Designs for Systems to Support Collaborative Information Behavior

There are several reasons for humans to work together. For one, sometimes a problem is just too complex for a single individual to tackle. Denning & Yaholkovsky (2008) regard such problems as “messy” or “wicked” and argue that collaboration is essential for resolving such messes. When it comes to accessing or processing some information, it seems that in many situations, multiple people working together will be able to do a better job than any one of them individually, given that they have appropriate tools. For instance, Olson et al. (1993) developed ShrEdit, a shared text editor. To their surprise, they discovered that the groups working with ShrEdit generated fewer design ideas, but apparently better ones. They believed their tool helped the supported groups keep more focused on the core issues in the emerging design, to waste less time on less important topics, and to capture what was said as they went. Despite the importance of collaboration in many situations, there is a lack of support for people working to collaborate on information ABsTRAcT

[1]  Raya Fidel,et al.  A multidimensional approach to the study of human-information interaction: A case study of collaborative information retrieval , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Diane H. Sonnenwald,et al.  Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process , 1996 .

[3]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Collaborative information retrieval (CIR) , 2000, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[4]  W. Pratt,et al.  Collaborative information synthesis I: A model of information behaviors of scientists in medicine and public health , 2006 .

[5]  LiechtiOlivier Awareness and the WWW , 2000 .

[6]  N. Roberts,et al.  Stakeholder Collaboration and Innovation: A Study of Public Policy Initiation at the State Level , 1991 .

[7]  J. Foster Collaborative information seeking and retrieval , 2006 .

[8]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  A model for understanding collaborative information behavior in context: A study of two healthcare teams , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[9]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  Collaborative information seeking: The combined activity of information seeking and collaborative grounding , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[10]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Groupwork close up: a comparison of the group design process with and without a simple group editor , 1993, TOIS.

[11]  Yasuyuki Sumi,et al.  Editorial: Awareness and the WWW , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[13]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  Collaborative video searching on a tabletop , 2007, Multimedia Systems.

[14]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Collaborative Information Retrieval in an information-intensive domain , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[15]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Small Group Design Meetings: An Analysis of Collaboration , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Getting to "we" , 2008, CACM.

[17]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  An Empirical Study of Problematic Internet Use and Self-Esteem , 2011, Int. J. Cyber Behav. Psychol. Learn..

[18]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Designing for e-science: Requirements gathering for collaboration in CiteSeer , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Tom Rodden,et al.  A Survey of CSCW Systems , 1991, Interact. Comput..

[20]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Intelligent Information Sharing Systems , 1986 .