Cartilage splitting without stitches: technique and outcomes.

IMPORTANCE Otoplasty procedures usually involve cartilage sparing, with stitches or cartilage scoring. These techniques have been widely reviewed in the literature. The technique reported in this study requires neither stitches nor rasping but rather a complete separation of the helix and antihelix, with nontransfixing incisions to break the cartilaginous springs. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the technical details, aesthetic results, and complications in a series of otoplasty procedures involving cartilage splitting without stitches. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent otoplasty procedures between January 2004 and September 2010, by the same senior surgeon. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES File data on complications, recurrences, and revision rates were collected. An aesthetic evaluation of the postoperative results was conducted by a panel of 3 plastic surgeons and 3 lay observers. RESULTS Our series included 58 patients, with a mean age of 16 years. No recurrences were reported. Six patients (10%) experienced minor complications. No revisions were needed. No chondritis or skin necrosis was noted. The aesthetic results were very good for 36 patients (62%) by the plastic surgeons and 39 patients (68%) by lay observers. The remaining aesthetic results were judged as good. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The Jost otoplasty procedure described herein requires no nonabsorbable sutures to bend the cartilage, avoiding many complications. The technique is safe, reliable, and reproducible, with predictable and permanent outcomes. It is also useful for secondary otoplasty after failed Stenström or Mustarde otoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.

[1]  G. Sordo,et al.  Minimally Invasive Otoplasty: Technical Details and Long-Term Results , 2012, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[2]  K. Stelter,et al.  Health-Related Quality of Life, Patient Benefit, and Clinical Outcome after Otoplasty Using Suture Techniques in 62 Children and Adults , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  W. Müller,et al.  Otoplasty using a modified anterior scoring technique: standardized measurements of long-term results. , 2010, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[4]  R. Farrior,et al.  Retrospective analysis of the Farrior technique for otoplasty. , 2007, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[5]  K. Stewart,et al.  Comparison of cartilage scoring and cartilage sparing otoplasty--A study of 203 cases. , 2006, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[6]  G. Sprinzl,et al.  Health-related Quality of Life Outcome of Adult Patients after Otoplasty , 2006, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[7]  A. Jebreel,et al.  Otoplasty: a review of the surgical techniques , 2005, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[8]  D. Furnas Otoplasty for prominent ears. , 2002, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[9]  S. Stenstrom,et al.  The Stenstrom otoplasty. , 1978, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[10]  J. Mustardé Correction of prominent ears using buried mattress sutures. , 1978, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[11]  B. Meresse,et al.  ATLAS OF AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY , 1974 .

[12]  S. Stenstroem A “NATURAL” TECHNIQUE FOR CORRECTION OF CONGENITALLY PROMINENT EARS , 1963, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  R. Farrior A method of otoplasty; normal contour of the antihelix and scaphoid fossa. , 1959, A.M.A. archives of otolaryngology.

[14]  O. J. Becker Surgical correction of the abnormally protruding ear. , 1949, Archives of otolaryngology.

[15]  V. Chongchet A METHOD OF ANTIHELIX RECONSTRUCTION. , 1963, British journal of plastic surgery.

[16]  J. F. Dieffenbach Die operative Chirurgie , 1845 .