Householder engagement with energy consumption feedback: the role of community action and communications

The provision of energy consumption feedback on in-home displays (IHDs) has a prominent role in government strategies for domestic energy demand reduction. Research suggests that IHDs can support energy consumption reduction, but also that engagement with IHDs can be limited to men and is often short-term. In this paper, we draw on research carried out in Smart Communities, a two-year project in which electricity and gas consumption feedback played a key role. This study was distinctive because it was accompanied by a weekly email communications programme and was provided within the context of community action. Project findings suggest that, although by no means panaceas, approaches such as these can support long-term engagement with energy consumption feedback, including by women, and can support behaviour change.

[1]  Harold Wilhite,et al.  Rethinking embodied knowledge and household consumption , 2014 .

[2]  Josep Espluga,et al.  A qualitative study of users' engagement with real-time feedback from in-house energy consumption displays , 2013 .

[3]  Tom Roberts,et al.  What is energy know-how, and how can it be shared and acquired? , 2015 .

[4]  Jeannet H. Van Houwelingen,et al.  The Effect of Goal-Setting and Daily Electronic Feedback on In-Home Energy Use , 1989 .

[5]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[6]  J. Thøgersen,et al.  Feedback on Household Electricity Consumption: Learning and Social Influence Processes , 2011 .

[7]  E. Shove.  Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality , 2003 .

[8]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[9]  H. Bradbury,et al.  Handbook of action research : participative inquiry and practice , 2001 .

[10]  Lucy Crane,et al.  The conditions of normal domestic life help explain homeowners' decision to renovate , 2013 .

[11]  Rebecca Ford,et al.  Personalized Energy Priorities: A User-Centric Application for Energy Advice , 2014, HCI.

[12]  James Valentine,et al.  Don't even think about it! , 2004 .

[13]  Sarah Royston,et al.  Dragon-breath and snow-melt: Know-how, experience and heat flows in the home , 2014 .

[14]  S. Pink.  Doing Sensory Ethnography , 2015 .

[15]  E. Shove.  Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change , 2010 .

[16]  Riccardo Russo,et al.  The question of energy reduction: The problem(s) with feedback , 2015 .

[17]  Rich Ling,et al.  Measured energy savings from a more informative energy bill , 1995 .

[18]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life: Smart Utopia? , 2013 .

[19]  Kevin Burchell,et al.  Marketing social norms: Social marketing and the ‘social norm approach’ , 2013 .

[20]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[21]  O. Dreĭer,et al.  Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives , 2007 .

[22]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Materializing energy , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[23]  SarahDarby,et al.  Smart metering: what potential for householder engagement? , 2010 .

[24]  Gabriel Chanan.  Local community involvement: A handbook for good practice , 1999 .

[25]  Y. Strengers.  Negotiating everyday life: The role of energy and water consumption feedback , 2011 .

[26]  Michael Nye,et al.  Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors , 2010 .

[27]  Sarah Mlynowski,et al.  Don't Even Think About It , 2014 .

[28]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[29]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes , 2012 .

[30]  S. S. van Dam,et al.  Home energy monitors: impact over the medium-term , 2010 .

[31]  L. Middlemiss,et al.  Influencing individual sustainability: a review of the evidence on the role of community-based organisations , 2008 .

[32]  E. Heiskanen,et al.  Low-carbon communities as a context for individual behavioural change , 2010 .

[33]  Kevin Burchell,et al.  Community, the very idea!: perspectives of participants in a demand-side community energy project , 2014 .

[34]  Kevin Burchell,et al.  Working together to save energy? Report of the Smart Communities project , 2014 .

[35]  Jessica Stromback,et al.  The potential of smart meter enabled programs to increase energy and systems efficiency: a mass pilot comparison Short name: Empower Demand , 2011 .

[36]  Niamh Murtagh,et al.  20∶60∶20 - Differences in Energy Behaviour and Conservation between and within Households with Electricity Monitors , 2014, PloS one.

[37]  C. Vlek,et al.  A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation , 2005 .

[38]  Michael Nye,et al.  Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term , 2013 .

[39]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Smart metering: what potential for householder engagement? , 2010 .

[40]  L. Middlemiss,et al.  The effects of community-based action for sustainability on participants' lifestyles , 2011 .

[41]  Neil Simcock,et al.  Factors influencing perceptions of domestic energy information: Content, source and process , 2014 .

[42]  D. D. Vaus,et al.  Surveys in Social Research , 1991 .