Epicardial vs. transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillators in children

Abstract Aims The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has been increasingly used in children. Both epicardial and transvenous approaches are used, with controversy regarding the best option with no specific recommendations. We aimed to compare outcomes associated with epicardial vs. transvenous ICDs in children. Methods and results Data were analysed from a retrospective study including all patients <18-year-old implanted with an ICD in a tertiary centre from 2003 to 2021. Outcomes were compared between epicardial and transvenous ICDs. A total of 122 children with an ICD (mean age 11.5 ± 3.8 years, 57.4% males) were enrolled, with 84 (64.1%) epicardial ICDs and 38 (29.0%) transvenous ICDs. Early (<30 days) ICD-related complications were reported in 17 (20.2%) patients with an epicardial ICD vs. 0 (0.0%) with a transvenous ICD (P = 0.002). Over a mean follow-up of 4.8 ± 4.0 years, 25 (29.8%) patients with an epicardial ICD and 9 (23.7%) patients with a transvenous ICD experienced at least one late ICD-related complication [hazard ratio (HR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8–4.0]. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead dysfunction occurred in 19 (22.6%) patients with an epicardial ICD vs. 3 (7.9%) with a transvenous ICD (HR 5.7, 95% CI 1.3–24.5) and was associated with a higher incidence of ICD-related reintervention (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.3–7.0). After considering potential confounders, especially age and weight at implantation, this association was no longer significant (P = 0.112). The freedom from ICD lead dysfunction was greater in patients with pleural coils than in those with epicardial coils (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15–0.96). Conclusion In children, after a consideration of patient characteristics at implantation, the burden of complications and ICD lead dysfunction appears to be similar in patients with epicardial and transvenous devices. Pleural coils seem to be associated with better outcomes than epicardial coils in this population. Clinical Trial Registration NCT05349162.

[1]  J. Triedman,et al.  2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients. , 2021, Heart rhythm.

[2]  J. Triedman,et al.  2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients , 2021, Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal.

[3]  M. Schwerzmann,et al.  2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease. , 2020, European heart journal.

[4]  C. Morillo,et al.  2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS focused update to 2015 expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing , 2020, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[5]  C. Morillo,et al.  2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS focused update to 2015 expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing. , 2020, Heart rhythm.

[6]  K. Iijima,et al.  Replacement of an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) with a New Standard Subcutaneous ICD System in a Patient with Jervell and Lange-Nielsen Syndrome. , 2019, International heart journal.

[7]  Stephanie Fuller,et al.  2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  T. Paul,et al.  Transvenous and non-transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in children, adolescents, and adults with congenital heart disease: who is at risk for appropriate and inappropriate shocks? , 2018, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[9]  C. Balmer,et al.  Health-Related Quality of Life and Psychological Adjustment of Children and Adolescents with Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: A Systematic Review , 2018, Pediatric Cardiology.

[10]  T. Paul,et al.  Efficacy and safety of non-transvenous cardioverter defibrillators in infants and young children , 2018, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[11]  K. Minges,et al.  Characteristics and Outcomes of Pediatric Patients Who Undergo Placement of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry , 2018, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[12]  R. Weber,et al.  Long-term outcome of epicardial implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems in children: results justify its preference in paediatric patients , 2018, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  F. Drago,et al.  Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: is it ready for use in children and young adults? A single-centre study , 2018, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[14]  P. Friedman,et al.  Selecting the right defibrillator in the younger patient: Transvenous, epicardial or subcutaneous? , 2018, International journal of cardiology.

[15]  M. Ackerman,et al.  Minimally invasive epicardial implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement for infants and children: An effective alternative to the transvenous approach. , 2016, Heart rhythm.

[16]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Implantation of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with retroperitoneal generator placement in a child with hypoplastic left heart syndrome , 2015, HeartRhythm case reports.

[17]  J. Curtis,et al.  Implant and Clinical Characteristics for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Patients in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Registry , 2014, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[18]  J. Morgan,et al.  Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in paediatric practice: a single-centre UK experience with focus on subcutaneous defibrillation. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[19]  B. Marino,et al.  Cardiac rhythm devices in the pediatric population: utilization and complications. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[20]  J. Triedman,et al.  System survival of nontransvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators compared to transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients. , 2010, Heart rhythm.

[21]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[22]  R. Prêtre,et al.  Epicardial and pleural lead ICD systems in children and adolescents maintain functionality over 5 years. , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[23]  J. Triedman,et al.  Results of a multicenter retrospective implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry of pediatric and congenital heart disease patients. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2014, International journal of surgery.

[25]  M. Silka,et al.  Sudden Cardiac Death and the Use ofImplantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Pediatric Patients , 1993, Circulation.