Toward Quantitative Small Animal Pinhole SPECT: Assessment of Quantitation Accuracy Prior to Image Compensations

PurposeWe assessed the quantitation accuracy of small animal pinhole single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) under the current preclinical settings, where image compensations are not routinely applied.ProceduresThe effects of several common image-degrading factors and imaging parameters on quantitation accuracy were evaluated using Monte-Carlo simulation methods. Typical preclinical imaging configurations were modeled, and quantitative analyses were performed based on image reconstructions without compensating for attenuation, scatter, and limited system resolution.ResultsUsing mouse-sized phantom studies as examples, attenuation effects alone degraded quantitation accuracy by up to −18% (Tc-99m or In-111) or −41% (I-125). The inclusion of scatter effects changed the above numbers to −12% (Tc-99m or In-111) and −21% (I-125), respectively, indicating the significance of scatter in quantitative I-125 imaging. Region-of-interest (ROI) definitions have greater impacts on regional quantitation accuracy for small sphere sources as compared to attenuation and scatter effects. For the same ROI, SPECT acquisitions using pinhole apertures of different sizes could significantly affect the outcome, whereas the use of different radii-of-rotation yielded negligible differences in quantitation accuracy for the imaging configurations simulated.ConclusionsWe have systematically quantified the influence of several factors affecting the quantitation accuracy of small animal pinhole SPECT. In order to consistently achieve accurate quantitation within 5% of the truth, comprehensive image compensation methods are needed.

[1]  Martin G Pomper,et al.  Translational molecular imaging for cancer , 2005, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[2]  Benjamin M. W. Tsui,et al.  Pinhole SPECT With Different Data Acquisition Geometries: Usefulness of Unified Projection Operators in Homogeneous Coordinates , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  E C Frey,et al.  The importance and implementation of accurate 3D compensation methods for quantitative SPECT. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  B. Hasegawa,et al.  Attenuation correction of small animal SPECT images acquired with /sup 125/I-iodorotenone , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[5]  D. Alvarez-Fischer,et al.  Quantitative [123I]FP-CIT pinhole SPECT imaging predicts striatal dopamine levels, but not number of nigral neurons in different mouse models of Parkinson's disease , 2007, NeuroImage.

[6]  W. Oertel,et al.  Quantitative [(123)I]FP-CIT pinhole SPECT imaging predicts striatal dopamine levels, but not number of nigral neurons in different mouse models of Parkinson's disease. , 2007, NeuroImage.

[7]  Hiroshi Watabe,et al.  Evaluation of penetration and scattering components in conventional pinhole SPECT: phantom studies using Monte Carlo simulation. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Frans van der Have,et al.  The pinhole: gateway to ultra-high-resolution three-dimensional radionuclide imaging , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  P. Acton,et al.  Quantitative imaging of myocardial infarct in rats with high resolution pinhole SPECT , 2006, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[10]  R Weissleder,et al.  Molecular imaging. , 2009, Radiology.

[11]  P. Acton,et al.  Quantification of dopamine transporters in the mouse brain using ultra-high resolution single-photon emission tomography , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[12]  Benjamin M W Tsui,et al.  Integration of SimSET photon history generator in GATE for efficient Monte Carlo simulations of pinhole SPECT. , 2008, Medical physics.

[13]  Donald W. Wilson,et al.  Quantitative analysis of acute myocardial infarct in rat hearts with ischemia-reperfusion using a high-resolution stationary SPECT system. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  S. Meikle,et al.  Small animal SPECT and its place in the matrix of molecular imaging technologies , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Quantitative small field-of-view pinhole SPECT imaging: initial evaluation , 1995 .

[16]  C Lartizien,et al.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  P. Acton,et al.  Occupancy of dopamine D2 receptors in the mouse brain measured using ultra-high-resolution single-photon emission tomography and [123I]IBF , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  E C Frey,et al.  Quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography: basics and clinical considerations. , 1994, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[19]  M G Pomper,et al.  Molecular imaging: an overview. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[20]  Eric C Frey,et al.  Development of a 4-D digital mouse phantom for molecular imaging research. , 2004, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.