Humans Perceive Binocular Rivalry and Fusion in a Tristable Dynamic State

Human vision combines inputs from the two eyes into one percept. Small differences “fuse” together, whereas larger differences are seen “rivalrously” from one eye at a time. These outcomes are typically treated as mutually exclusive processes, with paradigms targeting one or the other and fusion being unreported in most rivalry studies. Is fusion truly a default, stable state that only breaks into rivalry for non-fusible stimuli? Or are monocular and fused percepts three sub-states of one dynamical system? To determine whether fusion and rivalry are separate processes, we measured human perception of Gabor patches with a range of interocular orientation disparities. Observers (10 female, 5 male) reported rivalrous, fused, and uncertain percepts over time. We found a dynamic “tristable” zone spanning from ∼25–35° of orientation disparity where fused, left-eye-, or right-eye-dominant percepts could all occur. The temporal characteristics of fusion and non-fusion periods during tristability matched other bistable processes. We tested statistical models with fusion as a higher-level bistable process alternating with rivalry against our findings. None of these fit our data, but a simple bistable model extended to have three states reproduced many of our observations. We conclude that rivalry and fusion are multistable substates capable of direct competition, rather than separate bistable processes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT When inputs to the two eyes differ, they can either fuse together or engage in binocular rivalry, where each eye's view is seen exclusively in turn. Visual stimuli have often been tailored to produce either fusion or rivalry, implicitly treating them as separate mutually-exclusive perceptual processes. We have found that some similar-but-different stimuli can result in both outcomes over time. Comparing various simple models with our results suggests that rivalry and fusion are not independent processes, but compete within a single multistable system. This conceptual shift is a step toward unifying fusion and rivalry, and understanding how they both contribute to the visual system's production of a unified interpretation of the conflicting images cast on the retina by real-world scenes.

[1]  Charles Wheatstone On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. , 1962 .

[2]  R. Blake,et al.  Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[3]  Joel Pearson,et al.  Sensory memory for ambiguous vision , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  R. Blake © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 5 A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies , 2000 .

[5]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[6]  A. Welchman,et al.  “What Not” Detectors Help the Brain See in Depth , 2017, Current Biology.

[7]  C. Wheatstone XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[8]  R. Heydt,et al.  THE ROLE OF ORIENTATION DISPARITY IN STEREOSCOPIC PERCEPTION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF BINOCULAR CORRESPONDENCE , 1981 .

[9]  Robert P. O'Shea,et al.  Effects of Orientation and Spatial Frequency on Monocular and Binocular Rivalry , 1997, ICONIP.

[10]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[11]  John Rinzel,et al.  Noise and adaptation in multistable perception: noise drives when to switch, adaptation determines percept choice. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[12]  Casper J. Erkelens,et al.  Fusional limits for a large random-dot stereogram , 1988, Vision Research.

[13]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Disruption of implicit perceptual memory by intervening neutral stimuli , 2007, Vision Research.

[14]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Common mechanisms for 2D tilt and 3D slant after-effects , 2002, Vision Research.

[15]  D. Bub,et al.  The face of race: Revealing the visual prototype of Black and White faces in Caucasian subjects , 2010 .

[16]  N. Wade The effect of orientation in binocular contour rivalry of real images and afterimages , 1974 .

[17]  Frederick L. Kitterle,et al.  The effects of spatial frequency, orientation, and color upon binocular rivalry and monocular pattern alternation , 1980 .

[18]  O J Braddick,et al.  Binocular single vision and perceptual processing , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[19]  Robert Fox,et al.  Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations , 1967 .

[20]  B. G. Cumming,et al.  An unexpected specialization for horizontal disparity in primate primary visual cortex , 2002, Nature.

[21]  B. G. Cumming,et al.  Vertical disparities and perception of three-dimensional shape , 1991, Nature.

[22]  Wolfgang Einhäuser,et al.  Tri-stable stimuli reveal interactions among subsequent percepts: Rivalry is biased by perceptual history , 2010, Vision Research.

[23]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Thom Carney,et al.  Orientation discrimination as a function of stimulus eccentricity and size: Nasal/temporal retinal asymmetry , 1988, Vision Research.

[25]  S. R. Lehky Binocular rivalry is not chaotic , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Inna Tsirlin,et al.  A computational theory of da Vinci stereopsis. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[27]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry , 2005, Vision Research.

[28]  Kung Yao,et al.  Perceptual dominance time distributions in multistable visual perception , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[29]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  A Spiking Neuron Model for Binocular Rivalry , 2000 .

