolated Nonparametric Prediction Intervals and Confidence Intervals , 1993 .