Swayed by the music: Sampling bias towards musical preference distinguishes like from dislike decisions

This study investigated the interaction between sampling behavior and preference formation underlying subjective decision making for like and dislike decisions. Two-alternative forced-choice tasks were used with closely-matched musical excerpts and the participants were free to listen and re-listen, i.e. to sample and resample each excerpt, until they reached a decision. We predicted that for decisions involving resampling, a sampling bias would be observed before the moment of conscious decision for the like decision only. The results indeed showed a gradually increasing sampling bias favouring the choice (73%) before the moment of overt response for like decisions. Such a bias was absent for dislike decisions. Furthermore, the participants reported stronger relative preferences for like decisions as compared to dislike decisions. This study demonstrated distinct differences in preference formation between like and dislike decisions, both in the implicit orienting/sampling processes prior to the conscious decision and in the subjective evaluation afterwards.

[1]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[2]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Functional Imaging of Decision Conflict , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. , 2006, Psychological review.

[4]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Roles of familiarity and novelty in visual preference judgments are segregated across object categories , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Early interactions between orienting, visual sampling and decision making in facial preference , 2006, Vision Research.

[7]  D. Moore,et al.  Order Effects in Preference Judgments: Evidence for Context Dependence in the Generation of Preferences. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[8]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Assessment of connectivity patterns from multivariate time series by partial directed coherence , 2007 .

[9]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Temporal isolation of neural processes underlying face preference decisions , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Mirjam R. M. Westenberg,et al.  Response modes, decision processes and decision outcomes , 1992 .

[11]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  The time course of gaze bias in visual decision tasks , 2009 .

[12]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Information Search in Decisions From Experience , 2010, Psychological science.

[13]  J M Bland,et al.  Weighted comparison of means , 1998, BMJ.

[14]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Reason-based choice , 1993, Cognition.

[15]  Eyal M Reingold,et al.  Stimulus exposure and gaze bias: A further test of the gaze cascade model , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Petter Johansson,et al.  Failure to Detect Mismatches Between Intention and Outcome in a Simple Decision Task , 2005, Science.

[17]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  Automatic Preference Detection by Analyzing the Gaze ‘ Cascade Effect , 2006 .

[19]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Neural components underlying subjective preferential decision making , 2010, NeuroImage.

[20]  J. Edward Russo,et al.  Binary choice under instructions to select versus reject , 2004 .