‘Swinging on the anchor’: The difficulties in achieving greenhouse gas abatement in shipping via virtual arrival

[1]  Hannes von Knorring,et al.  Energy audits in shipping companies , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[2]  Monica Lundh,et al.  Energy efficiency at sea: An activity theoretical perspective on operational energy efficiency in maritime transport , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[3]  Harilaos N. Psaraftis,et al.  Speed Optimization vs Speed Reduction: the Choice between Speed Limits and a Bunker Levy , 2019, Sustainability.

[4]  H. Psaraftis.  Decarbonization of maritime transport: to be or not to be? , 2019 .

[5]  Rudy R. Negenborn,et al.  Dynamic optimization of ship energy efficiency considering time-varying environmental factors , 2018, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[6]  R. Adland,et al.  The energy efficiency effects of periodic ship hull cleaning , 2018 .

[7]  S. Ponte,et al.  Environmental upgrading in global value chains: The potential and limitations of ports in the greening of maritime transport , 2018 .

[8]  Yi-Shih Chung,et al.  Burnout in seafarers: its antecedents and effects on incidents at sea , 2017 .

[9]  John Black,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from ships in ports – Case studies in four continents , 2017 .

[10]  Tristan Smith,et al.  Energy efficiency with the application of Virtual Arrival policy , 2017 .

[11]  Stephen John Pettit,et al.  Revisiting history: Can shipping achieve a second socio-technical transition for carbon emissions reduction? , 2017 .

[12]  B. Pauksztat.  Effects of job demands and social interactions on fatigue in short sea cargo shipping , 2017 .

[13]  Peter Andersson,et al.  Green approaches at sea - The benefits of adjusting speed instead of anchoring , 2017 .

[14]  Sarah Mander,et al.  Slow steaming and a new dawn for wind propulsion: A multi-level analysis of two low carbon shipping transitions , 2017 .

[15]  Eduardo Lalla-Ruiz,et al.  The waterway ship scheduling problem , 2016 .

[16]  H. Johnson,et al.  The logic of business vs. the logic of energy management practice: understanding the choices and effects of energy consumption monitoring systems in shipping companies , 2016 .

[17]  S. Ponte,et al.  Buyer-driven greening? Cargo-owners and environmental upgrading in maritime shipping , 2016 .

[18]  Henrik Sornn-Friese,et al.  Achieving energy efficient ship operations under third party management: How do ship management models influence energy efficiency? , 2015 .

[19]  Alice Bows-Larkin,et al.  All adrift: aviation, shipping, and climate change policy , 2015 .

[20]  Tristan Smith,et al.  Barriers to energy efficiency in shipping: A triangulated approach to investigate the principal agent problem , 2015 .

[21]  René Taudal Poulsen,et al.  Orchestrating transnational environmental governance in maritime shipping , 2015 .

[22]  James J. Winebrake,et al.  Third IMO GHG Study , 2015 .

[23]  Rafael Y. Lefkowitz,et al.  International Seafarers and Transnationalism in the Twenty-First Century , 2015 .

[24]  Linda Styhre,et al.  Increased energy efficiency in short sea shipping through decreased time in port , 2015 .

[25]  N. Rehmatulla,et al.  Market failures and barriers affecting energy efficient operations in shipping , 2014 .

[26]  Ching-Chih Chang,et al.  Evaluating the effects of speed reduce for shipping costs and CO2 emission , 2014 .

[27]  E. Fridell,et al.  Environmental assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas, liquefied biogas, methanol and bio-methanol , 2014 .

[28]  W. Ochieng,et al.  Evaluation of cold ironing and speed reduction policies to reduce ship emissions near and at ports , 2014 .

[29]  Carel Dieperink,et al.  Blowin' in the wind? Drivers and barriers for the uptake of wind propulsion in international shipping , 2014 .

[30]  Mikael Johansson,et al.  Barriers to improving energy efficiency in short sea shipping: an action research case study , 2014 .

[31]  David Gibbs,et al.  The role of sea ports in end-to-end maritime transport chain emissions , 2014 .

[32]  Mikael Johansson,et al.  Will the ship energy efficiency management plan reduce CO2 emissions? A comparison with ISO 50001 and the ISM code , 2013 .

[33]  Xiangtong Qi,et al.  Minimizing fuel emissions by optimizing vessel schedules in liner shipping with uncertain port times , 2012 .

[34]  J. Anable,et al.  Scientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: a critical review , 2011 .

[35]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  Berth allocation considering fuel consumption and vessel emissions , 2011 .

[36]  A. Stromman,et al.  Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and cost by shipping at lower speeds , 2011 .

[37]  Pierre Cariou,et al.  Is slow steaming a sustainable means of reducing CO2 emissions from container shipping , 2011 .

[38]  S. Dalsøren,et al.  Future cost scenarios for reduction of ship CO2 emissions , 2011 .

[39]  Inge Norstad,et al.  Reducing fuel emissions by optimizing speed on shipping routes , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[40]  James J. Corbett,et al.  The effectiveness and costs of speed reductions on emissions from international shipping , 2009 .

[41]  Georgios K. D. Saharidis,et al.  The berth allocation problem: Optimizing vessel arrival time , 2009 .

[42]  René Taudal Poulsen.  Liner Shipping and Technological Innovation: Ostasiat and the Container Revolution, 1963–75 , 2007 .

[43]  John Dinwoodie,et al.  Spatial aspects of tanker lay-times , 2002 .

[44]  S. Kvale,et al.  InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing , 1996 .

[45]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms : theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings , 1998 .