A double branching model for earthquake occurrence

[1] The purpose of this work is to put forward a double branching model to describe the spatiotemporal earthquake occurrence. The model, applied to two worldwide catalogs in different time-magnitude windows, shows a good fit to the data, and its earthquake forecasting performances are superior to what was obtained by the ETAS (first-step branching model) and by the Poisson model. The results obtained also provide interesting insights about the physics of the earthquake generation process and the time evolution of seismicity. In particular, the so-called background seismicity, i.e., the catalog after removing short-time clustered events, is described by a further (second-step model) branching characterized by a longer time-space clustering that may be due to long-term seismic interaction. Notably, this branching highlights a long-term temporal evolution of the seismicity that is never taken into account in seismic hazard assessment or in the definition of reference seismicity models for a large earthquake occurrence. Another interesting issue is related to the parameters of the short-term clustering that appear constant in a different magnitude window, supporting some sort of universality for the generating process.

[1]  Lapo Boschi,et al.  Global postseismic deformation: Deep earthquakes , 2000 .

[2]  H. Kanamori,et al.  A moment magnitude scale , 1979 .

[3]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Accuracy of modern global earthquake catalogs , 2003 .

[4]  Javier F. Pacheco,et al.  Seismic moment catalog of large shallow earthquakes, 1900 to 1989 , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[5]  A. Frankel.  Mapping Seismic Hazard in the Central and Eastern United States , 1995 .

[6]  Y. Kagan,et al.  Probabilistic forecasting of earthquakes , 2000 .

[7]  L. Adamopoulos.  Cluster models for earthquakes: Regional comparisons , 1976 .

[8]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  Postseismic relaxation theory on the spherical earth , 1992 .

[9]  J. Chéry,et al.  Postseismic stress transfer explains time clustering of large earthquakes in Mongolia , 2001 .

[10]  G. King,et al.  Stress Triggering of the 1994 M = 6.7 Northridge, California, Earthquake by Its Predecessors , 1994, Science.

[11]  F. Pollitz,et al.  Viscosity of oceanic asthenosphere inferred from remote triggering of earthquakes , 1998, Science.

[12]  W. Marzocchi,et al.  Exploring the evolution of a volcanic seismic swarm: The case of the 2000 Izu Islands swarm , 2006 .

[13]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  Fault interaction and stress triggering of twentieth century earthquakes in Mongolia , 2003 .

[14]  T. Utsu.  A statistical study on the occurrence of aftershocks. , 1961 .

[15]  P. Segall,et al.  Postseismic deformation following the 1906 San Francisco earthquake , 2000 .

[16]  A. Hawkes.  Point Spectra of Some Mutually Exciting Point Processes , 1971 .

[17]  L. Knopoff,et al.  Statistical Short-Term Earthquake Prediction , 1987, Science.

[18]  David A. Rhoades,et al.  Long-range Earthquake Forecasting with Every Earthquake a Precursor According to Scale , 2004 .

[19]  A. Barka,et al.  The 17 August 1999 Izmit Earthquake , 1999, Science.

[20]  Jian Lin,et al.  Change in Failure Stress on the Southern San Andreas Fault System Caused by the 1992 Magnitude = 7.4 Landers Earthquake , 1992, Science.

[21]  S. P. Nishenko,et al.  A generic recurrence interval distribution for earthquake forecasting , 1987 .

[22]  James H. Dieterich,et al.  Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering , 1997 .

[23]  Antonio Piersanti,et al.  Postseismic deformation in Chile: Constraints on the asthenospheric viscosity , 1999 .

[24]  Yosihiko Ogata,et al.  Detecting fluid signals in seismicity data through statistical earthquake modeling , 2005 .

[25]  Antonio Piersanti,et al.  Global postseismic rebound of a viscoelastic Earth: Theory for finite faults and application to the 1964 Alaska earthquake , 1997 .

[26]  A. Ziv.  Foreshocks, aftershocks, and remote triggering in quasi‐static fault models , 2003 .

[27]  L. Faenza,et al.  A non‐parametric hazard model to characterize the spatio‐temporal occurrence of large earthquakes; an application to the Italian catalogue , 2003 .

[28]  Peter Buhlmann.  Boosting Methods: Why They Can Be Us eful for High-Dimensional Data , 2003 .

[29]  W. Marzocchi,et al.  Long-Term Influence of Giant Earthquakes: Backward Empirical Evidence and Forward Test , 2008 .

[30]  H. Kanis,et al.  On Validation , 1994 .

[31]  L. Faenza,et al.  Probability map of the next M ≥ 5.5 earthquakes in Italy , 2004 .

[32]  Warner Marzocchi,et al.  Evidence of clustering and nonstationarity in the time distribution of large worldwide earthquakes , 2007 .

[33]  C. Cornell.  Engineering seismic risk analysis , 1968 .

