Communicating with waves between volumes: evaluating orthogonal spatial channels and limits on coupling strengths.

A rigorous method for finding the best-connected orthogonal communication channels, modes, or degrees of freedom for scalar waves between two volumes of arbitrary shape and position is derived explicitly without assuming planar surfaces or paraxial approximations. The communication channels are the solutions of two eigenvalue problems and are identical to the cavity modes of a double phase-conjugate resonator. A sum rule for the connection strengths is also derived, the sum being a simple volume integral. These results are used to analyze rectangular prism volumes, small volumes, thin volumes in different relative orientations, and arbitrary near-field volumes: all situations in which previous planar approaches have failed for one or more reasons. Previous planar results are reproduced explicitly, extending them to finite depth. Depth is shown not to increase the number of communications modes unless the volumes are close when compared with their depths. How to estimate the connection strengths in some cases without a full solution of the eigenvalue problem is discussed so that estimates of the number of usable communications modes can be made from the sum rule. In general, the approach gives a rigorous basis for handling problems related to volume sources and receivers. It may be especially applicable in near-field problems and in situations in which volume is an intrinsic part of the problem.

[1]  R. Courant,et al.  Methods of Mathematical Physics , 1962 .

[2]  G. D. Francia.  Resolving Power and Information , 1955 .

[3]  D. Slepian,et al.  Prolate spheroidal wave functions, fourier analysis and uncertainty — II , 1961 .

[4]  C. W. Barnes.  Object Restoration in a Diffraction-Limited Imaging System , 1966 .

[5]  A. Walther.  Gabor’s Theorem and Energy Transfer through Lenses , 1967 .

[6]  G. Toraldo di Francia.  Degrees of freedom of an image. , 1969, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  J. Shapiro,et al.  Optimal Power Transfer Through Atmospheric Turbulence Using State Knowledge , 1971 .

[8]  B. Roy Frieden,et al.  VIII Evaluation, Design and Extrapolation Methods for Optical Signals, Based on Use of the Prolate Functions , 1971 .

[9]  F. Gori,et al.  Shannon number and degrees of freedom of an image , 1973 .

[10]  Degrees of freedom of images in coherent and incoherent illumination , 1974 .

[11]  J H Shapiro,et al.  Normal-mode approach to wave propagation in the turbulent atmosphere. , 1974, Applied optics.

[12]  G. Guattari,et al.  Degrees of freedom of images from point-like-element pupils , 1974 .

[13]  B. Frieden,et al.  Degrees of freedom, and eigenfunctions, for the noisy image , 1974 .

[14]  R. Freeman,et al.  Adaptive laser resonator , 1977, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

[15]  J. H. Shapiro.  Imaging and optical communication through atmospheric turbulence , 1978 .

[16]  W. P. Brown,et al.  Optical resonators with phase-conjugate mirrors , 1980 .

[17]  Titus A. Beu,et al.  Prolate angular spheroidal wave functions , 1984 .

[18]  Titus A. Beu,et al.  Prolate radial spheroidal wave functions , 1984 .

[19]  D. Miller.  Huygens's wave propagation principle corrected. , 1991, Optics letters.

[20]  D. Miller.  Spatial channels for communicating with waves between volumes. , 1998, Optics letters.

[21]  David A. B. Miller,et al.  Communicating with waves between volumes: how many different spatial channels are there? , 1998, Other Conferences.

[22]  David A. B. Miller,et al.  Degrees of freedom of an electromagnetic wave , 1999, Other Conferences.

[23]  Miller,et al.  Electromagnetic degrees of freedom of an optical system , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.