High-Cost Users Among Dual Eligibles in Three Care Settings

Abstract: This study compares the expenditure patterns and characteristics of high-cost dual eligibles to normative-cost dual eligibles within institutional and community settings. Using claims records for people dually eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid in 18 California counties (n=349,433) in 2000, high-cost users in the long-stay institutional care setting spent a much higher amount and a much greater proportion of total costs in Medi-Cal (61%) but spent less proportionally in Medicare (39%) than high-cost users in the long-term community care (66% of total costs from Medicare) or episodic care (79% of total costs from Medicare) setting. Although individuals who are long-stay nursing facility residents are high-cost in the overall sample, multinomial logistic regressions revealed that the impact of diseases/conditions on high-cost status varied within each setting. These findings suggest that policymakers and providers should consider care setting as an important component when designing disease management strategies.

[1]  E. Emanuel Cost savings at the end of life. What do the data show? , 1996, JAMA.

[2]  V. Mor,et al.  The emergence of Medicare hospice care in US nursing homes , 2001, Palliative medicine.

[3]  A. Monheit,et al.  The concentration of health care expenditures, revisited. , 2001, Health affairs.

[4]  D. Mcwhirter,et al.  Designing a comprehensive care program for high-cost clients in a managed care environment. , 1996, Psychiatric services.

[5]  S. Gortmaker,et al.  High-expenditure children with Supplemental Security Income. , 1998, Pediatrics.

[6]  S. Crystal,et al.  Medical expenditures during the last year of life: findings from the 1992-1996 Medicare current beneficiary survey. , 2002, Health services research.

[7]  J. Lynn,et al.  Medicare beneficiaries' costs of care in the last year of life. , 2001, Health affairs.

[8]  R. Kruse,et al.  Effect of Do‐Not‐Resuscitate Orders on Hospitalization of Nursing Home Residents Evaluated for Lower Respiratory Infections , 2004, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[9]  Vincent G. Iannacchione,et al.  High-cost users of medical care , 1988, Health care financing review.

[10]  R T Meenan,et al.  The sensitivity and specificity of forecasting high-cost users of medical care. , 1999, Medical care.

[11]  M. Aickin,et al.  Community-Based Care and Risk of Nursing Home Placement , 2003, Medical care.

[12]  G. Anderson,et al.  Pediatric carve outs. The use of disease-specific conditions as risk adjusters in capitated payment systems. , 1997, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[13]  D. Roblin,et al.  A low-cost approach to prospective identification of impending high cost outcomes. , 1999, Medical care.

[14]  S. C. Haffer,et al.  Health Status of Dually Eligible Beneficiaries in Managed Care Plans , 2004, Health care financing review.

[15]  B. Vladeċk Where the action really is: Medicaid and the disabled. , 2003, Health affairs.

[16]  A. Nobunaga,et al.  Recent demographic and injury trends in people served by the Model Spinal Cord Injury Care Systems. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  L. Murray,et al.  MCBS Highlights: Dually Eligible Medicare Beneficiaries , 1998, Health care financing review.