[34]  D. Vere-Jones,et al.  Stochastic Declustering of Space-Time Earthquake Occurrences , 2002 .

[35]  Y. Ogata.  Space-Time Point-Process Models for Earthquake Occurrences , 1998 .

[36]  Matthew C. Gerstenberger,et al.  Real-time forecasts of tomorrow's earthquakes in California , 2005, Nature.

[37]  Y. Kagan,et al.  Long‐term probabilistic forecasting of earthquakes , 1994 .

[38]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Seismic Gap Hypothesis: Ten years after , 1991 .

[39]  J. Wolfowitz,et al.  Non-parametric Statistical Inference , 1949 .

[40]  Stuart P. Nishenko,et al.  Seismic gaps and plate tectonics: Seismic potential for major boundaries , 1979 .

[41]  Vladimir Kossobokov,et al.  TESTING EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION ALGORITHMS : STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT ADVANCE PREDICTION OF THE LARGEST EARTHQUAKES IN THE CIRCUM-PACIFIC, 1992-1997 , 1999 .

[42]  Alvaro Corral.  Long-term clustering, scaling, and universality in the temporal occurrence of earthquakes. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[43]  D. Sornette,et al.  Apparent clustering and apparent background earthquakes biased by undetected seismicity , 2005, physics/0501049.

[44]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Long-term earthquake clustering , 1991 .

[45]  Earthquake forecasting and its verification , 2005, cond-mat/0508476.

[46]  I. Sacks,et al.  Triggering and inhibition of great Japanese earthquakes: the effect of Nobi 1891 on Tonankai 1944, Nankaido 1946 and Tokai , 2003 .

[47]  E. Casarotti,et al.  Postseismic stress diffusion in Chile and South Peru , 2003 .

[48]  Massimo Cocco,et al.  Fault interaction by elastic stress changes: New clues from earthquake sequences , 2001 .

[49]  Yoav Freund,et al.  Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm , 1996, ICML.

[50]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An introduction to the bootstrap , 1993 .

[51]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Seismic gaps and earthquakes , 2003 .

[52]  W. Marzocchi,et al.  Variations of southern California seismicity: Empirical evidence and possible physical causes , 2005 .

[53]  E. Boschi,et al.  On the long‐term interaction among earthquakes: Some insight from a model simulation , 2003 .

[54]  Y. Ogata.  Seismicity Analysis through Point-process Modeling: A Review , 1999 .

[55]  Filippos Vallianatos,et al.  Basic principles for evaluating an earthquake prediction method , 1996 .

[56]  W. Ellsworth,et al.  Seismicity Remotely Triggered by the Magnitude 7.3 Landers, California, Earthquake , 1993, Science.

[57]  Antonio Piersanti,et al.  Global post-seismic deformation , 1995 .

[58]  Yuzo Toya,et al.  Is Background Seismicity Produced at a Stationary Poissonian Rate , 2000 .

[59]  F. Papangelou.  Integrability of expected increments of point processes and a related random change of scale , 1972 .

[60]  Daryl J. Daley,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes , 2013 .

[61]  Tom Parsons,et al.  Global Omori law decay of triggered earthquakes: Large aftershocks outside the classical aftershock zone , 2002 .

[62]  S. K. Singh,et al.  Space–Time Clustering of Large Thrust Earthquakes along the Mexican Subduction Zone: An Evidence of Source Stress Interaction , 2005 .

[63]  J. Rundle,et al.  A systematic test of time-to-failure analysis , 1998 .

[64]  Y. Kagan.  Short-Term Properties of Earthquake Catalogs and Models of Earthquake Source , 2004 .

[65]  Yuji Yagi,et al.  Coseismic and postseismic stress changes in a subducting plate: Possible stress interactions between large interplate thrust and intraplate normal‐faulting earthquakes , 2002 .

[66]  Y. Ogata,et al.  The Centenary of the Omori Formula for a Decay Law of Aftershock Activity , 1995 .

[67]  Mark Simons,et al.  Temporal clustering of major earthquakes along individual faults due to post-seismic reloading , 2004 .

[68]  Warner Marzocchi.  Comment on “Layered Seismogenic Source Model and Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analyses in Central Italy” by Bruno Pace, Laura Peruzza, Giusy Lavecchia, and Paolo Boncio , 2007 .

[69]  S. Wiemer,et al.  Earthquake Likelihood Model Testing , 2007 .

[70]  J. Chéry,et al.  A Physical Basis for Time Clustering of Large Earthquakes , 2001 .

[71]  Warner Marzocchi,et al.  On the Validation of Earthquake-Forecasting Models: The Case of Pattern Recognition Algorithms , 2003 .

[72]  Yosihiko Ogata,et al.  Statistical Models for Earthquake Occurrences and Residual Analysis for Point Processes , 1988 .

[73]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  New seismic gap hypothesis: Five years after , 1995 .

[74]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .