The Effect of Quality Assessment and Directional Goal Commitment on Auditors' Acceptance of Client‐Preferred Accounting Methods

Previous research demonstrates that auditors' directional goals influence their reporting decisions. For example, when auditors have goals of accepting client‐preferred accounting methods, they tend to exploit ambiguity in reporting standards to justify those methods, even when they are aggressive (Hackenbrack and Nelson 1996). We report an experimental investigation of the likely effectiveness of regulation designed to curb this tendency. Specifically, regulators suggest that having auditors identify benchmarks or assess the quality of various methods will “raise the bar” for method acceptability, thereby reducing auditor acceptance of aggressive reporting methods. However, this reasoning ignores the fact that ambiguity typically surrounds quality assessment. Following motivated reasoning theory, we argue that, in order to meet the increased standard for acceptability, auditors with high commitment to directional goals will exploit the ambiguity surrounding the quality of various methods when making qual...

[1]  S. F. Biggs,et al.  Aggressive Client Reporting: Factors Affecting Auditors' Generation of Financial Reporting Alternatives , 2002 .

[2]  Ulf-Dietrich Reips.  Chapter 4 – The Web Experiment Method: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Solutions , 2000 .

[3]  Ulf-Dietrich Reips,et al.  The Web Experiment Method , 2000 .

[4]  Baruch Lev,et al.  To warn or not to warn: Management disclosures in the face of an earnings surprise , 1995 .

[5]  M. W. Nelson,et al.  Evidence from Auditors About Managers' and Auditors' Earnings-Management Decisions , 2001 .

[6]  Lisa Koonce,et al.  The persuasiveness of audit evidence: The case of accounting policy decisions☆ , 1997 .

[7]  Douglas J. Skinner.  WHY FIRMS VOLUNTARILY DISCLOSE BAD-NEWS , 1994 .

[8]  Reeshad S. Dalal,et al.  Validity of Web-Based Psychological Research , 2000 .

[9]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[10]  Eugene F. Stone,et al.  Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: Empirical evidence and related matters. , 1989 .

[11]  A. Kruglanski.  The Psychology of Being "Right": The Problem of Accuracy in Social Perception and Cognition , 1989 .

[12]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Techniques for Creating and Using Web Questionnaires in Research and Teaching , 2000 .

[13]  J. Kagan,et al.  Rational choice in an uncertain world , 1988 .

[14]  Michael Domjan,et al.  The Psychology of Being " Right " : The Problem of Accuracy in Social Perception and Cognition , 2001 .

[15]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypothesis-testing model , 1987 .

[16]  Benson,et al.  A Rejection Threshold in Justice Evaluations: Effects on Judgment and Decision-Making. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[17]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  The Assessment of Goal Commitment: A Measurement Model Meta-Analysis. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[18]  James A. Scepansky,et al.  Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. , 1998 .

[19]  Jane Kennedy,et al.  Instrumental Bias in Motivated Reasoning: More When More Is Needed , 1997 .

[20]  Terry D. Warfield,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Independence Risk: Framework for Analysis , 2001 .

[21]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  “Some Things You Learn Aren't So”: Cohen's Paradox, Asch's Paradigm, and the Interpretation of Interaction , 1995 .

[22]  Analysts' Reactions to Warnings of Negative Earnings Surprises , 2000 .

[23]  R. Prislin,et al.  Motivated Cognitive Processing and Attitude Change , 1998 .

[24]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  The Impossibility of Auditor Independence , 1997 .

[25]  M. Birnbaum.  Testing Critical Properties of Decision Making on the Internet , 1999 .

[26]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Social Cognition: Making Sense of People , 1999 .

[27]  Peter H. Ditto,et al.  Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions , 1992 .

[28]  J. Hollenbeck,et al.  An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals. , 1989 .

[29]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  Christine M. Haynes,et al.  The Relationship between Client Advocacy and Audit Experience: An Exploratory Analysis , 2002 .

[31]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  Market rewards associated with patterns of increasing earnings , 1999 .