An Automated and Accurate Methodology to Assess Ki-67 Labeling Index of Immunohistochemical Staining Images of Breast Cancer Tissues

Automatic scoring of Ki-67 with digital image analysis would improve the accuracy of the diagnostic. However, automatic Ki-67 assessment is very challenging due to complex variations of cell characteristics. In this paper, we propose an integrated framework for accurate Ki-67 scoring. The main contributions of our method are: a robust cell detection algorithm to detect all tumor and non-tumor cells; a clustering model for computerized classification of tumor and non-tumor cells and subsequent proliferation rate scoring by quantifying Ki-67, based on classified cells which appear in breast cancer immunohistochemical images. Unlike existing Ki-67 scoring techniques, our methodology works on whole slide images (WSI) using patches that are extracted from detected tissues. As the size of each sample is so large they can not be handled as a single image. Therefore, each slide is divided into small parts and on edge tiles merging is considered to preserve the continuity of nuclei. The proposed method has been extensively evaluated on tissue microarray (TMA) whole slides, and the cell detection performance is comparable to manual annotations and is very accurate compared with the estimation of an experienced pathologist.

[1]  Vilppu J Tuominen,et al.  ImmunoRatio: a publicly available web application for quantitative image analysis of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki-67 , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[2]  A. Laenkholm,et al.  The clinical database and implementation of treatment guidelines by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group in 2007–2016 , 2018, Acta oncologica.

[3]  Mattias Rantalainen,et al.  Digital image analysis outperforms manual biomarker assessment in breast cancer , 2016, Modern Pathology.

[4]  Yun-bin Chen,et al.  Automated Ki-67 Quantification of Immunohistochemical Staining Image of Human Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Xenografts , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer working group. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  Hulya Yalcin,et al.  Automatically diagnosing HER2 amplification status for breast cancer patients using large FISH images , 2017, 2017 25th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU).

[7]  Malgorzata Lorent,et al.  Comparison of the Manual, Semiautomatic, and Automatic Selection and Leveling of Hot Spots in Whole Slide Images for Ki-67 Quantification in Meningiomas , 2015, Analytical cellular pathology.

[8]  V. Özmen Breast Cancer in Turkey: Clinical and Histopathological Characteristics (Analysis of 13.240 Patients). , 2014, The journal of breast health.

[9]  C. Chakraborty,et al.  An Advanced Deep Learning Approach for Ki-67 Stained Hotspot Detection and Proliferation Rate Scoring for Prognostic Evaluation of Breast Cancer , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Hai Su,et al.  Automatic Ki-67 Counting Using Robust Cell Detection and Online Dictionary Learning , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.