A regression approach to testing genetic influence on communication behavior: Social media use as an example

A behavior genetics perspective suggests both social and biological forces influence human behavior, including highly specialized media and communication behaviors. In this paper, I use a behavior genetics framework and twin study data from the 2013 Midlife in the United States (MIDUS III) survey to examine how both environmental and genetic factors contribute to social media use. By applying a straightforwardand easily replicableanalytical extension to linear regression called DeFries-Fulker (DF) regression, I demonstrate that approximately one-to two-thirds of variance in social media use is attributable to additive genetic traits; unique and shared environmental factors account for the remainder of variance. In addition to showing social media use is partially motivated by underlying genetic traits, this paper, more importantly, provides an analytical blueprint for using DF regression in future investigations of genetic influence on communication behaviors and media effects. DeFries-Fulker (DF) regression is used to assess genetic influence on social media use.One-to two-thirds of variance in social media use is explained by genetic traits.Genes are shown to play a latent role in guiding complex media behaviors.This article offers a blueprint for exploring other genetic effects using DF regression.

[1]  Michael J. Beatty,et al.  What can we learn from the study of twins about genetic and environmental influences on interpersonal affiliation, aggressiveness, and social anxiety?: a meta-analytic study , 2002 .

[2]  John P. Wanous,et al.  Estimating the Reliability of a Single-Item Measure , 1996 .

[3]  C. Horvath.  Biological Origins of Communicator Style. , 1995 .

[4]  Kevin B. Smith,et al.  Predisposed: Liberals, Conservatives, and the Biology of Political Differences , 2014, Politics and the Life Sciences.

[5]  E. Katz,et al.  On the use of the mass media for important things. , 1973 .

[6]  A. Anastasi.  Individual differences. , 2020, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  G. Miller,et al.  The Heritability and Genetic Correlates of Mobile Phone Use: A Twin Study of Consumer Behavior , 2012, Twin Research and Human Genetics.

[8]  S. Wright,et al.  Systems of Mating. I. the Biometric Relations between Parent and Offspring. , 1921, Genetics.

[9]  Michael J. Beatty,et al.  It's in our nature: Verbal aggressiveness as temperamental expression , 1997 .

[10]  Ömer Faruk Ursavas,et al.  Intrapair Similarity of Computer Self-Efficacy in Turkish Adolescent Twins , 2016 .

[11]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Uses and Gratifications of Social Media: A Comparison of Facebook and Instant Messaging , 2010 .

[12]  L. Eaves,et al.  Genetic and Environmental Influences on Smoking Behavior across Adolescence and Young Adulthood in the Virginia Twin Study of Adolescent Behavioral Development and the Transitions to Substance Abuse Follow-Up , 2015, Twin Research and Human Genetics.

[13]  Kevin B. Smith,et al.  Not by Twins Alone: Using the Extended Family Design to Investigate Genetic Influence on Political Beliefs , 2010 .

[14]  S. Valenzuela,et al.  Socialized for News Media Use: How Family Communication, Information-Processing Needs, and Gratifications Determine Adolescents’ Exposure to News , 2019, Commun. Res..

[15]  A. Shehata.  News Habits Among Adolescents: The Influence of Family Communication on Adolescents’ News Media Use—Evidence From a Three-Wave Panel Study , 2016 .

[16]  Michael J. Beatty,et al.  Communication apprehension as temperamental expression: A Communibiological paradigm , 1998 .

[17]  J. Rossiter,et al.  The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item versus Single-Item Measures of the Same Constructs , 2007 .

[18]  Andrew T. Perrin.  Social Media Usage: 2005-2015 , 2015 .

[19]  J. Cappella.  The Biological Origins of Automated Patterns of Human Interaction , 1991 .

[20]  Louis Leung,et al.  Gratifications, Collective Self-Esteem, Online Emotional Openness, and Traitlike Communication Apprehension as Predictors of Facebook Uses , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[21]  John L. Sherry.  Media Effects Theory and the Nature/Nurture Debate: A Historical Overview and Directions for Future Research , 2004 .

[22]  J. P. Wanous,et al.  Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures? , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Michael C. Neale,et al.  A test of the equal-environment assumption in twin studies of psychiatric illness , 1993, Behavior genetics.

[24]  J. Rodgers,et al.  DF-Analyses of Heritability with Double-Entry Twin Data: Asymptotic Standard Errors and Efficient Estimation , 2000, Behavior genetics.

[25]  Esther Thorson,et al.  Do parents still model news consumption? Socializing news use among adolescents in a multi-device world , 2018, New Media Soc..

[26]  J. Defries,et al.  DeFries–Fulker and Pearson–Aitken Model-fitting Analyses of Reading Performance Data from Selected and Unselected Twin Pairs , 2008, Behavior genetics.

[27]  R. Fisher.  XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance. , 1919, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.

[28]  John Raacke,et al.  MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[29]  John L. Sherry.  Toward an etiology of media use motivations: the role of temperament in media use , 2001 .

