Modulations of eye movement patterns by spatial filtering during the learning and testing phases of an old/new face recognition task

In two experiments, we examined the effects of varying the spatial frequency (SF) content of face images on eye movements during the learning and testing phases of an old/new recognition task. At both learning and testing, participants were presented with face stimuli band-pass filtered to 11 different SF bands, as well as an unfiltered baseline condition. We found that eye movements varied significantly as a function of SF. Specifically, the frequency of transitions between facial features showed a band-pass pattern, with more transitions for middle-band faces (≈5–20 cycles/face) than for low-band (≈<5 cpf) or high-band (≈>20 cpf) ones. These findings were similar for the learning and testing phases. The distributions of transitions across facial features were similar for the middle-band, high-band, and unfiltered faces, showing a concentration on the eyes and mouth; conversely, low-band faces elicited mostly transitions involving the nose and nasion. The eye movement patterns elicited by low, middle, and high bands are similar to those previous researchers have suggested reflect holistic, configural, and featural processing, respectively. More generally, our results are compatible with the hypotheses that eye movements are functional, and that the visual system makes flexible use of visuospatial information in face processing. Finally, our finding that only middle spatial frequencies yielded the same number and distribution of fixations as unfiltered faces adds more evidence to the idea that these frequencies are especially important for face recognition, and reveals a possible mediator for the superior performance that they elicit.

[1]  G. Cottrell,et al.  Two Fixations Suffice in Face Recognition , 2008, Psychological science.

[2]  Philippe G Schyns,et al.  Accurate statistical tests for smooth classification images. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[3]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Interattribute Distances do not Represent the Identity of Real World Faces , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[4]  A. Pick,et al.  Discrimination of schematic faces by nursery school children. , 1974, Child development.

[5]  G. Loftus Eye fixations and recognition memory for pictures , 1972 .

[6]  Jeff P Hamm,et al.  Effects of Band-Pass Spatial Frequency Filtering of Face and Object Images on the Amplitude of N170 , 2012, Perception.

[7]  I. Craw,et al.  Spatial Content and Spatial Quantisation Effects in Face Recognition , 1994, Perception.

[8]  Nicholas Costen,et al.  One extreme or the other or perhaps the golden mean? Issues of spatial resolution in face processing , 1999 .

[9]  P. Schyns,et al.  No troubles with bubbles: a reply to Murray and Gold , 2004, Vision Research.

[10]  T. Foulsham,et al.  What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[11]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[12]  S M Luria,et al.  Comparison of Eye Movements over Faces in Photographic Positives and Negatives , 1978, Perception.

[13]  D. S. Wooding,et al.  Automatic control of saccadic eye movements made in visual inspection of briefly presented 2-D images. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[14]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Probing the human stereoscopic system with reverse correlation , 1999, Nature.

[15]  A. L. I︠A︡rbus Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .

[16]  G. Yovel,et al.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  B. Rossion The composite face illusion: A whole window into our understanding of holistic face perception , 2013 .

[18]  D. Bub,et al.  Does face inversion change spatial frequency tuning? , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  P. Bennett,et al.  Inversion Leads to Quantitative, Not Qualitative, Changes in Face Processing , 2004, Current Biology.

[20]  Jason M. Gold,et al.  Troubles with bubbles , 2004, Vision Research.

[21]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  R. Näsänen Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images , 1999, Vision Research.

[23]  Carrick C. Williams,et al.  Eye movements are functional during face learning , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[24]  P. Schyns,et al.  Receptive Fields for Flexible Face Categorizations , 2004, Psychological science.

[25]  A. L. Yarbus,et al.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967, Springer US.

[26]  Michael L. Peterson,et al.  Perception of Faces, Objects, and Scenes: Analytic and Holistic Processes (335-355) , 2006 .

[27]  C. Collin,et al.  Spatial-Frequency Thresholds for Configural and Featural Discriminations in Upright and Inverted Faces , 2010, Perception.

[28]  E. Rolls,et al.  Role of low and high spatial frequencies in the face-selective responses of neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey , 1985, Vision Research.

[29]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of face recognition in a flash: it's in the eyes , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  A. Young,et al.  Aspects of face processing , 1986 .

