Applied horizontal force increases impact loading in reduced-gravity running.

The chronic exposure of astronauts to microgravity results in structural degradation of their lower limb bones. Currently, no effective exercise countermeasure exists. On Earth, the impact loading that occurs with regular locomotion is associated with the maintenance of bone's structural integrity, but impact loads are rarely experienced in space. Accurately mimicking Earth-like impact loads in a reduced-gravity environment should help to reduce the degradation of bone caused by weightlessness. We previously showed that running with externally applied horizontal forces (AHF) in the anterior direction qualitatively simulates the high-impact loading associated with downhill running on Earth. We hypothesized that running with AHF at simulated reduced gravity would produce impact loads equal to or greater than values experienced during normal running at Earth gravity. With an AHF of 20% of gravity-specific body weight at all gravity levels, impact force peaks increased 74%, average impact loading rates increased 46%, and maximum impact loading rates increased 89% compared to running without any AHF. In contrast, AHF did not substantially affect active force peaks. Duty factor and stride frequency decreased modestly with AHF at all gravity levels. We found that running with an AHF in simulated reduced gravity produced impact loads equal to or greater than those experienced at Earth gravity. An appropriate AHF could easily augment existing partial gravity treadmill running exercise countermeasures used during spaceflight and help prevent musculoskeletal degradation.

[1]  R. Kram,et al.  Metabolic cost of generating horizontal forces during human running. , 1999, Journal of applied physiology.

[2]  John B. West,et al.  Historical Perspectives: Physiology in microgravity , 2000 .

[3]  V R Edgerton,et al.  Musculoskeletal adaptations to weightlessness and development of effective countermeasures. , 1996, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  H. Frost,et al.  Perspectives: Some Roles of Mechanical Usage, Muscle Strength, and the Mechanostat in Skeletal Physiology, Disease, and Research , 1998, Calcified Tissue International.

[5]  E. Howley,et al.  EFFECTS OF GRADE RUNNING ON KINEMATICS AND IMPACT FORCE , 1984 .

[6]  R. Whalen,et al.  Musculoskeletal adaptation to mechanical forces on Earth and in space. , 1993, The Physiologist.

[7]  H. Frost,et al.  A determinant of bone architecture. The minimum effective strain. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  H. Singer An Historical Perspective , 1995 .

[9]  A. J. van den Bogert,et al.  Direct dynamics simulation of the impact phase in heel-toe running. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  J. Donelan,et al.  Exploring dynamic similarity in human running using simulated reduced gravity. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  J. Vernikos Human physiology in space. , 1996, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[12]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  Simulating reduced gravity: a review of biomechanical issues pertaining to human locomotion. , 1993, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[13]  R. Kram,et al.  The independent effects of gravity and inertia on running mechanics. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  J. Klein-Nulend,et al.  MECHANOTRANSDUCTION IN BONE : ROLE OF THE LACUNOCANALICULAR NETWORK , 1999 .

[15]  A. Goldberger A course in econometrics , 1991 .

[16]  L. Lanyon,et al.  Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  R. Kram,et al.  Mechanics of running under simulated low gravity. , 1991, Journal of applied physiology.

[18]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  A biomechanical perspective on exercise countermeasures for long term spaceflight. , 1992, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[19]  V A Convertino,et al.  Exercise as a countermeasure for physiological adaptation to prolonged spaceflight. , 1996, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  B. Nigg,et al.  The effect of muscle stiffness and damping on simulated impact force peaks during running. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  L. Suva,et al.  Microgravity: a Possible Mechanism for Bone Remodeling Alterations in Skeletal Perfusion with Simulated , 2022 .

[22]  L E Lanyon,et al.  Using functional loading to influence bone mass and architecture: objectives, mechanisms, and relationship with estrogen of the mechanically adaptive process in bone. , 1996, Bone.

[23]  R. Kram,et al.  Walking in simulated reduced gravity: mechanical energy fluctuations and exchange. , 1999, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  W L Haskell,et al.  Exercise-training protocols for astronauts in microgravity. , 1989, Journal of applied physiology.

[25]  J. Donelan,et al.  Force treadmill for measuring vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces. , 1998, Journal of applied physiology.

[26]  D B Burr,et al.  In vivo measurement of human tibial strains during vigorous activity. , 1996, Bone.

[27]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  Evaluation of a Treadmill with Vibration Isolation and Stabilization (TVIS) for use on the International Space Station. , 1999, Journal of applied biomechanics.