[30]  Joseph N. Cappella,et al.  Why Biological Explanation , 1996 .

[31]  E. Katz.  Mass Communications Research and the Study of Popular Culture: An Editorial Note on a Possible Future for This Journal , 1959 .

[32]  Chance York,et al.  Youth Antecedents to News Media Consumption , 2015 .

[33]  Michael Friedman,et al.  Developing brief scales for use in clinical practice: the reliability and validity of single-item self-report measures of depression symptom severity, psychosocial impairment due to depression, and quality of life. , 2006, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[34]  Weijun Wang,et al.  Journal of Systems and Information Technology , 2015 .

[35]  Pavica Sheldon,et al.  Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Leman Pinar Tosun.  Motives for Facebook use and expressing "true self" on the Internet , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  Deniz Deryakulu,et al.  Genetic and environmental influences on problematic Internet use: A twin study , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  D. Rowe,et al.  Familial influences on television viewing and aggression: A sibling study , 1986 .

[39]  James H. Fowler,et al.  Genetic Variation in Political Participation , 2008, American Political Science Review.

[40]  Michael J. Beatty,et al.  A Twins study of communicative adaptability: Heritability of individual differences , 2001 .

[41]  P. T. Dinesen,et al.  The Danish Political Twin Study: Political Traits in Danish Twins and the General Population , 2012, Twin Research and Human Genetics.

[42]  H. Kohler,et al.  Reformulating and Simplifying the DF Analysis Model , 2005, Behavior genetics.

[43]  Kevin M. Beaver,et al.  Revisiting the Association Between Television Viewing in Adolescence and Contact With the Criminal Justice System in Adulthood , 2016, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[44]  J. Rodgers,et al.  A simple algebraic demonstration of the validity of DeFries-Fulker analysis in unselected samples with multiple kinship levels , 1994, Behavior genetics.

[45]  P. Visscher,et al.  Nature Genetics Advance Online Publication , 2022 .

[46]  Abraham Maslow,et al.  Uses and Gratifications , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[47]  Michael C. Neale,et al.  Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families , 1992 .

[48]  N. Martin,et al.  The Genetic and Environmental Foundations of Political, Psychological, Social, and Economic Behaviors: A Panel Study of Twins and Families , 2015, Twin Research and Human Genetics.

[49]  N L Segal,et al.  “Sources of Human Psychological Differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart” (1990), by , 2018 .

[50]  R. Plomin.  Behavioral genetics. , 1991, Research publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease.

[51]  Martin Johnson,et al.  Human Communication Research Issn 0360-3989 Genetic and Environmental Influences on Media Use and Communication Behaviors , 2022 .

[52]  Hermine H Maes,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of twin studies including measures of the shared environment. , 2005, Child development.

[53]  Francis T. McAndrew,et al.  Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex, and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[54]  J. Blumler.  Uses and Gratifications Research , 2019, The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies.

[55]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Being Immersed in Social Networking Environment: Facebook Groups, Uses and Gratifications, and Social Outcomes , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[56]  Kevin B. Smith,et al.  OLS is AOK for ACE: A Regression-Based Approach to Synthesizing Political Science and Behavioral Genetics Models , 2013 .

[57]  D. Fulker,et al.  Multiple regression analysis of twin data , 1985, Behavior genetics.

[58]  Lena Osterhagen.  Adaptation And Natural Selection A Critique Of Some Current Evolutionary Thought , 2016 .

[59]  Adrian C. North,et al.  The uses and gratifications of using Facebook music listening applications , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[60]  M. Perri,et al.  Single-Item Vs Multiple-Item Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life , 1991, Psychological reports.

[61]  R. Plomin,et al.  Individual Differences in Television Viewing in Early Childhood: Nature as Well as Nurture , 1990 .

[62]  Gina Masullo Chen,et al.  Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[63]  S. Medland,et al.  Political Science, Biometric Theory, and Twin Studies: A Methodological Introduction , 2009, Political Analysis.

[64]  Pamela J. Shoemaker,et al.  Hardwired for News: Using Biological and Cultural Evolution to Explain the Surveillance Function , 1996 .

[65]  R. Plomin,et al.  Nature and nurture during infancy and early childhood: Conclusions , 1988 .

[66]  L. Penrose,et al.  THE CORRELATION BETWEEN RELATIVES ON THE SUPPOSITION OF MENDELIAN INHERITANCE , 2022 .

[67]  C. Ferguson,et al.  The Influence of Heritability, Neuroticism, Maternal Warmth and Media Use on Disordered Eating Behaviors: A Prospective Analysis of Twins , 2012, Psychiatric Quarterly.

[68]  J. Felson,et al.  What can we learn from twin studies? A comprehensive evaluation of the equal environments assumption. , 2014, Social science research.

[69]  Michael J. Beatty,et al.  The communibiological perspective: Implications for communication in instruction , 2000 .

[70]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  Eysenck's BIG THREE and communication traits: three correlational studies , 2001 .