[31]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[32]  Jennifer J. Richler,et al.  Meanings, Mechanisms, and Measures of Holistic Processing , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[33]  A. Gale,et al.  Eye Movement Strategies Involved in Face Perception , 1977, Perception.

[34]  A. Oliva,et al.  Coarse Blobs or Fine Edges? Evidence That Information Diagnosticity Changes the Perception of Complex Visual Stimuli , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  I. Craw,et al.  Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  Stephane J. M. Rainville,et al.  The effects of spatial frequency overlap on face recognition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  B. Tjan,et al.  The Perception of a Face Is No More Than the Sum of Its Parts , 2012, Psychological science.

[38]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[39]  Michael C. Mangini,et al.  Making the ineffable explicit: estimating the information employed for face classifications , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[40]  Charles A. Collin,et al.  Effects of Image Background on Spatial-Frequency Thresholds for Face Recognition , 2006 .

[41]  Nikolaus F Troje,et al.  Face recognition is affected by similarity in spatial frequency range to a greater degree than within-category object recognition. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  R. Hari,et al.  Face recognition and cortical responses show similar sensitivity to noise spatial frequency. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[43]  F. Mast,et al.  Featural, Configural, and Holistic Face-Processing Strategies Evoke Different Scan Patterns , 2009, Perception.

[44]  David M Erceg-Hurn,et al.  Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. , 2008, The American psychologist.

[45]  M. Bindemann,et al.  Viewpoint and center of gravity affect eye movements to human faces. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[46]  John M Henderson,et al.  The face inversion effect is not a consequence of aberrant eye movements , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[47]  P. Schyns,et al.  Show Me the Features! Understanding Recognition From the Use of Visual Information , 2002, Psychological science.

[48]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Recognition of human faces from isolated facial features: A developmental study , 1966 .

[49]  D. S. Wooding,et al.  The relationship between the locations of spatial features and those of fixations made during visual examination of briefly presented images. , 1996, Spatial vision.

[50]  Jason M. Gold,et al.  Reply to Gosselin and Schyns , 2004, Vision Research.

[51]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Holistic Processing Predicts Face Recognition , 2011, Psychological science.

[52]  N. J. Cohen,et al.  Eye-movement-based memory effect: a reprocessing effect in face perception. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[53]  Stephane J. M. Rainville,et al.  Configural and Featural Discriminations Use the Same Spatial Frequencies: A Model Observer versus Human Observer Analysis , 2014, Perception.

[54]  G. Sandini,et al.  The Role of High Spatial Frequencies in Face Perception , 1983, Perception.

[55]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[56]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Diagnostic use of scale information for componential and holistic recognition. , 2003 .

[57]  Allison B Sekuler,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Not Correlated With Face-Identification Accuracy , 2010, Psychological science.

[58]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Beliefs alter holistic face processing ... if response bias is not taken into account. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[59]  Philippe G. Schyns,et al.  Efficient bubbles for visual categorization tasks , 2011, Vision Research.

[60]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[61]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Classification images: a tool to analyze visual strategies. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[62]  Q. Vuong,et al.  The Respective Role of Low and High Spatial Frequencies in Supporting Configural and Featural Processing of Faces , 2005, Perception.

[63]  Philippe G Schyns,et al.  Diagnostic recognition: task constraints, object information, and their interactions , 1998, Cognition.

[64]  J. Henderson,et al.  Do the eyes really have it? Dynamic allocation of attention when viewing moving faces. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[65]  P. Schyns,et al.  Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[66]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[67]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks , 2001, Vision Research.

[68]  A. Ahumada,et al.  Stimulus Features in Signal Detection , 1971 .

[69]  Allison B. Sekuler,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification , 2008, Vision Research.

[70]  J. Sergent Microgenesis of Face Perception , 1986 .

[71]  J. Faubert,et al.  Configural face encoding and spatial frequency information , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[72]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[73]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[74]  C. Collin,et al.  Spatial frequency thresholds for face recognition when comparison faces are filtered and unfiltered , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[75]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[76]  A. Oliva,et al.  Flexible, Diagnosticity-Driven, Rather Than Fixed, Perceptually Determined Scale Selection in Scene and Face Recognition , 1997, Perception.