IntelliArm: An exoskeleton for diagnosis and treatment of patients with neurological impairments

This paper presents a novel 7 (active) +2 (passive) degrees of freedom (DOF) exoskeleton to achieve effective rehabilitation of upper limbs with neurological impairment. The 7+2 DOF robot was designed for allowing anatomically correct motions in the upper extremity, and for measuring 18 axis forces/torques and 9 DOF positions. A novel four-step integrated rehabilitation approach was developed and tested including (1) accurate and quantitative diagnosis which is not practical to do during manual clinical examinations or with existing robotic devices; (2) strenuous stretching of spastic joints based on the diagnosis and with intelligent control to adjust the stretching velocity constantly according to the joint conditions; (3) voluntary movement exercise to perform realistic functional tasks based on the patient-specific diagnosis, and (4) outcome evaluations which assessed the treatment outcome quantitatively with multiple physiological measures.

[1]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Passive ankle dorsiflexion increases in patients after a regimen of tilt table-wedge board standing. A clinical report. , 1985, Physical therapy.

[2]  M. Bax,et al.  CONTRACTURES AND THEIR THERAPY , 1985, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[3]  P. Celnik,et al.  Stroke Rehabilitation. , 2015, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[4]  John J. Craig,et al.  Introduction to Robotics Mechanics and Control , 1986 .

[5]  D. Wade,et al.  Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  M. Dam,et al.  The Effects of Long‐term Rehabilitation Therapy on Poststroke Hemiplegic Patients , 1993, Stroke.

[7]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand , 1995, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[8]  S. Olney,et al.  Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part II: Recovery and physical therapy , 1996 .

[9]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot‐aided functional imaging: Application to a motor learning study , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[10]  W. Rymer,et al.  Guidance-based quantification of arm impairment following brain injury: a pilot study. , 1999, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  H. F. Machiel van der Loos,et al.  Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  Li-Qun Zhang,et al.  Intelligent stretching of ankle joints with contracture/spasticity , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  W. Harwin,et al.  The effect of GENTLE/s robot mediated therapy on upper extremity function post stroke , 2003 .

[14]  E. Roth,et al.  Biomechanic changes in passive properties of hemiplegic ankles with spastic hypertonia. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  R. Riener,et al.  ARMin - design of a novel arm rehabilitation robot , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[16]  Joel C. Perry,et al.  Real-Time Myoprocessors for a Neural Controlled Powered Exoskeleton Arm , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Robert Riener,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[18]  R. Riener,et al.  ARMin - Exoskeleton for Arm Therapy in Stroke Patients , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[19]  Hyung-Soon Park,et al.  Developing an Intelligent Robotic Arm for Stroke Rehabilitation , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.