Interval multiplicative pairwise comparison matrix: Consistency, indeterminacy and normality

Abstract To manifest human judgments, a long-established method called Pairwise Comparison (PC) has been successfully applied in the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). In practice, human judgments are often made with uncertainty, and can be characterized by an Interval Multiplicative Pairwise Comparison Matrix (IMPCM). Since consistency is a key issue that has plagued decision makers and researchers for a long time, it is useful to propose a transformation that can effectively convert an inconsistent IMPCM into a consistent one, especially in group decision-making. However, a consistent IMPCM is not sufficient to be acceptable, indeterminacy should also be considered. Moreover, the interval priority weights should be normalized. To consider consistency, indeterminacy, and normality simultaneously, we put forward a new definition of acceptable IMPCM. To obtain such an acceptable IMPCM, we propose a theorem of consistency, a consistent transformation, and a normalized prioritization scheme. As a result, the proposed methods guarantee an inconsistent IMPCM can be directly converted into an acceptable IMPCM. Five theorems are proved to corroborate the proposed methods. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the validity and superiority of the proposed methods. Finally, discussion and conclusions are given.

[1]  Massimo Marinacci,et al.  Decision analysis under ambiguity , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Jacek Szybowski,et al.  The limit of inconsistency reduction in pairwise comparisons , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci..

[3]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[4]  Fang Liu,et al.  A new method of obtaining the priority weights from an interval fuzzy preference relation , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[5]  Zhou-Jing Wang,et al.  Acceptability analysis and priority weight elicitation for interval multiplicative comparison matrices , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  L. C. Leung,et al.  On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Lisa Scholten,et al.  Tackling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis - An application to water supply infrastructure planning , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  An eigenvector method for generating normalized interval and fuzzy weights , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[9]  Yin-Feng Xu,et al.  A comparative study of the numerical scales and the prioritization methods in AHP , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Hideo Tanaka,et al.  Interval priorities in AHP by interval regression analysis , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Group decision making with multiplicative interval linguistic hesitant fuzzy preference relations , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[13]  Waldemar W. Koczkodaj,et al.  Pairwise Comparisons Rating Scale Paradox , 2015, Trans. Comput. Collect. Intell..

[14]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  The multiplicative consistency threshold of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[15]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Interval weight generation approaches based on consistency test and interval comparison matrices , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[16]  K. Atanassov,et al.  Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets , 2019, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[17]  V. Torra,et al.  A framework for linguistic logic programming , 2010 .

[18]  Fang Liu,et al.  A group decision-making model with interval multiplicative reciprocal matrices based on the geometric consistency index , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[19]  Zhou-Jing Wang,et al.  Goal programming approaches to deriving interval weights based on interval fuzzy preference relations , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[20]  Hong-Xing Li,et al.  Note on "On the normalization of interval and fuzzy weights" , 2009, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[21]  Bice Cavallo,et al.  A general unified framework for interval pairwise comparison matrices , 2017, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[22]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[23]  Fang Liu,et al.  Acceptable consistency analysis of interval reciprocal comparison matrices , 2009, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[24]  Ondrej Pavlacka On various approaches to normalization of interval and fuzzy weights , 2014, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[25]  Virgilio López-Morales,et al.  A Reliable Method for Consistency Improving of Interval Multiplicative Preference Relations Expressed under Uncertainty , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[26]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Consistency test and weight generation for additive interval fuzzy preference relations , 2013, Soft Computing.

[27]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A survey of preference relations , 2007, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[28]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  A two-stage logarithmic goal programming method for generating weights from interval comparison matrices , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[29]  Zhou-Jing Wang,et al.  Consistency analysis and priority derivation of triangular fuzzy preference relations based on modal value and geometric mean , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[30]  Meimei Xia,et al.  Studies on Interval Multiplicative Preference Relations and Their Application to Group Decision Making , 2015 .

[31]  Zhou-Jing Wang,et al.  A note on "A goal programming model for incomplete interval multiplicative preference relations and its application in group decision-making" , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  A goal programming method for obtaining interval weights from an interval comparison matrix , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Jing Li,et al.  A novel method for aggregating interval multiplicative comparison matrices and its application in ranking alternatives , 2018, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[34]  Raffaello Seri,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Theory of Measurement , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Peijun Guo,et al.  Eliciting dual interval probabilities from interval comparison matrices , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[36]  Fang Liu,et al.  On Consistency in AHP and Fuzzy AHP , 2017 .

[37]  Kevin Kam Fung Yuen,et al.  Important Facts and Observations about Pairwise Comparisons (the special issue edition) , 2016, Fundam. Informaticae.

[38]  T. Saaty Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process , 1986 .

[39]  Saeid Abbasbandy,et al.  A new approach for ranking of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers , 2009, Comput. Math. Appl..

[40]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Limited Rationality and Its Quantification Through the Interval Number Judgments With Permutations , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[41]  Didier Dubois,et al.  The role of fuzzy sets in decision sciences: Old techniques and new directions , 2011, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[42]  T. Tanino Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making , 1984 .

[43]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[45]  Jian Lin,et al.  Consistency and optimized priority weight analytical solutions of interval multiplicative preference relations , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[46]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[47]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  On the normalization of interval and fuzzy weights , 2006, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[48]  Fang Liu,et al.  Consistency analysis of triangular fuzzy reciprocal preference relations , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..