TMS and the functional neuroanatomy of attention
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Neil G. Muggleton,et al. New light through old windows: Moving beyond the “virtual lesion” approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2008, NeuroImage.
[2] T. A. Kelley,et al. Cortical mechanisms for shifting and holding visuospatial attention. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.
[3] L. Merabet,et al. Visual Phosphene Perception Modulated by Subthreshold Crossmodal Sensory Stimulation , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[4] Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al. Interhemispheric Effect of Parietal TMS on Somatosensory Response Confirmed Directly with Concurrent TMS–fMRI , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[5] Jason B. Mattingley,et al. Parietal disruption impairs reflexive spatial attention within and between sensory modalities , 2007, Neuropsychologia.
[6] Jason B. Mattingley,et al. Modality-Specific Control of Strategic Spatial Attention in Parietal Cortex , 2004, Neuron.
[7] Sven Bestmann,et al. Phosphene threshold as a function of contrast of external visual stimuli , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.
[8] Neil G. Muggleton,et al. Human frontal eye fields and target switching , 2010, Cortex.
[9] Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.
[10] Vincent Walsh,et al. The perceptual and functional consequences of parietal top-down modulation on the visual cortex. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.
[11] U. Mosimann,et al. Hemispheric asymmetry in visuospatial attention assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.
[12] T. Ro. What can TMS tell us about visual awareness? , 2010, Cortex.
[13] R. Desimone,et al. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.
[14] Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al. Visual cortex excitability increases during visual mental imagery—a TMS study in healthy human subjects , 2002, Brain Research.
[15] Ivan N Pigarev,et al. Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention: How Top-Down Feedback Highlights Relevant Locations , 2007, Science.
[16] L. Merabet,et al. Occipital Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Has Opposing Effects on Visual and Auditory Stimulus Detection: Implications for Multisensory Interactions , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[17] Á. Pascual-Leone,et al. Fast Backprojections from the Motion to the Primary Visual Area Necessary for Visual Awareness , 2001, Science.
[18] J. Mattingley,et al. Parietal neglect and visual awareness , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.
[19] Martin Eimer,et al. Crossmodal links in spatial attention are mediated by supramodal control processes: evidence from event-related potentials. , 2002, Psychophysiology.
[20] R. Deichmann,et al. Distinct causal influences of parietal versus frontal areas on human visual cortex: evidence from concurrent TMS-fMRI. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.
[21] L. Cohen,et al. Reduction of human visual cortex excitability using 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2000, Neurology.
[22] M. Corbetta,et al. Right TPJ deactivation during visual search: functional significance and support for a filter hypothesis. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.
[23] J. Rothwell,et al. Functional MRI of the immediate impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical and subcortical motor circuits , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.
[24] J. Driver,et al. Combining TMS and fMRI: From ‘virtual lesions’ to functional-network accounts of cognition , 2009, Cortex.
[25] M. Corbetta,et al. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[26] Mark Hallett,et al. Two periods of processing in the (circum)striate visual cortex as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1998, Neuropsychologia.
[27] E. Macaluso,et al. Supramodal Effects of Covert Spatial Orienting Triggered by Visual or Tactile Events , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[28] Christopher D Chambers,et al. Parietal Stimulation Decouples Spatial and Feature-Based Attention , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[29] Juha Silvanto,et al. Stimulation of the human frontal eye fields modulates sensitivity of extrastriate visual cortex. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.
[30] Chi-Hung Juan,et al. Dissociation of spatial attention and saccade preparation. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[31] J. Mattingley,et al. Fast and slow parietal pathways mediate spatial attention , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.
[32] Anna C Nobre,et al. FEF TMS affects visual cortical activity. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.
[33] Gregor Thut,et al. Dorsal posterior parietal rTMS affects voluntary orienting of visuospatial attention. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.
[34] Katherine M. Armstrong,et al. Visuomotor Origins of Covert Spatial Attention , 2003, Neuron.
[35] Martin Eimer,et al. Cortico-cortical interactions in spatial attention: A combined ERP/TMS study. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.
[36] M. Goldberg,et al. Space and attention in parietal cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.
[37] M Seyal,et al. Increased sensitivity to ipsilateral cutaneous stimuli following transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal lobe , 1995, Annals of neurology.
[38] T. Kammer. Masking visual stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, Psychological research.
[39] R. Deichmann,et al. Concurrent TMS-fMRI and Psychophysics Reveal Frontal Influences on Human Retinotopic Visual Cortex , 2006, Current Biology.
[40] Tony Ro,et al. Feedback Contributions to Visual Awareness in Human Occipital Cortex , 2003, Current Biology.
[41] Chris Rorden,et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left human frontal eye fields eliminates the cost of invalid endogenous cues , 2005, Neuropsychologia.
[42] Á. Pascual-Leone,et al. Spontaneous fluctuations in posterior alpha-band EEG activity reflect variability in excitability of human visual areas. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.
[43] Juha Silvanto,et al. Time course of the state-dependent effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the TMS-adaptation paradigm , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.
[44] R. Goebel,et al. Imaging the brain activity changes underlying impaired visuospatial judgments: simultaneous FMRI, TMS, and behavioral studies. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.
[45] K D Singh,et al. Transient and linearly graded deactivation of the human default-mode network by a visual detection task , 2008, NeuroImage.
[46] Robert Oostenveld,et al. Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention : How Top-Down Feedback Highlights Relevant Locations , 2007 .
[47] M. Corbetta,et al. A Common Network of Functional Areas for Attention and Eye Movements , 1998, Neuron.
[48] T. Paus,et al. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Human Frontal Eye Field: Effects on Visual Perception and Attention , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[49] Neil G. Muggleton,et al. Timing of Target Discrimination in Human Frontal Eye Fields , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[50] O. Tzeng,et al. Segregation of visual selection and saccades in human frontal eye fields. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.
[51] M. Corbetta,et al. The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind , 2008, Neuron.
[52] A. Pascual-Leone,et al. Induction of visual extinction by rapid‐rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of parietal lobe , 1994, Neurology.
[53] Jacob Jolij,et al. Figure–ground segregation requires two distinct periods of activity in V1: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2005, Neuroreport.
[54] Na Na,et al. Figure???ground segregation requires two distinct periods of activity in V1: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study: , 2006 .
[55] Tonia A. Rihs,et al. Resting EEG alpha-power over posterior sites indexes baseline visual cortex excitability , 2008 .
[56] Robin Laycock,et al. Evidence for fast signals and later processing in human V1/V2 and V5/MT+: A TMS study of motion perception. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.
[57] G. Rizzolatti,et al. Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.
[58] Á. Pascual-Leone,et al. Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.
[59] Colin Blakemore,et al. Spatial Attention Changes Excitability of Human Visual Cortex to Direct Stimulation , 2007, Current Biology.
[60] Neil G. Muggleton,et al. Testing the validity of the TMS state-dependency approach: Targeting functionally distinct motion-selective neural populations in visual areas V1/V2 and V5/MT+ , 2008, NeuroImage.
[61] Jason B. Mattingley,et al. Enhancement of visual selection during transient disruption of parietal cortex , 2006, Brain Research.
[62] Juha Silvanto,et al. Baseline cortical excitability determines whether TMS disrupts or facilitates behavior. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.