Coal cleaning using jig and response surface approach for determination of quality of clean coal

ABSTRACT Beneficiation of −10 + 3 mm size coking coal was carried out in three intermediate-size fractions: 10 + 6.73 mm, −6.73 + 4.73 mm, and −4.73 + 3 mm. Laboratory model Denver jig was used for the experiments with a target ash content of less than 17% in the clean coal product. Particle size, bed height, and jigging time were considered as process variables to analyze their effect on the performance of jig in terms of ash content of clean coal. Design of experiment was carried out using Taguchi approach which uses standard orthogonal arrays for forming a matrix of experiments. Influence of operating variables of the jig on responses was presented and discussed in 2D response surface plots. The model thus developed from the experimental results was found to be significant within the range of parameters under investigation with correlation of coefficient values as 0.99 for ash content. The ash content in the clean coal was found to be less than 17% for coals of less than about 5 mm, bed height about 40 mm. An increase in the jigging time was found to affect the performance only in the top layers of jig bed up to about 40 mm thick.

[1]  Stanislaw Cierpisz,et al.  MONITORING OF COAL SEPARATION IN A JIG USING A RADIOMETRIC DENSITY METER , 2016 .

[2]  S. K. Biswal,et al.  Statistical optimization study of jigging process on beneficiation of fine size high ash Indian non-coking coal , 2016 .

[3]  B. A. Wills,et al.  Mineral Processing Technology: An Introduction to the Practical Aspects of Ore Treatment and Mineral Recovery , 1988 .

[4]  Farhang Sereshki,et al.  Investigation of different coal types effect on the overall plant recovery , 2014 .

[5]  H. Ucbeyiay Hydrophobic flocculation and Box–Wilson experimental design for beneficiating fine coal , 2013 .

[6]  Carlos Hoffmann Sampaio,et al.  Wall effects on particle separation in air jigs , 2016 .

[7]  Avimanyu Das,et al.  Analysis of separation response of Kelsey centrifugal jig in processing fine coal , 2013 .

[8]  Alok Tripathy,et al.  Application of artificial neural network to study the performance of jig for beneficiation of non-coking coal , 2012 .

[9]  İ. Sönmez,et al.  Optimization of coal flocculation with an anionic flocculant using a box-wilson statistical design method , 2014 .

[10]  P. Walklate,et al.  A history of gravity separation at Richards Bay Minerals , 2006 .

[11]  M. Çelik,et al.  Effect of fluidizing characteristics on upgrading of lignitic coals in gravity based air jig , 2014 .

[12]  İbrahim Sönmez,et al.  Application of the Box-Wilson experimental design method for the spherical oil agglomeration of coal , 2006 .

[13]  Achyut K. Panda,et al.  Optimization of Process Parameters by Taguchi Method: Catalytic degradation of polypropylene to liquid fuel , 2013 .

[14]  Rick Honaker,et al.  Altair jig: an in-plant evaluation for fine coal cleaning , 2002 .

[15]  S. Cierpisz,et al.  Control of coal separation in a jig using a radiometric meter , 2016 .

[16]  J. Douglas Barrett,et al.  Taguchi's Quality Engineering Handbook , 2007, Technometrics.

[17]  Aaron Noble,et al.  A review of state-of-the-art processing operations in coal preparation , 2015 .

[18]  Kejun Dong,et al.  Numerical simulation of the in-line pressure jig unit in coal preparation , 2010 .

[19]  N. Aslan,et al.  Application of Box-Behnken design and response surface methodology for modeling of some Turkish coals , 2007 .

[20]  H. J. Steiner A contribution to the theory of jigging, Part I: Similarity criteria of the motion of jig layers , 1996 .

[21]  M. Li,et al.  A Study of Coal Washing Spirals , 1993 .