Braking from different speeds: judgments of collision speed if a car does not stop in time.

The purpose of speed limits is to keep driving speed low enough for drivers to be able to pay attention to relevant information and timely execute maneuvers so that the car can be driven in a safe way and stopped in time. If a driver violates a speed limit or drives too fast she or he will not be able to stop as quickly as from a slower speed. We asked participants to imagine that they themselves had driven a car outside a school at a speed of 30 km/h when a child suddenly had rushed into the street. From this speed it was possible to stop the car just in front of the child after braking as quickly and forcefully as possible. We then asked the participants to imagine that they drove the same street at a higher speed of 50 km/h and the child appeared at the same place as before. At what speed would the car hit the child after braking in the same way as before? This kind of problems were presented in three studies and the results showed that the judged speeds of collision were always underestimated in different hypothetical driving context scenarios by judges differing in numerical skills. This indicates an overly optimistic view on the possibilities to reduce speed quickly if the driving speed is too fast, which is an important component of attitudes towards speed limits, their legitimacy and recommended driving speeds. Further implications of the results were discussed last.

[1]  A. Marcel,et al.  Consciousness and the varieties of emotion experience: a theoretical framework. , 2002, Psychological review.

[2]  H. Simon,et al.  Models Of Man : Social And Rational , 1957 .

[3]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Springs of Action: Affective and Analytical Information Processing in Choice , 2000 .

[4]  Eyal Peer,et al.  Exploring the time-saving bias: How drivers misestimate time saved when increasing speed , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[5]  B. Lubin,et al.  Development of a measure that integrates positive and negative affect and personality: the Comprehensive Personality and Affect Scales. , 2002, Journal of clinical psychology.

[6]  P. Ubel,et al.  Measuring Numeracy without a Math Test: Development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[7]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Driving speed changes and subjective estimates of time savings, accident risks and braking , 2009 .

[8]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  R Elvik,et al.  Nilsson's Power Model connecting speed and road trauma: applicability by road type and alternative models for urban roads. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Decisions among time saving options: when intuition is strong and wrong. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[11]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Numeracy and Decision Making , 2022 .

[12]  Eyal Peer,et al.  Speeding and the time-saving bias: how drivers' estimations of time saved in higher speed affects their choice of speed. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Anna Sundström,et al.  The validity of self-reported driver competence: Relations between measures of perceived driver competence and actual driving skill , 2011 .

[14]  Göran Nilsson,et al.  Traffic Safety Dimensions and the Power Model to Describe the Effect of Speed on Safety , 2004 .

[15]  Ingrid van Schagen,et al.  Driving speed and the risk of road crashes: a review. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  O. Svenson ARE WE ALL LESS RISKY AND MORE SKILLFUL THAN OUR FELLOW DRIVERS , 1981 .