Using network flow modeling to determine pig flow in a commercial production system

Abstract The systematic approach to raising pigs in a multi-site production system, in terms of where the pigs are housed and how long they are fed, is generally called pig flow. This complex process is most often approached in a segmented fashion, not looking at all barns at the same time in relation to each other. Linear programming, the basis of most nutritional formulation packages and logistics services, provides a mathematical means for characterizing pig flow that allows a producer to look at the entire flow of pigs in a system at the same time. We describe a teaching model that provides the foundation to characterize pig flow in a commercial production system. The teaching model is built in Microsoft Excel ® and incorporates key components of production such as growth rate, mortality, stocking density, seasonality, packer grid pricing, and marketing. The results from this teaching model are sound and provide the foundation for a larger model that is needed for full implementation within a production system, proving this model behaves as expected. The generalizability of the model and its assumptions allows for the inclusion of more barns, a more precise measure of time, and the ability to change the assumptions utilized in this teaching scenario, which are needed for direct application in a production system.

[1]  A. Lurette,et al.  Modelling batch farrowing management within a farrow-to-finish pig herd: influence of management on contact structure and pig delivery to the slaughterhouse. , 2008, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[2]  J. DeRouchey,et al.  Evaluating the removal of pigs from a group and subsequent floor space allowance on the growth performance of heavy-weight finishing pigs. , 2016, Journal of animal science.

[3]  R. Bruce Curry,et al.  Agricultural Systems modeting and Simulation , 1997 .

[4]  E Kebreab,et al.  A multilevel nonlinear mixed-effects approach to model growth in pigs. , 2010, Journal of animal science.

[5]  Supachai Pathumnakul,et al.  Pig procurement plan considering pig growth and size distribution , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[6]  J. Patience,et al.  Impact of piglet birth weight, birth order, and litter size on subsequent growth performance, carcass quality, muscle composition, and eating quality of pork. , 2010, Journal of animal science.

[7]  W. Marsh,et al.  How to use partial budgets to predict the impact of implementing segregated early weaning in a swine herd , 1999 .

[8]  N. Li Using a Stochastic Model to Evaluate Swine Production Management with Paylean® IV: Return of Accurate Sorting for Marketing , 2003 .

[9]  S. Curtis,et al.  Effects of proportion of pigs removed from a group and subsequent floor space on growth performance of finishing pigs. , 2005, Journal of animal science.

[10]  J. Patience,et al.  Variation in the Finishing Barn , 2006 .

[11]  Jarkko K. Niemi,et al.  The value of precision feeding technologies for grow–finish swine , 2010 .

[12]  Cliff T. Ragsdale,et al.  Spreadsheet Modeling and Decision Analysis: A Practical Introduction to Management Science , 2003 .

[13]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  Linear Programming and Network Flows , 1977 .

[14]  H W Gonyou,et al.  Application of broken-line analysis to assess floor space requirements of nursery and grower-finisher pigs expressed on an allometric basis. , 2006, Journal of animal science.