Disclosed corporate responses to climate change and stock performance: An international empirical analysis

This paper examines the relationship between disclosed corporate responses to climate change and stock performance on the European and US stock markets. Methodologically, we consider investor expectations and compare risk-adjusted returns of stock portfolios comprising corporations that differ in this indicator for environmental performance. In this respect, we apply the flexible Carhart four-factor model in addition to the restricted one-factor model based on the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). The main result of our portfolio analysis is that a trading strategy which consists of buying stocks of corporations disclosing responses to climate change and selling stocks of corporations with no disclosures has become more worthwhile over time in Europe. Furthermore, it can be shown that the relationship between disclosed corporate responses to climate change and stock performance has been positive for energy firms in the USA. One reason for these results could be the underlying stringency of institutional pressure with respect to global warming.

[1]  J. D. Diltz,et al.  U.S. Equity Markets and Environmental Policy. The Case of Electric Utility Investor Behavior During the Passage of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 , 2002 .

[2]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities , 1998 .

[3]  A. Beltratti Capital market equilibrium with externalities, production, and heterogeneous agents , 2005 .

[4]  M. Berkowitz Common Risk Factors in Explaining Canadian Equity Returns , 2001 .

[5]  R. Klassen,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance , 1999 .

[6]  George Halkos,et al.  Determinants of environmental management systems standards implementation: evidence from Greek industry , 2002 .

[7]  Smita B. Brunnermeier,et al.  Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries , 2003 .

[8]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[9]  S. Veith,et al.  Capital market response to emission rights returns: Evidence from the European power sector☆ , 2009 .

[10]  W. Newey,et al.  A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelationconsistent Covariance Matrix , 1986 .

[11]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective , 2001 .

[12]  Stephen A. Greyser,et al.  Sports sponsorship to rally the home team , 2007 .

[13]  Kathleen Segerson,et al.  Assessing Voluntary Programs to Improve Environmental Quality , 2002 .

[14]  R. Hodrick,et al.  High Idiosyncratic Volatility and Low Returns: International and Further U.S. Evidence , 2008 .

[15]  Alexander Kempf,et al.  The Effect of Socially Responsible Investing on Portfolio Performance , 2007 .

[16]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[17]  Jeffrey A. Busse,et al.  Short-Term Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance , 2005 .

[18]  T. Busch,et al.  Stakeholder engagement and environmental strategy – the case of climate change , 2010 .

[19]  R. Thaler,et al.  Does the Stock Market Overreact , 1985 .

[20]  L. Renneboog,et al.  Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior , 2008 .

[21]  G. Halkos,et al.  Can capital markets respond to environmental policy of firms? Evidence from Greece , 2007 .

[22]  Andrew King,et al.  Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[23]  R. Banz,et al.  The relationship between return and market value of common stocks , 1981 .

[24]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  Non-mandatory Approaches to Environmental Protection , 2002 .

[25]  E. Fama,et al.  First draft: August 2003 This draft: January 2004 The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence , 2004 .

[26]  Mark M. Carhart On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance , 1997 .

[27]  Andreas Lange,et al.  On the Self-Interested Use of Equity in International Climate Negotiations , 2009 .

[28]  K. Rouwenhorst,et al.  International Momentum Strategies , 1997 .

[29]  Kjetil Telle,et al.  “It Pays to be Green” – A Premature Conclusion? , 2006 .

[30]  A. Kraus,et al.  The Effect of Green Investment on Corporate Behavior , 2001, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[31]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  Does It Really Pay to Be Green? An Empirical Study of Firm Environmental and Financial Performance: An Empirical Study of Firm Environmental and Financial Performance , 2001 .

[32]  Greg Filbeck,et al.  The Relationship between the Environmental and Financial Performance of Public Utilities , 2004 .

[33]  A. Ziegler,et al.  Multifaktormodelle zur Erklärung deutscher Aktienrenditen: Eine empirische Analyse , 2007 .

[34]  E. Fama,et al.  Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies , 1996 .

[35]  S. Dasgupta,et al.  Pollution and Capital Markets in Developing Countries , 2001 .

[36]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  The corporate social performance-financial performance link , 1997 .

