The influence of aggregate, filler and bitumen on asphalt mixture moisture damage

Abstract Moisture damage in an asphalt mixture can be defined as the loss of strength, stiffness and durability due to the presence of moisture leading to adhesive failure at the binder–aggregate interface and/or cohesive failure within the binder or binder–filler mastic. Various test methods exist to identify the susceptibility of asphalt mixtures to moisture damage, such as the AASHTO T283 procedure. This paper describes a new combined ageing/moisture damage laboratory test known as the Saturation Ageing Tensile Stiffness (SATS) test that has been successfully used to quantify the moisture damage of a range of UK asphalt mixtures. The test consists of initial saturation prior to placing compacted asphalt mixture cylindrical specimens in a moist, high temperature and pressure environment for an extended period of time. The stiffness modulus measured after the test divided by the stiffness modulus measured before the test (retained stiffness modulus), and the specimen saturation after the test (retained saturation), are used as an indication of the sensitivity of the compacted mixture to moisture damage. In this paper, the sensitivity of the SATS test to different aggregates, fillers, binders and volumetric proportions as well as mixture types has been assessed. The results show that the SATS test is able to discriminate between different asphalt mixture combinations in terms of their moisture damage resistance. Compared to AASHTO T283, the SATS test was found to be a more aggressive conditioning protocol, although both tests ranked mixtures in a similar order with respect to moisture damage.

[1]  D. Little,et al.  A synthesis of theories and mechanisms of bitumen-aggregate adhesion including recent advances in quantifying the effects of water , 2005 .

[2]  Dallas N. Little,et al.  MECHANISTIC EVALUATION OF MINERAL FILLERS ON FATIGUE RESISTANCE AND FUNDAMENTAL MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS , 2003 .

[3]  Tim Aschenbrener,et al.  EVALUATION OF HAMBURG WHEEL-TRACKING DEVICE TO PREDICT MOISTURE DAMAGE IN HOT MIX ASPHALT , 1995 .

[4]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  Moisture Damage Evaluation of Asphalt Mixtures by Considering Both Moisture Diffusion and Repeated-Load Conditions , 2003 .

[5]  Young-Kyu Choi,et al.  State of the Art Report on Moisture Sensitivity Test Methods for Bituminous Pavement Materials , 2002 .

[6]  Didier Lesueur,et al.  Effect of Hydrated Lime on Rheology, Fracture, and Aging of Bitumen , 1999 .

[7]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  Surface Energy Measurement of Asphalt and Its Application to Predicting Fatigue and Healing in Asphalt Mixtures , 2002 .

[8]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  Limits on Adhesive Bond Energy for Improved Resistance of Hot-Mix Asphalt to Moisture Damage , 2006 .

[9]  Andy Collop,et al.  Development of the saturation ageing tensile stiffness (SATS) test , 2004 .

[10]  A. Collop,et al.  Rheological and fracture characteristics of low penetration grade bitumen , 2004 .

[11]  Dallas N. Little,et al.  Effect of Mineral Fillers on Fatigue Resistance and Fundamental Material Characteristics: Mechanistic Evaluation , 2003 .

[12]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  Characterization of HMA Moisture Damage Using Surface Energy and Fracture Properties (With Discussion) , 2006 .

[13]  Andy Collop,et al.  Combined laboratory ageing/moisture sensitivity assessment of high modulus base asphalt mixtures , 2005 .

[14]  T W Kennedy,et al.  An evaluation of effectiveness of antistripping additives in protecting asphalt mixtures from moisture damage , 1991 .