Navigating pluralism: Understanding perceptions of the ecosystem services concept

[1]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environment, Power, and Society , 1972 .

[2]  C. Weiss.  The many meanings of research utilization. , 1979 .

[3]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[4]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[5]  A. Bryman.  Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[6]  P Ekins,et al.  A Framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability , 2005 .

[7]  J. Boyd,et al.  What are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standardized Environmental Accounting Units , 2006 .

[8]  David R. Thomas,et al.  A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data , 2006 .

[9]  Kristi Jackson,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo , 2007 .

[10]  Stefan Baumgärtner,et al.  Relating the Philosophy and Practice of Ecological Economics: The Role of Concepts, Models, and Case Studies in Inter- and Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research , 2008 .

[11]  E. Turnhout,et al.  The effectiveness of boundary objects: the case of ecological indicators , 2009 .

[12]  M. Sagoff.  The quantification and valuation of ecosystem services , 2011 .

[13]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Services : Exploring a Geographical Perspective , 2022 .

[14]  C. Dormann,et al.  A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead , 2011 .

[15]  Mary E. Kentula,et al.  Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice , 2012 .

[16]  Morgan M. Robertson,et al.  Ecosystem services , 2012 .

[17]  K. Chan,et al.  Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values , 2012 .

[18]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies , 2012 .

[19]  H. Joosten,et al.  Ecosystem services and ethics , 2013 .

[20]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being , 2014 .

[21]  A. Jordan,et al.  The Challenge of Embedding an Ecosystem Services Approach: Patterns of Knowledge Utilisation in Public Policy Appraisal , 2014 .

[22]  H. Keune,et al.  No Root, No Fruit - Sustainability and Ecosystem Services , 2014 .

[23]  C. Dunlop.  The Possible Experts: How Epistemic Communities Negotiate Barriers to Knowledge Use in Ecosystems Services Policy , 2014 .

[24]  Stanley T. Asah,et al.  Perception, acquisition and use of ecosystem services: Human behavior, and ecosystem management and policy implications , 2014 .

[25]  E. Mckenzie,et al.  Understanding the Use of Ecosystem Service Knowledge in Decision Making: Lessons from International Experiences of Spatial Planning , 2014 .

[26]  C. Barnaud,et al.  Deconstructing ecosystem services: Uncertainties and controversies around a socially constructed concept , 2014 .

[27]  B. Matzdorf,et al.  The relevance of the ecosystem services framework for developed countries’ environmental policies: A comparative case study of the US and EU , 2014 .

[28]  A.P.E. van Oudenhoven,et al.  UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Ecosystem Services as a Contested Concept: A Synthesis of Critique and Counter-arguments Schötter, , 2014 .

[29]  D. Lang,et al.  Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability , 2014 .

[30]  Lars Hein,et al.  Progress and challenges in the development of ecosystem accounting as a tool to analyse ecosystem capital , 2015 .

[31]  K. Brown,et al.  Reprint of "Ecosystem services concepts and approaches in conservation: Just a rhetorical tool?" , 2015 .

[32]  S. Polasky,et al.  Setting the bar: Standards for ecosystem services , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  C. Kull,et al.  The political ecology of ecosystem services , 2015 .

[34]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability , 2015 .

[35]  Jennifer Hauck,et al.  Seeing the forest and the trees: Facilitating participatory network planning in environmental governance , 2015 .

[36]  G. Daily,et al.  Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions , 2015 .

[37]  Robert Fish,et al.  What are shared and social values of ecosystems , 2015 .

[38]  Elizabeth A. Law,et al.  Making decisions for managing ecosystem services , 2015 .

[39]  N. Chettri,et al.  The evolution of ecosystem services: A time series and discourse-centered analysis , 2015 .

[40]  Sander Jacobs,et al.  How (not) to perform ecosystem service valuations: pricing gorillas in the mist , 2015 .

[41]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Insight, part of a Special Feature on Ecosystem Service Trade-offs across Global Contexts and Scales A sustainability framework for assessing trade-offs in ecosystem services , 2015 .

[42]  J. Rinne,et al.  Knowledge brokering and boundary work for ecosystem service indicators. An urban case study in Finland , 2016 .

[43]  M. Schröter,et al.  Ecosystem Services Go Beyond Money and Markets: Reply to Silvertown. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  K. Irvine,et al.  The impact of information, value-deliberation and group-based decision-making on values for ecosystem services : integrating deliberative monetary valuation and storytelling , 2016 .

[45]  M. Reed,et al.  Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions , 2016 .

[46]  J. Kenter.  Editorial: Shared, plural and cultural values , 2016 .

[47]  Rachelle K. Gould,et al.  Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  J. Kenter,et al.  Forming shared values in conservation management: An interpretive-deliberative-democratic approach to including community voices , 2016 .

