Importance of Intraluminal Pressure on Hemodynamics and Vasoconstriction Responses of Stenotic Arteries

BackgroundClinical and morphological studies clearly indicate that most human coronary artery stenoses are capable of vasomotion. Variable ischemic thresholds, ischemia unrelated to work load, and variant angina further show the presence and importance of vasoconstriction in coronary artery stenosis. Despite the importance of vasoconstriction, the effect of intraluminal pressure on the hemodynamic response to vasoconstrictors has not yet been examined. Intraluminal pressure is a primary determinant of vessel size and the force opposing vasoconstriction. Accordingly, we examined the effects of intraluminal pressure on the hemodynamic response to norepinephrine (NE)-induced vasoconstriction. Methods and ResultsIn canine carotid arteries perfused with physiological salt solution, pressures at the proximal and distal ends of the artery, as well as flow, were continuously recorded. We altered intraluminal pressure using three diverse interventions: changes in perfusion pressure, decreasing distal resistance, and collaterals. In normal, nonstenotic arteries, NE decreased the external vessel diameter but did not reduce flow. Perfusion pressure changes did not affect the ED50 of the NE-diameter relation. After an intraluminal stenosis was created, NE-induced constriction decreased flow. The threshold concentration of NE needed to decrease flow decreased as the perfusion pressure decreased (38.5±17.9, 2.3±1.3, and 0.12±0.1×10−7 mol/l for 125, 100, and 75 mm Hg of perfusion pressure, respectively; p<0.05). Lowering distal resistance decreased stenotic pressure and decreased the threshold NE concentration from 5.4±1.9 to 0.34±0.2×10−7 mol/l (p<0.05), and increasing stenotic pressure with collaterals increased the threshold NE concentration from 2.6±1.4 to 7.5±4.6×10−7 mol/l (p<0.05). ConclusionsIn stenotic arteries, interventions that lowered the intraluminal pressure decreased the threshold NE concentration needed to decrease flow, and interventions that raised the intraluminal pressure increased the threshold NE concentration. This pressure-dependent constrictor sensitivity affects the vasomotor tone and is important in pathophysiology of ischemia occurring with hypotension (low perfusion pressure) or mild increase in myocardial oxygen demand (low distal arteriolar resistance). The results also suggest that collaterals, by maintaining stenotic pressure, could decrease the constrictor sensitivity and prevent ischemia.

[1]  J. Edwards,et al.  Pathology of coronary atherosclerosis. , 1971, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[2]  D. Rodbard,et al.  Simultaneous analysis of families of sigmoidal curves: application to bioassay, radioligand assay, and physiological dose-response curves. , 1978, The American journal of physiology.

[3]  B. Gilbert,et al.  Myocardial ischemia during non-cardiac surgical procedures in patients with coronary-artery disease. , 1979 .

[4]  W. Santamore,et al.  The effects of vasoconstriction on experimental coronary artery stenosis. , 1980, American heart journal.

[5]  R. Russell,et al.  Dilation of coronary artery stenoses after isosorbide dinitrate in man. , 1980, British heart journal.

[6]  J. Cohn,et al.  Effect of Coronary Arterial Pressure on Coronary Stenosis Resistance , 1980, Circulation.

[7]  P. Lichtlen,et al.  [The normal wall segment in coronary stenoses--a postmortal study (author's transl)]. , 1981, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie.

[8]  E. Bolson,et al.  Intravenous dipyridamole combined with isometric handgrip for near maximal acute increase in coronary flow in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1981, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  J. Schwartz Fixed vs nonfixed coronary stenosis: the response to a fall in coronary pressure in a canine model. , 1982, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[10]  S. Yasui,et al.  Influences of the alteration in aortic pressure on regional myocardial function and regional myocardial blood flow in partial coronary artery occlusion. , 1982, Japanese heart journal.

[11]  A. Schwartz,et al.  Hemodynamic Predictors of Myocardial Ischemia during Halothane Anesthesia for Coronary‐Artery Revascularization , 1983, Anesthesiology.

[12]  T. Takishima,et al.  Effects of Afterload Reduction on Global Left Ventricular and Regional Myocardial Functions in the Isolated Canine Heart with Stenosis of a Coronary Arterial Branch , 1983, Circulation.

[13]  J. Cohn,et al.  Effects of coronary occlusion on flow in the distribution of a neighboring stenotic coronary artery in the dog. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  G. Fein,et al.  A Canine Model of Acute Coronary Artery Stenosis: Effects of Deliberate Hypotension , 1983, Anesthesiology.

[15]  W. Santamore,et al.  Hemodynamics of human arterial stenoses. , 1985, International journal of cardiology.

[16]  C. Buffington Hemodynamic Determinants of Ischemic Myocardial Dysfunction in the Presence of Coronary Stenosis in Dogs , 1985, Anesthesiology.

[17]  Mechanism for dynamic changes in stenotic severity. , 1985, The American journal of physiology.

[18]  C. Buffington Impaired Systolic Thickening Associated with Halothane in the Presence of a Coronary Stenosis Is Mediated by Changes in Hemodynamics , 1986, Anesthesiology.

[19]  O. Hess,et al.  Vasoconstriction of stenotic coronary arteries during dynamic exercise in patients with classic angina pectoris: reversibility by nitroglycerin. , 1986, Circulation.

[20]  J. Reiber,et al.  The role of vascular wall thickening during changes in coronary artery tone , 1986 .

[21]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  Myocardial ischemia during cardiovascular surgery as detected by an ST segment trend monitoring system. , 1987, Journal of cardiothoracic anesthesia.

[22]  ARE REGIONAL WALL MOTION ABNORMALITIES DETECTED BY TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY TRIGGERED BY ACUTE CHANGES IN SUPPLY AND DEMAND , 1988 .

[23]  W. Santamore,et al.  Mutual interaction of vasoconstriction and endothelial damage in stenotic arteries. , 1989, The American journal of physiology.

[24]  W. Santamore,et al.  Stenotic amplification of vasoconstriction responses. , 1989, The American journal of physiology.

[25]  P. Stone Triggers of transient myocardial ischemia: circadian variation and relation to plaque rupture and coronary thrombosis in stable coronary artery disease. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.