The applicability of mathematics in computational systems biology and its experimental relations

In 1966 Richard Levins argued that applications of mathematics to population biology faced various constraints which forced mathematical modelers to trade-off at least one of realism, precision, or generality in their approach. Much traditional mathematical modeling in biology has prioritized generality and precision in the place of realism through strategies of idealization and simplification. This has at times created tensions with experimental biologists. The past 20 years however has seen an explosion in mathematical modeling of biological systems with the rise of modern computational systems biology and many new collaborations between modelers and experimenters. In this paper I argue that many of these collaborations revolve around detail-driven modeling practices which in Levins’ terms trade-off generality for realism and precision. These practices apply mathematics by working from detailed accounts of biological systems, rather than from initially idealized or simplified representations. This is possible by virtue of modern computation. The form these practices take today suggest however Levins’ constraints on mathematical application no longer apply, transforming our understanding of what is possible with mathematics in biology. Further the engagement with realism and the ability to push realistic models in new directions aligns well with the epistemological and methodological views of experimenters, which helps explain their increased enthusiasm for biological modeling.

[1]  William Bechtel,et al.  Dynamic mechanistic explanation: computational modeling of circadian rhythms as an exemplar for cognitive science. , 2010, Studies in history and philosophy of science.

[2]  Ingo Brigandt,et al.  Systems Biology and the Integration of Mechanistic Explanation and Mathematical Explanation , 2013, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[3]  Wendell A Lim,et al.  Design principles of regulatory networks: searching for the molecular algorithms of the cell. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[4]  Sara Green,et al.  The Sum of the Parts: Large-Scale Modeling in Systems Biology , 2017 .

[5]  Michael E Phelps,et al.  Systems Biology and New Technologies Enable Predictive and Preventative Medicine , 2004, Science.

[6]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Modeling complexity: cognitive constraints and computational model-building in integrative systems biology , 2018, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences.

[7]  Jamie Schwendinger-Schreck,et al.  A First Course in Systems Biology , 2012, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[8]  H. Kitano,et al.  Computational systems biology , 2002, Nature.

[9]  Daniel Hoffmann.  The dawn of mathematical biology , 2015, 1511.01455.

[10]  Charles A. S. Hall,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF SEVERAL OF THE HISTORICALLY MOST INFLUENTIAL THEORETICAL MODELS USED IN ECOLOGY AND OF THE DATA PROVIDED IN THEIR SUPPORT , 1988 .

[11]  Douglas B. Kell,et al.  The methodologies of systems biology , 2007 .

[12]  E. Keller.  Making sense of life : explaining biological development with models, metaphors, and machines , 2003 .

[13]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  Computational Analysis of Biochemical Systems: A Practical Guide for Biochemists and Molecular Biologists , 2000 .

[14]  J. Stelling,et al.  Ensemble modeling for analysis of cell signaling dynamics , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  Sara Green,et al.  Philosophy of Systems Biology , 2017 .

[16]  Annamaria Carusi,et al.  Validation and variability: dual challenges on the path from systems biology to systems medicine. , 2014, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[17]  E. Voit.  Mesoscopic modeling as a starting point for computational analyses of cystic fibrosis as a systemic disease. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[18]  Sara Green,et al.  Revisiting generality in biology: systems biology and the quest for design principles , 2015 .

[19]  Fridolin Gross.  Occam’s Razor in Molecular and Systems Biology , 2019, Philosophy of Science.

[20]  William Bechtel,et al.  Network analyses in systems biology: new strategies for dealing with biological complexity , 2017, Synthese.

[21]  Alberto Marin-Sanguino,et al.  Understanding biochemical design principles with ensembles of canonical non-linear models , 2020, PloS one.

[22]  Miles MacLeod,et al.  Modeling systems-level dynamics: Understanding without mechanistic explanation in integrative systems biology. , 2015, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[23]  Jay Odenbaugh,et al.  The strategy of “The strategy of model building in population biology” , 2007 .

[24]  Melinda Bonnie Fagan,et al.  Stem cells and systems models: clashing views of explanation , 2015, Synthese.

[25]  Miles Alexander James MacLeod,et al.  Heuristic approaches to models and modeling in systems biology , 2015, Biology & Philosophy.

[26]  A. Turing.  The chemical basis of morphogenesis , 1952, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[27]  R. Levins.  The strategy of model building in population biology , 1966 .

[28]  Ulrich Krohs,et al.  Data without models merging with models without data , 2007 .

[29]  Nicholaos Jones.  Bowtie Structures, Pathway Diagrams, and Topological Explanation , 2014 .

[30]  Jane Calvert,et al.  Calculating life? Duelling discourses in interdisciplinary systems biology. , 2011, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.