[49]  Art Dewulf,et al.  What does policy-relevant global environmental knowledge do? The cases of climate and biodiversity , 2016 .

[50]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green , 2016 .

[51]  E. Bennett,et al.  Science for the sustainable use of ecosystem services , 2016, F1000Research.

[52]  Paula Antunes,et al.  Ecosystem services for water policy: insights across Europe , 2016 .

[53]  Reiko Goto,et al.  An arts-led dialogue to elicit shared, plural and cultural values of ecosystems , 2016 .

[54]  A. Church,et al.  Making space for cultural ecosystem services: Insights from a study of the UK nature improvement initiative , 2016 .

[55]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  A new valuation school: Integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions , 2016 .

[56]  Christina von Haaren,et al.  From regional environmental planning to implementation: Paths and challenges of integrating ecosystem services , 2016 .

[57]  T. Spanhove,et al.  The ecosystem service assessment challenge: Reflections from Flanders-REA , 2016 .

[58]  K. Nicholas,et al.  Identifying five different perspectives on the ecosystem services concept using Q methodology : methodological and ideological options , 2017 .

[59]  R. Mongruel,et al.  Practical application of the Ecosystem Service Approach (ESA): lessons learned and recommendations for the future , 2017 .

[60]  T. Koellner,et al.  Towards a National Ecosystem Assessment in Germany : a Plea for a Comprehensive Approach , 2017 .

[61]  Sandra Luque,et al.  Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice , 2017 .

[62]  Patrick Meire,et al.  Are ecosystem services adequately quantified , 2017 .

[63]  P. Sutton,et al.  Revisiting Ecosystem Services: Assessment and Valuation as Starting Points for Environmental Politics , 2017 .

[64]  Jyri Mustajoki,et al.  Stakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: Results from 27 case studies , 2017 .

[65]  Ioan Fazey,et al.  Knowledge needs for the operationalisation of the concept of ecosystem services , 2017 .

[66]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? , 2017 .

[67]  I. M. Bouwma,et al.  Adoption of the ecosystem services concept in EU policies , 2017 .

[68]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Researchers must be aware of their roles at the interface of ecosystem services science and policy , 2018, Ambio.

[69]  Jacqueline Loos,et al.  Refocusing ecosystem services towards sustainability , 2017 .

[70]  I. Bouwma,et al.  Barriers for the ecosystem services concept in European water and nature conservation law , 2017 .

[71]  Jennifer Hauck,et al.  The means determine the end – Pursuing integrated valuation in practice , 2017 .

[72]  Volker Mauerhofer,et al.  How do ecosystem services perform in enforceable law? Potentials and pitfalls within regional and national integration , 2017 .

[73]  Stanley T. Asah,et al.  Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach , 2017 .

[74]  Joachim Maes,et al.  Handling a messy world: Lessons learned when trying to make the ecosystem services concept operational , 2017 .

[75]  Volker Mauerhofer.  The law, ecosystem services and ecosystem functions: An in-depth overview of coverage and interrelation , 2017 .

[76]  Zita Izakovičová,et al.  Divergence and conflicts in landscape planning across spatial scales in Slovakia: An opportunity for an ecosystem services-based approach? , 2017 .

[77]  S. Polasky,et al.  Assessing nature's contributions to people , 2018, Science.

[78]  L. Braat.  Five reasons why the Science publication “Assessing nature’s contributions to people” (Diaz et al. 2018) would not have been accepted in Ecosystem Services , 2018 .

[79]  Max Nielsen-Pincus,et al.  Ecosystem Services as Boundary Objects for Transdisciplinary Collaboration , 2018 .

[80]  B. Burkhard,et al.  Ecosystem services are inclusive and deliver multiple values. A comment on the concept of nature's contributions to people , 2018 .

[81]  D. Geneletti,et al.  Integration of ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment across spatial planning scales , 2018 .

[82]  Zuzana V. Harmáčková,et al.  Welcoming different perspectives in IPBES: “Nature’s contributions to people” and “Ecosystem services” , 2018 .

[83]  Jasper Montana,et al.  Engaging diverse experts in a global environmental assessment: participation in the first work programme of IPBES and opportunities for improvement , 2018 .

[84]  J. Kenter,et al.  Ecosystem services as a post-normal field of science , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[85]  S. Broekx,et al.  Integrating Ecosystem Services values for sustainability? Evidence from the Belgium Ecosystem Services community of practice , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[86]  J. Kenter.  IPBES: Don’t throw out the baby whilst keeping the bathwater; Put people’s values central, not nature’s contributions , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[87]  Fabien Quétier,et al.  The ecosystem approach in ecological impact assessment: Lessons learned from windfarm developments on peatlands in Scotland , 2018, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[88]  R. Ballinger,et al.  Saltmarshes, ecosystem services, and an evolving policy landscape: A case study of Wales, UK , 2018 .