Three-dimensional evaluation of the holographic projection in digital dental model superimposition using HoloLens device.

OBJECTIVE To assess validity and reliability of palatal superimposition of holograms of 3D digital dental models using a customized software, (Ortho Mechanics Sequential Analyzer OMSA), installed on Microsoft HoloLens device as compared to the OMSA application running on a regular computer screen. METHODS The sample consisted of pre- and post-treatment digital maxillary dental models of 20 orthodontic cases (12.3 ± 1.9 years) treated by rapid maxillary expansion (two turns per day). For each case, the pre- and post-treatment digital models were superimposed using hand gestures for marking the dental models holograms in mixed reality using the Microsoft HoloLens. The same models were then superimposed using the conventional landmark-based method with OMSA software running on a regular computer screen. The same set of dental arch parameters was measured on the superimposed 3D data by the two software versions for comparison. Agreement in the superimposition outcomes among the two superimposition methods was assessed using Dahlberg error (DE), concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) using two-way ANOVA mixed model for absolute agreement and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS Repeatability was acceptable for all variables based on the high values of CCCs over 0.99 with a lower 95% confidence limit over 0.95 for any variable. The DE ranged from 0.14 mm to 0.36 mm. The absolute error did not exceed 0.5 mm for any variable. CONCLUSION Using the depth vision capabilities of the Microsoft HoloLens, 3D digital dental models can be reliably superimposed allowing virtual assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes.

[1]  Guilherme Janson,et al.  Is there a consensus for CBCT use in Orthodontics? , 2014, Dental press journal of orthodontics.

[2]  Sameh Talaat,et al.  Reliability of linear and angular dental measurements with the OrthoMechanics Sequential Analyzer. , 2015, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  Glaucia Nize Martins Santos,et al.  Realidade aumentada como uma nova perspectiva em Odontologia: desenvolvimento de uma ferramenta complementar , 2016 .

[4]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[5]  D. D. Bruellmann,et al.  An optimized video system for augmented reality in endodontics: a feasibility study , 2012, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[6]  M. Luz,et al.  Development and Application of a New Learning Object for Teaching Operative Dentistry Using Augmented Reality. , 2015, Journal of dental education.

[7]  Taiji Sohmura,et al.  Complete 3-D reconstruction of dental cast shape using perceptual grouping , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  R. Nachabe,et al.  Surgical Navigation Technology Based on Augmented Reality and Integrated 3D Intraoperative Imaging , 2016, Spine.

[9]  Andrea Deregibus,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and measurement sensitivity of digital models for orthodontic purposes: A systematic review. , 2016, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A survey of augmented reality" Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments , 1997 .

[11]  Qingfeng Li,et al.  Effectiveness of a Novel Augmented Reality-Based Navigation System in Treatment of Orbital Hypertelorism , 2016, Annals of plastic surgery.

[12]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Real-time localization of articulated surgical instruments in retinal microsurgery , 2016, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  Sebastian Bodenstedt,et al.  A system for context-aware intraoperative augmented reality in dental implant surgery , 2014, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[14]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Image-Based Tracking of the Teeth for Orthodontic Augmented Reality , 2012, MICCAI.

[15]  Peter Janssen,et al.  Binocular depth processing in the ventral visual pathway , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  H. Yau,et al.  A novel dental implant guided surgery based on integration of surgical template and augmented reality. , 2015, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[17]  Tien-Hsin Chao,et al.  Real-time optical holographic tracking of multiple objects. , 1989, Applied optics.

[18]  Sameh Talaat,et al.  Validity and reliability of three-dimensional palatal superimposition of digital dental models , 2017, European journal of orthodontics.

[19]  Tatiana E. Savitskaya,et al.  Augmented Reality Technology in Library Practice , 2019, Bibliotekovedenie [Library and Information Science (Russia)].

[20]  J. J. Jakimowicz,et al.  Meaningful assessment method for laparoscopic suturing training in augmented reality , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[21]  Andy Cockburn,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial memory in 2D and 3D physical and virtual environments , 2002, CHI.

[22]  Yael Edan,et al.  Comparison of three different techniques for camera and motion control of a teleoperated robot. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  J. Shuhaiber,et al.  Augmented reality in surgery. , 2004, Archives of surgery.

[24]  Ming-sheng Zhu,et al.  Registration Strategy Using Occlusal Splint Based on Augmented Reality for Mandibular Angle Oblique Split Osteotomy , 2011, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[25]  Bong-Kuen Cha,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of palatal superimposition of three-dimensional digital models. , 2010, The Angle orthodontist.

[26]  Cléa Adas Saliba Garbin,et al.  Análise situacional do estágio curricular supervisionado nos cursos de graduação em Odontologia no Brasil: uma questão de interpretação , 2016 .

[27]  G Chen,et al.  Stable region for maxillary dental cast superimposition in adults, studied with the aid of stable miniscrews. , 2011, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[28]  I. Tsaur,et al.  Feasibility and safety of augmented reality-assisted urological surgery using smartglass , 2017, World Journal of Urology.

[29]  A. Johal,et al.  Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. , 2011, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[30]  A. Motta,et al.  Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review , 2015, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.