Pattern recognition in multiband imagery using stochastic expectation maximization

Hyperspectral sensors can facilitate automatic pattern recognition in cluttered imagery since man made objects often differ considerably from the natural background in absorbing and reflecting the radiation at various wavelengths i.e., the identification of the objects is based on spectral signature of the objects in the scene. In this paper, a unified approach for pattern recognition with known object signature is formulated by generating Gaussian mixture model to effectively utilize the underlying statistics of the data cube. To estimate the model parameters, enhanced version of the stochastic expectation maximization (SEM) algorithm is employed, which is also used successfully for image classification by reducing the unwanted information in the data cube. In the proposed scheme, at first we used the modified SEM to identify the different classes in the scene including the desired object class. Then, the Mahalanobis distance between the desired object signature and distributions of the mixture model is employed to detect the object class. Finally, the maximum a posteriori (MAP) probability for each pixel is estimated and Bayesian decision law is applied in order to isolate object pixels. The proposed algorithm has been tested using real life hyperspectral imagery and the results show that the algorithm shows robust performance in noisy environment.

[1]  John K. Thomas,et al.  Interference-invariant target detection in hyperspectral images , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[2]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  Some fundamentals and methods for hyperspectral image data analysis , 1999, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[3]  Luis O. Jimenez-Rodriguez,et al.  Partially supervised detection using band subset selection in hyperspectral data , 1999, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[4]  Wojciech Pieczynski,et al.  Algorithm and Unsupervised Segmentation of Satellite Images , 1993 .

[5]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Comparative analysis of hyperspectral adaptive matched filter detectors , 2000, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  E. M. Winter,et al.  Anomaly detection from hyperspectral imagery , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[7]  M S Alam,et al.  Fast registration and reconstruction of aliased low-resolution frames by use of a modified maximum-likelihood approach. , 1998, Applied optics.

[8]  D. Chauveau A stochastic EM algorithm for mixtures with censored data , 1995 .

[9]  Max Mignotte,et al.  Estimation of mixtures of probabilistic PCA with stochastic EM for the 3D biplanar reconstruction of scoliotic rib cage , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 2004. ICIP '04..

[10]  John R. Schott,et al.  Hybridization of hyperspectral imaging target detection algorithm chains , 2005 .

[11]  Gary A. Shaw,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Processing for Automatic Target Detection Applications , 2003 .

[12]  Russell M. Mersereau,et al.  On the impact of PCA dimension reduction for hyperspectral detection of difficult targets , 2005, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[13]  Noise-adjusted non orthogonal linear projections for hyperspectral data analysis , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[14]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Target detection in hyperspectral images based on independent component analysis , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[15]  Gangyao Kuang,et al.  Unsupervised classification method for hyperspectral image combining PCA and Gaussian mixture model , 2003, International Symposium on Multispectral Image Processing and Pattern Recognition.