Vowels as Islands of Reliability.

Vowel nuclei of syllables appear to provide a relatively stable (although not stationary) frame of reference for judging consonant events. We offer evidence that reliable consonant identification demands prior or simultaneous evaluation of this "vocalic frame." Listeners were presented a list of /bVs/, /dVs/, and /gVs/ syllables and were instructed to press a response key immediately upon recognizing a particular initial consonant target. Three groups of subjects monitored for /b/, /d/, and /g/, respectively. The test syllables contained 10 English vowels varying substantially in intrinsic duration. Response times to the initial consonants correlated positively with the duration of the following vowels, even when the effect of consonant-vowel formant transition duration was partialed out. The results suggest that consonant recognition is vowel dependent and, specifically, that a certain amount or proportion of the vowel formant trajectory must be evaluated before consonants can be reliably identified.

[1]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Cracking the Dual Code: Toward a Unitary Model of Phoneme Identification. , 1983, Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior.

[2]  A. Liberman,et al.  The role of selected stimulus-variables in the perception of the unvoiced stop consonants. , 1952, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[4]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Perceptual invariance and onset spectra for stop consonants in different vowel environments. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  S. Öhman.  Numerical Model of Coarticulation , 1967 .

[7]  B. Lindblom.  Spectrographic Study of Vowel Reduction , 1963 .

[8]  C. Fowler.  Converging sources of evidence on spoken and perceived rhythms of speech: cyclic production of vowels in monosyllabic stress feet. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Identification of vowels in “vowelless” syllables , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  A. House,et al.  The Influence of Consonant Environment upon the Secondary Acoustical Characteristics of Vowels , 1953 .

[11]  L. Bauer.  Tracing phonetic change in the received pronunciation of British English , 1985 .

[12]  S. Öhman.  Coarticulation in VCV Utterances: Spectrographic Measurements , 1966 .

[13]  A. Liberman,et al.  The role of consonant-vowel transitions in the perception of the stop and nasal consonants. , 1954 .

[14]  B. Lindblom.  Speech Production. Vowel Duration and a Model of Lip Mandible Coordination , 1982 .

[15]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Acoustic invariance in speech production: evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  H Winitz,et al.  Identification of stops and vowels for the burst portion of (p,t,k) isolated from conversational speech. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  R. Hammarberg.  The metaphysics of coarticulation , 1976 .

[18]  P Tallal,et al.  Developmental aphasia: rate of auditory processing and selective impairment of consonant perception. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Duration of Syllable Nuclei in English , 1960 .

[20]  Raymond G. Daniloff,et al.  On defining coarticulation , 1973 .

[21]  Randy L. Diehl,et al.  Identifying vowels in CVC syllables: Effects of inserting silence and noise , 1984 .

[22]  R. J. Hanson,et al.  Labial and mandibular dynamics during the production of bilabial consonants: preliminary observations. , 1973, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[23]  Carol A. Fowler,et al.  Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing , 1980 .

[24]  R. Diehl.  Coproduction and direct perception of phonetic segments: a critique , 1986 .

[25]  J. Reeds,et al.  Identification of Stops and Vowels for the Burst Portion of /p, t, k/ Isolated from Conversational Speech , 1972 .

[26]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Transitions, Glides, and Diphthongs , 1961 .

[27]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Perceptual invariance and onset spectra for stop consonants in different vowel environments , 1976 .

[28]  Carol A. Fowler,et al.  Perceivers as realists, talkers too: Commentary on papers by Strange, Diehl et al., and Rakerd and Verbrugge☆ , 1987 .

[29]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Phoneme identification and the lexicon , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  J. Perkell.  Physiology of speech production: results and implications of a quantitative cineradiographic study , 1969 .

[31]  A. House.  On Vowel Duration in English , 1961 .

[32]  S. Ohman.  Numerical model of coarticulation. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The perceptual classification of speech , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  V. Mann,et al.  Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction , 1978 .

[35]  L. A. Chistovich,et al.  Speech: articulation and perception , 1965 .