Benchmarking of monolithic MDO formulations and derivative computation techniques using OpenMDAO

The design optimization of coupled systems requires the implementation of multidisciplinary design optimization techniques in order to obtain consistent and optimal solutions. The associated research topics include the development of optimization algorithms, computational frameworks, and multidisciplinary design optimization formulations. This paper presents a benchmarking of the combination of monolithic formulations and derivative computation techniques. The monolithic formulations include typical literature formulations as well as new normalized variable hybrid formulation. A novel test problem is proposed which consists in the sizing of a space launcher thrust vector control electro-mechanical actuator. Solving the single multidisciplinary coupling present in this problem is complex due to the possibility to face one, two, or no solutions depending on the external load and reducer gear ratio configuration. A larger scale version of this test problem is also proposed and tested by adding a high degree of freedom point-to-point trajectory. The tests are carried out in order to obtain typical performance criteria but also some proposed additional robustness criteria such as variation of the initial conditions or the external load scale. These additional criteria are particularly relevant in an industrial engineering design context where knowledge capitalization and reuse are sought. The most significant findings are the interesting performances of the new formulation in terms of computational cost and the robustness. Furthermore, the effect of the choice of derivative computation strategy on different performance criteria is assessed for the original and larger scale problem, and thus underlines the benefits of full analytic gradient-based optimization.

[1]  Warren Hare,et al.  Best practices for comparing optimization algorithms , 2017, Optimization and Engineering.

[2]  J. S. Park,et al.  Motion profile planning of repetitive point-to-point control for maximum energy conversion efficiency under acceleration conditions , 1996 .

[3]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimisation - some formal methods, framework requirements, and application to vehicle design , 2001 .

[4]  Marc Budinger,et al.  Dimensional analysis and surrogate models for the thermal modeling of Multiphysics systems , 2017 .

[5]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Extensions to the design structure matrix for the description of multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization processes , 2012, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[6]  Jean-Charles Maré,et al.  Optimal preliminary design of electromechanical actuators , 2014 .

[7]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Principles of Optimal Design: Modeling and Computation , 1988 .

[8]  John T. Hwang,et al.  Review and Unification of Methods for Computing Derivatives of Multidisciplinary Computational Models , 2013 .

[9]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  OpenMDAO: an open-source framework for multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization , 2019, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[10]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Response surface based, concurrent subspace optimization for multidisciplinary system design , 1996 .

[11]  Marc Budinger,et al.  A MORE INTEGRATED DESIGN APPROACH FOR EMBEDDED MECHATRONIC SYSTEMS: APPLICATION TO ELECTRICAL THRUST REVERSER ACTUATION SYSTEMS , 2018 .

[12]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Benchmarking multidisciplinary design optimization algorithms , 2010 .

[13]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization: A survey of architectures , 2013 .

[14]  W. J. Thayer,et al.  A Brief History of Electrohydraulic Servomechanisms , 1978 .

[15]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Numerical difficulties associated with using equality constraints to achieve multi-level decomposition in structural optimization , 1986 .

[16]  Jean-Charles Maré,et al.  Computer-aided definition of sizing procedures and optimization problems of mechatronic systems , 2015, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[17]  Mark Blackburn,et al.  A Comparison of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Architectures with an Aircraft Case Study , 2019, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum.

[18]  N. M. Alexandrov,et al.  Algorithmic Perspectives on Problem Formulations in MDO , 2000 .

[19]  Scott Delbecq,et al.  Knowledge-Based Multidisciplinary Sizing and Optimization of Embedded Mechatronic Systems - Application to Aerospace Electro-Mechanical Actuation Systems , 2018 .

[20]  Ch. Kessler,et al.  Active rotor control for helicopters: individual blade control and swashplateless rotor designs , 2011 .

[21]  M. Powell A Direct Search Optimization Method That Models the Objective and Constraint Functions by Linear Interpolation , 1994 .

[22]  John T. Hwang A Modular Approach to Large-scale Design Optimization of Aerospace Systems. , 2015 .

[23]  Marc Budinger,et al.  Modelling and design approaches for the preliminary design of power electronic converters , 2017 .

[24]  Jérôme Piaton,et al.  A framework for sizing embedded mechatronic systems during preliminary design , 2017 .

[25]  Cesare Carnevale,et al.  Vega Electromechanical Thrust Vector Control Development , 2007 .

[26]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  A Computational Architecture for Coupling Heterogeneous Numerical Models and Computing Coupled Derivatives , 2018, ACM Trans. Math. Softw..

[27]  Kenneth T. Moore,et al.  Standard Platform for Benchmarking Multidisciplinary Design Analysis and Optimization Architectures , 2013 .

[28]  J. Hopcroft,et al.  Triangular Factorization and Inversion by Fast Matrix Multiplication , 1974 .

[29]  Kamran Behdinan,et al.  Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Optimization Approaches for Aircraft Conceptual D esign , 2004 .

[30]  Jan Wikander,et al.  Optimal selection of motor and gearhead in mechatronic applications , 2006 .

[31]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF COUPLED SYSTEMS: A CRITICAL OVERVIEW OF APPROACHES , 1994 .

[32]  Marc Budinger,et al.  Optimization of primary flight control actuation system using parametric sizing models of actuators, power electronics and structural analysis , 2018 .