Late detection of breast and colorectal cancer in Minnesota counties: an application of spatial smoothing and clustering.

Cancers detected at a later disease stage are associated with significantly higher mortality risk. Lack of uniformity in county-level cancer detection rates is thus of substantial interest to state health departments and other public health professionals. In this paper, we perform several spatial analyses of breast and colorectal cancer detection data for Minnesota counties for 1995-1997. We look for outliers and clusters in the late detection rates using a number of techniques: (i). applying various mapping schemes, (ii). smoothing the data using Bayesian methods implemented via Markov chain Monte Carlo, and (iii). applying maximum likelihood techniques to test for the presence of clusters and to identify the most likely clustersOur results suggest a fairly uniform spatial pattern in both sets of detection rates. Spatially smoothed rates did not reveal clusters of counties with significantly higher late detection risk, nor were county-level covariates (such as income, education, and race) particularly helpful in explaining the rates. However, our spatial clustering approach (using the scan statistic) did produce statistically significant clusters of counties which may indicate differences of practical importance for public health.

[1]  M Kulldorff,et al.  Geographic assessment of breast cancer screening by towns, zip codes, and census tracts. , 2000, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[2]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Hierarchical Spatio-Temporal Mapping of Disease Rates , 1997 .

[3]  Dongchu Sun,et al.  A Bivariate Bayes Method for Improving the Estimates of Mortality Rates With a Twofold Conditional Autoregressive Model , 2001 .

[4]  W. S. Robinson Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. , 1950, International journal of epidemiology.

[5]  A. Gelfand,et al.  Inequalities between expected marginal log‐likelihoods, with implications for likelihood‐based model complexity and comparison measures , 2003 .

[6]  L. Pickle,et al.  Application of a weighted head-banging algorithm to mortality data maps. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  M Kulldorff,et al.  Spatial disease clusters: detection and inference. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  N. Day,et al.  Further evidence of benefits of a (non-randomised) breast cancer screening programme: the DOM project. , 1992, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[9]  S. Piantadosi,et al.  The ecological fallacy. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  S. Shapiro,et al.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. , 1982, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  J. Habbema,et al.  Age-specific reduction in breast cancer mortality by screening: an analysis of the results of the Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York study. , 1986, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  Katherine M. Hansen,et al.  Head-banging: robust smoothing in the plane , 1991, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[13]  Adrian F. M. Smith,et al.  Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities , 1990 .

[14]  L M Schuman,et al.  The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  R. Tarone,et al.  Analysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for the Health Insurance Plan clinical trial. , 1988, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  D. Berry,et al.  Benefits and risks of screening mammography for women in their forties: a statistical appraisal. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  D. Clayton,et al.  Empirical Bayes estimates of age-standardized relative risks for use in disease mapping. , 1987, Biometrics.