The impact of delayed visual feedback on collaborative performance

When pairs work together on a physical task, seeing a common workspace benefits their performance and transforms their use of language. Previous results have demonstrated that visual information helps collaborative pairs to understand the current state of their task, ground their conversations, and communicate efficiently. However, collaborative technologies often impinge on the visual information needed to support successful collaboration. One example of this is the introduction of delayed visual feedback in a collaborative environment. We present results from two studies that detail the form of the function that describes the relationship between visual delay and collaborative task performance. The first study precisely demonstrates how a range of visual delays differentially impact performance and the collaborative strategies employed. The second study describes how parameters of the task, such as the dynamics of the visual environment, reduce the amount of delay that can be tolerated.

[1]  Allan Kuchinsky,et al.  Turning away from talking heads: the use of video-as-data in neurosurgery , 1993, INTERCHI.

[2]  M. Argyle,et al.  Gaze and Mutual Gaze , 1994, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[3]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Visual Information as a Conversational Resource in Collaborative Physical Tasks , 2003, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[4]  A. Anderson,et al.  The Effects of Visibility on Dialogue and Performance in a Cooperative Problem Solving Task , 1994 .

[5]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  The role of vision in face-to-face and mediated communication. , 1997 .

[6]  John C. Tang,et al.  Why do users like video? , 1992, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[7]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Action as language in a shared visual space , 2004, CSCW.

[8]  Peter Craven,et al.  Smoothing noisy data with spline functions , 1978 .

[9]  R. Krauss,et al.  Effects of Transmission Delay and Access Delay on the Efficiency of Verbal Communication , 1967 .

[10]  G. Wahba.  Smoothing noisy data with spline functions , 1975 .

[11]  S. Brennan.  4 How Conversation Is Shaped by Visual and Spoken Evidence , 2005 .

[12]  Steve Benford,et al.  Coping with inconsistency due to network delays in collaborative virtual environments , 1999, VRST '99.

[13]  J. Freidman,et al.  Multivariate adaptive regression splines , 1991 .

[14]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  The effects of network delays on group work in real-time groupware , 2001, ECSCW.

[15]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Revealing delay in collaborative environments , 2004, CHI.

[16]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Referring as a collaborative process , 1986, Cognition.

[17]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding , 2004 .

[18]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[19]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Where do helpers look?: gaze targets during collaborative physical tasks , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[20]  B. Webber,et al.  Elements of Discourse Understanding , 1983 .

[21]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Things to Talk About When Talking About Things , 2003, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[22]  M. F. Schober.  Spatial perspective-taking in conversation , 1993, Cognition.

[23]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  The use of visual information in shared visual spaces: informing the development of virtual co-presence , 2002, CSCW '02.

[24]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Language Efficiency and Visual Technology , 2004 .