Exposure to Ideological News and Perceived Opinion Climate

Spiral-of-silence theory assumes that a monolithic stream of messages from mainstream media, leaving little ability for audiences to seek ideologically congruent news, affects people’s perceptions of the distribution of opinion in society. While these assumptions may have been valid when Noelle-Neumann developed her theory forty years ago, the new media landscape, characterized by the proliferation of ideological media outlets, makes them seem outdated. Do audiences of conservative-leaning media perceive a conservative opinion climate while audiences of liberal-leaning media perceive a more liberal distribution of opinion? And if so, what are the consequences? We examine these questions using two data sets collected in extremely different contexts (Study 1 in the context of the 2005 Israeli disengagement from Gaza, n = 519; Study 2, in the context of the 2004 U.S. presidential elections using the National Annenberg Election Survey, n = 9,058). In both studies, selective exposure to ideological media outlets was associated with opinion climate perceptions that were biased in the direction of the media outlets’ ideologies. In Study 2, we also demonstrated that partisan selective exposure indirectly contributes to political polarization, and that this effect is mediated by opinion climate perceptions.

[1]  J. Cappella,et al.  Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment , 2008 .

[2]  R. Garrett.  Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate , 2009 .

[3]  James M. Fields,et al.  Public Beliefs About the Beliefs of the Public , 1976 .

[4]  E. Noelle-Neumann,et al.  Turbulences in the Climate of Opinion: Methodological Applications of the Spiral of Silence Theory , 1977 .

[5]  Daniel Romer,et al.  Capturing campaign dynamics, 2000 and 2004 : the national Annenberg election survey , 2006 .

[6]  Yariv Tsfati,et al.  Why do People Trust Media Pre‐Election Polls? Evidence from the Israeli 1996 Elections , 2001 .

[7]  M. Prior,et al.  Media and Political Polarization , 2013 .

[8]  Diana C. Mutz.  Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes , 1998 .

[9]  N. Stroud.  Niche News: The Politics of News Choice , 2011 .

[10]  M. Slater.  Reinforcing Spirals: The Mutual Influence of Media Selectivity and Media Effects and Their Impact on Individual Behavior and Social Identity , 2007 .

[11]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign , 1968 .

[12]  Yariv Tsfati,et al.  On the Effect of the “Third-Person Effect”: Perceived Influence of Media Coverage and Residential Mobility Intentions , 2003 .

[13]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  C. Sunstein.  Republic.com 2.0 , 2007 .

[15]  D. A. Jones,et al.  The Polarizing Effect of New Media Messages , 2002 .

[16]  E. Noelle-Neumann,et al.  The Spiral of Silence and the Social Nature of Man , 2004 .

[17]  Vincent Price,et al.  SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION AND PUBLIC OPINION EFFECTS OF COMMUNICATING GROUP CONFLICT , 1989 .

[18]  A. Shehata,et al.  Not (Yet) a New Era of Minimal Effects , 2013 .

[19]  J. Hampton,et al.  The people's choice. , 2001, Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses.

[20]  Stephen D. Perry,et al.  Effects of news exemplification extended: Considerations of controversiality and perceived future opinion , 1997 .

[21]  Hans-Bernd Brosius,et al.  The Utility of Exemplars in Persuasive Communications , 1994 .

[22]  Jonathan Cohen,et al.  The Influence of Presumed Media Influence on Democratic Legitimacy , 2005, Commun. Res..

[23]  W. Bennett,et al.  A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication , 2008 .

[24]  E. Noelle-Neumann.  The Spiral of Silence A Theory of Public Opinion , 1974 .

[25]  M. Fiorina,et al.  Culture War?: The Myth of a Polarized America , 2004 .

[26]  J. David Kennamer,et al.  Self-Serving Biases in Perceiving the Opinions of Others , 1990 .

[27]  Kyu S. Hahn,et al.  Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Polarization in Media Use , 2007 .

[28]  Hubert J. O'Gorman,et al.  Pluralistic Ignorance—A Replication and Extension , 1976 .

[29]  D. Isenberg.  Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[30]  Larry M. Bartels.  Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice , 1988 .

[31]  Diana C. Mutz.  How the Mass Media Divide Us , 2006 .

[32]  Diana C. Mutz.  The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation , 2002 .

[33]  G. S. Sanders,et al.  Is social comparison irrelevant for producing choice shifts , 1977 .

[34]  Kyu S. Hahn,et al.  Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use , 2009 .

[35]  M. Bar-Hillel.  The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. , 1980 .

[36]  Gregor Daschmann.  VOX POP & POLLS: THE IMPACT OF POLL RESULTS AND VOTER STATEMENTS IN THE MEDIA ON THE PERCEPTION OF A CLIMATE OF OPINION , 2000 .

[37]  J. Hottois.  The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion—Our Social Skin . By Noelle-Neumann Elisabeth. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984. Pp. xi + 184. $20.00.) , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[38]  N. Stroud.  Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure , 2010 .

[39]  Charles S. Taber,et al.  Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs , 2006 .

[40]  Michael W. Traugott,et al.  The Accuracy of the National Preelection Polls in the 2004 Presidential Election , 2005 .

[41]  Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick,et al.  Selective Exposure and Reinforcement of Attitudes and Partisanship Before a Presidential Election , 2012 .

[42]  Elihu Katz,et al.  Publicity and Pluralistic Ignorance: Notes on ‘The Spiral of Silence’ , 1981 .

[43]  Natalie Jomini Stroud,et al.  Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure , 2008 .

[44]  D. Scheufele.  Spiral of Silence Theory , 2008 .

[45]  Raymond W. Preiss,et al.  The Spiral of Silence: A Meta-Analysis and Its Impact , 2006 .

[46]  Jonathan Cohen,et al.  The Influence of Presumed Media Influence on Strategic Voting , 2007, Commun. Res..

[47]  S. Herbst.  Public Expression Outside the Mainstream , 1996 .

[48]  J. Klapper.  Sociology of Mass Communication. , 1960 .

[49]  E. Katz.  And Deliver Us from Segmentation , 1996 .

[50]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership , 2008, The Journal of Politics.

[51]  Carroll J. Glynn,et al.  Spiral of Silence: Communication and Public Opinion as Social Control , 2014 .

[52]  Michael A. Krassa.  Social groups, selective perception, and behavioral contagion in public opinion , 1988 .

[53]  A. Gunther,et al.  Congenial public, contrary press, and biased estimates of the climate of opinion. , 2001, Public opinion quarterly.

[54]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  Reading Public Opinion: The Influence of News Coverage on Perceptions of Public Sentiment , 1997 .

[55]  Susanna Dilliplane,et al.  All the News You Want to Hear: The Impact of Partisan News Exposure on Political Participation , 2011 .

[56]  I. Janis.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[57]  Tamir Sheafer.  Detecting Campaign Effects in Imbalanced Campaigns , 2005 .

[58]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[59]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .