How Proteins Bind Macrocycles

The potential utility of synthetic macrocycles as drugs, particularly against low druggability targets such as protein-protein interactions, has been widely discussed. There is little information, however, to guide the design of macrocycles for good target protein-binding activity or bioavailability. To address this knowledge gap we analyze the binding modes of a representative set of macrocycle-protein complexes. The results, combined with consideration of the physicochemical properties of approved macrocyclic drugs, allow us to propose specific guidelines for the design of synthetic macrocycles libraries possessing structural and physicochemical features likely to favor strong binding to protein targets and also good bioavailability. We additionally provide evidence that large, natural product derived macrocycles can bind to targets that are not druggable by conventional, drug-like compounds, supporting the notion that natural product inspired synthetic macrocycles can expand the number of proteins that are druggable by synthetic small molecules.

[1]  Philippe Roche,et al.  2P2Idb: a structural database dedicated to orthosteric modulation of protein–protein interactions , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  A. Hopkins,et al.  The druggable genome , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[4]  John P. Overington,et al.  ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  Elizabeth A. Villar,et al.  Comprehensive experimental and computational analysis of binding energy hot spots at the NF-κB essential modulator/IKKβ protein-protein interface. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[6]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[7]  HO NOOOMeOMeMeMeOOHMeOMeMeOOOHMeOOOHOHMeMe,et al.  Macrocycles in new drug discovery , 2008 .

[8]  Stephen R. Johnson,et al.  Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[9]  É. Marsault,et al.  Macrocycles are great cycles: applications, opportunities, and challenges of synthetic macrocycles in drug discovery. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[10]  Fabrizio Giordanetto,et al.  Macrocyclic drugs and clinical candidates: what can medicinal chemists learn from their properties? , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[11]  Wolfgang Brandt,et al.  Chemoinformatic analysis of biologically active macrocycles. , 2010, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[12]  Leslie Z. Benet,et al.  Predicting Drug Disposition via Application of BCS: Transport/Absorption/ Elimination Interplay and Development of a Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System , 2004, Pharmaceutical Research.

[13]  Laurie E. Grove,et al.  Structural conservation of druggable hot spots in protein–protein interfaces , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  Peter Buchwald,et al.  Small‐molecule protein–protein interaction inhibitors: Therapeutic potential in light of molecular size, chemical space, and ligand binding efficiency considerations , 2010, IUBMB life.

[16]  A. Ganesan The impact of natural products upon modern drug discovery. , 2008, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[17]  Adrian Whitty,et al.  The resurgence of covalent drugs , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[18]  Christopher L. McClendon,et al.  Reaching for high-hanging fruit in drug discovery at protein–protein interfaces , 2007, Nature.

[19]  Dianqing Sun,et al.  Macrocyclic Drugs and Synthetic Methodologies toward Macrocycles , 2013, Molecules.

[20]  S. Korsmeyer,et al.  Activation of Apoptosis in Vivo by a Hydrocarbon-Stapled BH3 Helix , 2004, Science.

[21]  Ludger A. Wessjohann,et al.  What can a chemist learn from nature’s macrocycles? – A brief, conceptual view , 2005, Molecular Diversity.

[22]  Alessandro Pedretti,et al.  Assessing drug-likeness--what are we missing? , 2008, Drug discovery today.

[23]  T. Berg Small-molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions. , 2008, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[24]  Paul N. Mortenson,et al.  Diverse, high-quality test set for the validation of protein-ligand docking performance. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[25]  R. Lokey,et al.  Form and function in cyclic peptide natural products: a pharmacokinetic perspective. , 2013, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[26]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  Robust Identification of Binding Hot Spots Using Continuum Electrostatics: Application to Hen Egg-White Lysozyme , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[27]  P. Hajduk,et al.  A decade of fragment-based drug design: strategic advances and lessons learned , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[28]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  Relationship between Hot Spot Residues and Ligand Binding Hot Spots in Protein-Protein Interfaces , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[29]  T. Blundell,et al.  Probing hot spots at protein-ligand binding sites: a fragment-based approach using biophysical methods. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[30]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  Fragment-based identification of druggable 'hot spots' of proteins using Fourier domain correlation techniques , 2009, Bioinform..

[31]  S. Gellman,et al.  Targeting protein-protein interactions: lessons from p53/MDM2. , 2007, Biopolymers.

[32]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  Hot Spot Analysis for Driving the Development of Hits into Leads in Fragment-Based Drug Discovery , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[33]  C. Lipinski Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability. , 2000, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[34]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  Binding hot spots and amantadine orientation in the influenza a virus M2 proton channel. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[35]  Yizhong Zhang,et al.  On-resin N-methylation of cyclic peptides for discovery of orally bioavailable scaffolds , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[36]  H. Riedwyl Goodness of Fit , 1967 .

[37]  P. Hajduk,et al.  Druggability indices for protein targets derived from NMR-based screening data. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[38]  Yizhong Zhang,et al.  Optimizing PK properties of cyclic peptides: the effect of side chain substitutions on permeability and clearance(). , 2012, MedChemComm.

[39]  W. Delano Unraveling hot spots in binding interfaces: progress and challenges. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[40]  Brooke N. Bullock,et al.  Plucking the high hanging fruit: a systematic approach for targeting protein-protein interactions. , 2013, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[41]  B. Honig,et al.  On the nature of cavities on protein surfaces: Application to the identification of drug‐binding sites , 2006, Proteins.

[42]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  Identification of hot spots within druggable binding regions by computational solvent mapping of proteins. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[43]  P. Hajduk Fragment-based drug design: how big is too big? , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[44]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  Asymptotic Theory of Certain "Goodness of Fit" Criteria Based on Stochastic Processes , 1952 .

[45]  Ilya Kagan,et al.  Between a Rock and a Hard Place , 2016, Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association.

[46]  T. Blundell,et al.  Using a Fragment-Based Approach To Target Protein–Protein Interactions , 2013, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[47]  L. Pearl,et al.  Structural basis for inhibition of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone by the antitumor antibiotics radicicol and geldanamycin. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[48]  A. Hopkins,et al.  Ligand efficiency: a useful metric for lead selection. , 2004, Drug discovery today.

[49]  Philippe Roche,et al.  Chemical and structural lessons from recent successes in protein-protein interaction inhibition (2P2I). , 2011, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[50]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  Analysis of binding site hot spots on the surface of Ras GTPase. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[51]  Ian A. Watson,et al.  Characteristic physical properties and structural fragments of marketed oral drugs. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[52]  W. L. Jorgensen The Many Roles of Computation in Drug Discovery , 2004, Science.

[53]  Stephen P. Hale,et al.  The exploration of macrocycles for drug discovery — an underexploited structural class , 2008, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[54]  David Ozonoff,et al.  Novel Druggable Hot Spots in Avian Influenza Neuraminidase H5N1 Revealed by Computational Solvent Mapping of a Reduced and Representative Receptor Ensemble , 2008, Chemical biology & drug design.