Steel Design by Advanced Analysis: Material Modeling and Strain Limits

Abstract Structural analysis of steel frames is typically performed using beam elements. Since these elements are unable to explicitly capture the local buckling behavior of steel cross-sections, traditional steel design specifications use the concept of cross-section classification to determine the extent to which the strength and deformation capacity of a cross-section are affected by local buckling. The use of plastic design methods are restricted to Class 1 cross-sections, which possess sufficient rotation capacity for plastic hinges to develop and a collapse mechanism to form. Local buckling prevents the development of plastic hinges with such rotation capacity for cross-sections of higher classes and, unless computationally demanding shell elements are used, elastic analysis is required. However, this article demonstrates that local buckling can be mimicked effectively in beam elements by incorporating the continuous strength method (CSM) strain limits into the analysis. Furthermore, by performing an advanced analysis that accounts for both geometric and material nonlinearities, no additional design checks are required. The positive influence of the strain hardening observed in stocky cross-sections can also be harnessed, provided a suitably accurate stress–strain relationship is adopted; a quad-linear material model for hot-rolled steels is described for this purpose. The CSM strain limits allow cross-sections of all slenderness to be analyzed in a consistent advanced analysis framework and to benefit from the appropriate level of load redistribution. The proposed approach is applied herein to individual members, continuous beams, and frames, and is shown to bring significant benefits in terms of accuracy and consistency over current steel design specifications.

[1]  M. Crisfield A FAST INCREMENTAL/ITERATIVE SOLUTION PROCEDURE THAT HANDLES "SNAP-THROUGH" , 1981 .

[2]  J. Y. Richard Liew,et al.  Advanced inelastic analysis of frame structures , 2000 .

[3]  Wai Fah Chen,et al.  Advanced analysis for structural steel building design , 2008 .

[4]  Andrea E. Surovek Advanced Analysis in Steel Frame Design: Guidelines for Direct Second-Order Inelastic Analysis , 2012 .

[5]  Nicolas Boissonnade,et al.  Ultimate capacity of I-sections under combined loading – Part 2: Parametric studies and CSM design , 2018, Journal of Constructional Steel Research.

[6]  Seung-Eock Kim,et al.  Design guide for steel frames using advanced analysis program , 1999 .

[7]  L. Gardner,et al.  The continuous strength method for the design of hot-rolled steel cross-sections , 2018 .

[8]  Lorenzo Macorini,et al.  Formulae for Calculating Elastic Local Buckling Stresses of Full Structural Cross-sections , 2019, Structures.

[9]  L. Gardner,et al.  Hot-rolled steel and steel-concrete composite design incorporating strain hardening , 2017 .

[10]  Dana Petcu,et al.  Available rotation capacity of wide-flange beams and beam-columns Part 2. Experimental and numerical tests , 1997 .

[11]  Tak-Ming Chan,et al.  Bending strength of hot-rolled elliptical hollow sections , 2008 .

[12]  Benjamin W. Schafer,et al.  Local buckling of structural steel shapes , 2010 .

[13]  Leroy Gardner,et al.  Stress-strain curves for hot-rolled steels , 2017 .

[14]  Stephen G. Buonopane,et al.  Reliability of Steel Frames Designed with Advanced Analysis , 2006 .

[15]  Mahen Mahendran,et al.  Large-scale testing of steel frame structures comprising non-compact sections , 2000 .

[16]  Leroy Gardner,et al.  Flexural behaviour of hot-finished high strength steel square and rectangular hollow sections , 2016 .

[18]  Hao Zhang,et al.  System-based design of planar steel frames, I: Reliability framework , 2016 .

[19]  Nicholas S. Trahair,et al.  Out-of-plane advanced analysis of steel structures , 2003 .

[20]  Leroy Gardner,et al.  The continuous strength method , 2008 .