Two-stage normalization using background intensities in cDNA microarray data

BackgroundIn the microarray experiment, many undesirable systematic variations are commonly observed. Normalization is the process of removing such variation that affects the measured gene expression levels. Normalization plays an important role in the earlier stage of microarray data analysis. The subsequent analysis results are highly dependent on normalization. One major source of variation is the background intensities. Recently, some methods have been employed for correcting the background intensities. However, all these methods focus on defining signal intensities appropriately from foreground and background intensities in the image analysis. Although a number of normalization methods have been proposed, no systematic methods have been proposed using the background intensities in the normalization process.ResultsIn this paper, we propose a two-stage method adjusting for the effect of background intensities in the normalization process. The first stage fits a regression model to adjust for the effect of background intensities and the second stage applies the usual normalization method such as a nonlinear LOWESS method to the background-adjusted intensities. In order to carry out the two-stage normalization method, we consider nine different background measures and investigate their performances in normalization. The performance of two-stage normalization is compared to those of global median normalization as well as intensity dependent nonlinear LOWESS normalization. We use the variability among the replicated slides to compare performance of normalization methods.ConclusionsFor the selected background measures, the proposed two-stage normalization method performs better than global or intensity dependent nonlinear LOWESS normalization method. Especially, when there is a strong relationship between the background intensity and the signal intensity, the proposed method performs much better. Regardless of background correction methods used in the image analysis, the proposed two-stage normalization method can be applicable as long as both signal intensity and background intensity are available.

[1]  G. Churchill,et al.  Experimental design for gene expression microarrays. , 2001, Biostatistics.

[2]  Charles L. Kooperberg,et al.  Improved Background Correction for Spotted DNA Microarrays , 2002, J. Comput. Biol..

[3]  P. Nelson,et al.  Project normal: Defining normal variance in mouse gene expression , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  W. Cleveland.  Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[5]  Taesung Park,et al.  Statistical tests for identifying differentially expressed genes in time-course microarray experiments , 2003, Bioinform..

[6]  S. Knudsen,et al.  A new non-linear normalization method for reducing variability in DNA microarray experiments , 2002, Genome Biology.

[7]  S. Dudoit,et al.  Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  William C Reinhold,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of mitotic genes by camptothecin-induced DNA damage: microarray analysis of dose- and time-dependent effects. , 2002, Cancer research.

[9]  G. S. Johnson,et al.  An Information-Intensive Approach to the Molecular Pharmacology of Cancer , 1997, Science.

[10]  Robert Clarke,et al.  Iterative normalization of cDNA microarray data , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[11]  T. Kepler,et al.  Normalization and analysis of DNA microarray data by self-consistency and local regression , 2002, Genome Biology.

[12]  Pierre R. Bushel,et al.  Assessing Gene Significance from cDNA Microarray Expression Data via Mixed Models , 2001, J. Comput. Biol..

[13]  Taesung Park,et al.  Evaluation of normalization methods for microarray data , 2003 .

[14]  Jin Hyuk KIm,et al.  A novel method using edge detection for signal extraction from cDNA microarray image analysis , 2001, Experimental & Molecular Medicine.

[15]  Gary A. Churchill,et al.  Analysis of Variance for Gene Expression Microarray Data , 2000, J. Comput. Biol..

[16]  David Edwards,et al.  Non-linear Normalization and Background Correction in One-channel CDNA Microarray Studies , 2003, Bioinform..

[17]  Jin Hyuk KIm,et al.  Effect of local background intensities in the normalization of cDNA microarray data with a skewed expression profiles , 2002, Experimental & Molecular Medicine.

[18]  C. Li,et al.  Feature extraction and normalization algorithms for high‐density oligonucleotide gene expression array data , 2001, Journal of cellular biochemistry. Supplement.

[19]  James J. Chen,et al.  Normalization Methods for Analysis of Microarray Gene-Expression Data , 2003, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[20]  Samuel S. Wu,et al.  A statistical method for flagging weak spots improves normalization and ratio estimates in microarrays. , 2001, Physiological genomics.