The pedagogical quality of MOOCs based on a systematic review of JCR and Scopus publications (2013-2015)

MOOCs are seen as the latest devel­ opment in online learning and since their launch in 2008 they have become an inte­ gral part of university course curricula. We are currently at an early stage in the deve­ lopment of MOOCs; few studies have been published on their assessment so far. Con­ sequently, this paper is based on a literature review, using the main academic databases JCR and Scopus, on 33 articles published bet­ ween 2013 and 2015 with the objective of de­ termining the educational quality of MOOCs. The methodology is based on a literature review procedure in which seven categories were distinguished when carrying out the analysis: course planning, contents, metho­ dology, resources and activities, motivation, communication, and assessment and certifi­ cation. The results of this study show that the assessment of the quality of MOOCs refers to a slightly higher than average quality, except for the three variables of content, resources and activities, and assessment. However, it warns of a lack of studies that assess the peda­ gogical quality of MOOCs and so we suggest further studies are needed with greater meth­ odological rigour to obtain conclusive results.

[1]  Javier P. Gisbert,et al.  ¿Cómo realizar, evaluar y utilizar revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis? , 2004 .

[2]  Albert Sangrà,et al.  Metaanálisis de la investigación sobre mooc en el período 2013-2014 , 2015 .

[3]  Mauro Mediavilla Bordalejo,et al.  El efecto de las TIC en la adquisición de competencias. Un análisis por tipo de centro educativo , 2016 .

[4]  Óscar Martín Rodríguez,et al.  Propuesta de evaluación de la calidad de los MOOCs a partir de la Guía Afortic , 2013 .

[5]  Jose Luis Salmeren Silvera,et al.  Comparative between quality assessment tools for MOOCs: ADECUR vs Standard UNE 66181: 2012 , 2015, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

[6]  María del Mar Sánchez Vera,et al.  Beyond objective testing and peer assessment: alternative ways of assessment in MOOCs , 2015 .

[7]  R. Martínez,et al.  El uso de las TIC en el ocio y la formación de los jóvenes vulnerables , 2016 .

[8]  Carlos Manuel Castaño Garrido,et al.  Diseño, motivación y rendimiento en un curso MOOC cooperativo , 2015 .

[9]  Ray-I Chang,et al.  Survey of learning experiences and influence of learning style preferences on user intentions regarding MOOCs , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[10]  Marion Waite,et al.  Learning in a Small, Task-Oriented, Connectivist MOOC: Pedagogical Issues and Implications for Higher Education. , 2013 .

[11]  Pao-Ta Yu,et al.  A Near-Reality Approach to Improve the e-Learning Open Courseware , 2013, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[12]  Antònia Darder Mesquida,et al.  Online tutoring procedure for research project supervision: management, organization and key elements , 2015 .

[13]  E. Acosta,et al.  Motivación en la educación masiva online. Desarrollo y experimentación de un sistema de acreditaciones para los MOOC. , 2014 .

[14]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Vanessa Allom,et al.  Active behaviour change safety interventions in the construction industry: A systematic review , 2015 .

[16]  Julio Sánchez-Meca Cómo realizar una revisión sistemática y un meta-análisis* , 2010 .

[17]  E. Redondo Governance in educational institutions in Portugal , 2016 .

[18]  Judith Ramsay,et al.  Massive open online courses (MOOCs): Insights and challenges from a psychological perspective , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  Albert Sangrà,et al.  MOOC Design Principles. A Pedagogical Approach from the Learner"s Perspective , 2013 .

[20]  María Soledad Ramírez Montoya,et al.  Self-motivation challenges for student involvement in the Open Educational Movement with MOOC , 2015, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

[21]  Hangjung Zo,et al.  Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[22]  John Daniel,et al.  The Future of MOOCs: Adaptive Learning or Business Model? , 2015, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

[23]  Yong Chen,et al.  Investigating MOOCs through Blog Mining. , 2014 .

[24]  Paul Diver,et al.  MOOCs as a massive research laboratory: opportunities and challenges , 2015 .

[25]  Eloy López Meneses,et al.  Comparative between quality assessment tools for MOOCs: ADECUR vs Standard UNE 66181: 2012 , 2015 .

[26]  George Veletsianos,et al.  Digging deeper into learners' experiences in MOOCs: Participation in social networks outside of MOOCs, notetaking and contexts surrounding content consumption , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[27]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  A Cluster Analysis of MOOC Stakeholder Perspectives , 2015, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

[28]  Pin-Ju Chen,et al.  MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Shirley Williams,et al.  MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012 , 2013 .

[30]  L. Graham,et al.  Impact of an open online course on the connectivist behaviours of Alaska teachers , 2015 .

[31]  F. Pina,et al.  Factores que influyen en los enfoques de aprendizaje universitario. Una revisión sistemática , 2014 .

[32]  Manuela Raposo-Rivas,et al.  A Study on the Pedagogical Components of Massive Online Courses Un estudio sobre los componentes pedagógicos de los cursos online masivos , 2015 .

[33]  Ignacio Aguaded,et al.  EL IMPACTO BIBLIOMÉTRICO DEL MOVIMIENTO MOOC EN LA COMUNIDAD CIENTÍFICA ESPAÑOLA , 2016 .

[34]  John Morgan,et al.  Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[35]  Cristóbal Suárez Guerrero,et al.  Evaluación de la calidad pedagógica de los MOOC , 2014 .

[36]  José Luis Salmerón Silvera,et al.  EDUTOOL ® : UN INSTRUMENTO PARA LA EVALUACIÓN Y ACREDITACIÓN DE LA CALIDAD DE LOS MOOCS , 2015 .

[37]  Rosabel Roig Vila,et al.  Validación del Cuestionario de evaluación de la calidad de cursos virtuales adaptado a MOOC , 2015 .