[37]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[38]  Rob Bauer,et al.  International Evidence on Ethical Mutual Fund Performance and Investment Style , 2002 .

[39]  Denis Cormier,et al.  The revisited contribution of environmental reporting to investors' valuation of a firm's earnings: An international perspective , 2007 .

[40]  K. Geert Rouwenhorst,et al.  The structure of international stock returns and the integration of capital markets , 1995 .

[41]  W. Sharpe A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis , 1963 .

[42]  Michael Schröder,et al.  Cross-Sectional Tests of Conditional Asset Pricing Models: Evidence from the German Stock Market , 2007 .

[43]  Andreas R. Ziegler,et al.  The Effect of Environmental and Social Performance on the Stock Performance of European Corporations , 2007 .

[44]  N. Stern The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[45]  V. Hoffmann,et al.  How Hot Is Your Bottom Line? Linking Carbon and Financial Performance , 2011 .

[46]  Brett A. Stone,et al.  Socially Responsible Investments , 2007 .

[47]  C. Garcés‐Ayerbe,et al.  ISO 14001 Environmental Certification: A Sign Valued by the Market? , 2009 .

[48]  Shameek Konar,et al.  Information As Regulation: The Effect of Community Right to Know Laws on Toxic Emissions , 1997 .

[49]  J. Tirole The theory of corporate finance , 2006 .

[50]  María J. Montes-Sancho,et al.  Deregulation and environmental differentiation in the electric utility industry , 2007 .

[51]  Rob Bauer,et al.  The Economic Value of Corporate Eco‐Efficiency , 2006 .

[52]  S. Dasgupta,et al.  Disclosure of Environmental Violations and the Stock Market in the Republic of Korea , 2004 .

[53]  A. Shleifer,et al.  A Survey of Corporate Governance , 1996 .

[54]  Dieter Cansier,et al.  Air pollutant taxation: an empirical survey , 1997 .

[55]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[56]  M. Friedman The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits , 2007 .

[57]  E. Fama,et al.  The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns , 1992 .

[58]  G. Heal,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: An Economic and Financial Framework , 2005 .

[59]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  DOES IT PAY TO BE GREEN? AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMISSION REDUCTION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 1996 .

[60]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications , 2006 .

[61]  Rob Bauer,et al.  The Ethical Mutual Fund Performance Debate: New Evidence from Canada , 2007 .

[62]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Dismantling of a Breakthrough: The Kyoto Protocol - Just Symbolic Policy! , 2002 .

[63]  J. Lintner THE VALUATION OF RISK ASSETS AND THE SELECTION OF RISKY INVESTMENTS IN STOCK PORTFOLIOS AND CAPITAL BUDGETS , 1965 .

[64]  E. Fama,et al.  Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds , 1993 .

[65]  Marc Orlitzky,et al.  Does Firm Size Comfound the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance? , 2001 .

[66]  Andre F. Perold,et al.  The Capital Asset Pricing Model , 2004 .

[67]  Narasimhan Jegadeesh,et al.  Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency , 1993 .

[68]  Michael L. Barnett,et al.  Beyond Dichotomy: The Curvilinear Relationship between Social Responsibility and Financial Performance , 2006 .

[69]  Shreekant Gupta,et al.  Do Stock Markets Penalise Environment-Unfriendly Behaviour? Evidence from India , 2003 .

[70]  Eli Berman,et al.  Environmental Regulation and Productivity: Evidence from Oil Refineries , 1998 .

[71]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  Toxics Release Information: A Policy Tool for Environmental Protection , 1998 .

[72]  G. M. Gallarotti,et al.  It pays to be green: The managerial incentive structure and environmentally sound strategies , 1995 .

[73]  Rob Bauer,et al.  The Eco-Efficiency Premium Puzzle , 2004 .

[74]  Jean-Marc Suret,et al.  EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE FOUR-FACTOR PRICING MODEL FROM THE CANADIAN STOCK MARKET , 2004 .

[75]  David L. Levy,et al.  Corporate Responses in an Emerging Climate Regime: The Institutionalization and Commensuration of Carbon Disclosure , 2008 .