Conflict of interest disclosure and the polarisation of scientific communities

In this article, we introduce and define the notion of polarised scientific communities. We show how polarisation may generate genuine conflicts of interest that require specific efforts to be identified and reported, and suggest a simple heuristic for the identification and reporting of the polarisation of research. We use examples from the debates about breast cancer screening and the prescription of statins to people at low risk of heart disease.

[1]  Ann Rudinow Sætnan,et al.  Challenges of informed choice in organised screening , 2008, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[2]  黄亚明(整理),et al.  ICMJE , 2012 .

[3]  D. Altman,et al.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[4]  P. Gøtzsche,et al.  Breast screening: the facts—or maybe not , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  Frank van Kolfschooten Conflicts of interest: Can you believe what you read? , 2002, Nature.

[6]  V. Sharpe Science, bioethics, and the public interest: on the need for transparency. , 2002, The Hastings Center report.

[7]  Fiona Godlee Statins and The BMJ , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  P. Gøtzsche,et al.  Informed choice requires information about both benefits and harms , 2009, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[9]  J. Ziman The continuing need for disinterested research , 2002, Science and engineering ethics.

[10]  Ana Marusic,et al.  Uniform format for disclosure of competing interests in ICMJE journals. , 2010, Annals of internal medicine.

[11]  J. Zarocostas UN launches humanitarian appeal for Gaza , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  P. Gøtzsche Mammography screening: truth, lies, and controversy , 2012, The Lancet.