[30]  Ahna R Girshick,et al.  Probabilistic combination of slant information: weighted averaging and robustness as optimal percepts. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[31]  Robert Fox,et al.  The psychophysical inquiry into binocular summation , 1973 .

[32]  B Gillam,et al.  Orientation Disparity, Deformation, and Stereoscopic Slant Perception , 1991, Perception.

[33]  B. Julesz,et al.  The neural transfer characteristic (neurontropy) for binocular stochastic stimulation , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  R. Blake,et al.  Further developments in binocular summation , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  Peng Zhang,et al.  Binocular Rivalry Requires Visual Attention , 2011, Neuron.

[36]  R. Blake,et al.  The precedence of binocular fusion over binocular rivalry , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  B. Julesz,et al.  Neurontropy, an entropy-like measure of neural correlation, in binocular fusion and rivalry , 1976, Biological Cybernetics.

[38]  Sheng He,et al.  Binocular rivalry from invisible patterns , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  David Alais,et al.  Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: Evidence for common processes , 2009, Vision Research.

[40]  Jean-Michel Hupé Dynamics of enage a trois in moving plaid ambiguous perception , 2010 .

[41]  R. van Ee,et al.  Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: a low-level neural model. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[42]  Peter Gregor,et al.  Binocular single vision achieved by fusion and suppression , 1977 .

[43]  D. W. Heeley,et al.  Recognition of stimulus orientation , 1990, Vision Research.

[44]  Shinji Takase,et al.  Local binocular fusion is involved in global binocular rivalry , 2008, Vision Research.

[45]  B. Julesz,et al.  Extension of Panum's fusional area in binocularly stabilized vision. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[46]  A. B. Nutt Binocular vision. , 1945, The British orthoptic journal.

[47]  R. Crone Human cyclofusional response. , 1971, Vision research.

[48]  R. P. O'Shea Chronometric analysis supports fusion rather than suppression theory of binocular vision , 1987, Vision Research.

[49]  J. Hupé,et al.  Temporal Dynamics of Auditory and Visual Bistability Reveal Common Principles of Perceptual Organization , 2006, Current Biology.

[50]  A. Borsellino,et al.  Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli , 1972, Kybernetik.

[51]  W. Levelt On binocular rivalry , 1965 .

[52]  Jeounghoon Kim,et al.  Hysteresis effects in stereopsis and binocular rivalry , 2008, Vision Research.

[53]  S. R. Lehky An Astable Multivibrator Model of Binocular Rivalry , 1988, Perception.

[54]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Binocular contrast, stereopsis, and rivalry: Toward a dynamical synthesis , 2017, Vision Research.

[55]  W J Levelt,et al.  Note on the distribution of dominance times in binocular rivalry. , 1967, British journal of psychology.

[56]  S P McKee,et al.  Binocular Rivalry Disrupts Stereopsis , 1994, Perception.

[57]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[58]  R. Blake,et al.  Visual motion, binocular correspondence and binocular rivalry , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[59]  Bruce G. Cumming,et al.  Understanding the Cortical Specialization for Horizontal Disparity , 2004, Neural Computation.

[60]  H. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception , 2001, Nature.

[61]  G. Sperling Binocular Vision: A Physical and a Neural Theory , 1970 .

[62]  Randolph Blake,et al.  On the coexistence of stereopsis and binocular rivalry , 1991, Vision Research.

[63]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Periodic perturbations producing phase-locked fluctuations in visual perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[64]  R. Blake A neural theory of binocular rivalry. , 1989, Psychological review.

[65]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional surface perception: Binocular and half-occluded scenic images , 1997, Neural Networks.

[66]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Attention Speeds Binocular Rivalry , 2006, Psychological science.

[67]  P. Panum Physiologische Untersuchungen über das Sehen mit zwei Augen , 1858 .

[68]  E. Birch,et al.  Interobserver test-retest reliability of the Randot preschool stereoacuity test. , 2000, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[69]  D. W. Heeley,et al.  Meridional anisotropies of orientation discrimination for sine wave gratings , 1988, Vision Research.

[70]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Hysteresis in binocular grating perception: Contrast effects , 1977, Vision Research.

[71]  P. Walker Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations , 1975 .

[72]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Evidence for Perceptual “Trapping” and Adaptation in Multistable Binocular Rivalry , 2002, Neuron.

[73]  Hugh R Wilson,et al.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Da vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points , 1990, Vision Research.

[75]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  A Common Oscillator for Perceptual Rivalries? , 2003, Perception.

[76]  R Fox,et al.  Stochastic properties of stabilized-image binocular rivalry alternations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.