Dynamic sensory cues shape song structure in Drosophila

The generation of acoustic communication signals is widespread across the animal kingdom, and males of many species, including Drosophilidae, produce patterned courtship songs to increase their chance of success with a female. For some animals, song structure can vary considerably from one rendition to the next; neural noise within pattern generating circuits is widely assumed to be the primary source of such variability, and statistical models that incorporate neural noise are successful at reproducing the full variation present in natural songs. In direct contrast, here we demonstrate that much of the pattern variability in Drosophila courtship song can be explained by taking into account the dynamic sensory experience of the male. In particular, using a quantitative behavioural assay combined with computational modelling, we find that males use fast modulations in visual and self-motion signals to pattern their songs, a relationship that we show is evolutionarily conserved. Using neural circuit manipulations, we also identify the pathways involved in song patterning choices and show that females are sensitive to song features. Our data not only demonstrate that Drosophila song production is not a fixed action pattern, but establish Drosophila as a valuable new model for studies of rapid decision-making under both social and naturalistic conditions.

[1]  M. Dickinson,et al.  A New Chamber for Studying the Behavior of Drosophila , 2010, PloS one.

[2]  Liliane Schoofs,et al.  SIFamide is a highly conserved neuropeptide: a comparative study in different insect species. , 2004, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[3]  B. Dickson Wired for Sex: The Neurobiology of Drosophila Mating Decisions , 2008, Science.

[4]  Dezhe Z. Jin,et al.  A Compact Statistical Model of the Song Syntax in Bengalese Finch , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  William Bialek,et al.  Analyzing Neural Responses to Natural Signals: Maximally Informative Dimensions , 2002, Neural Computation.

[6]  M. Brass,et al.  Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  L. Griffith,et al.  Song Choice Is Modulated by Female Movement in Drosophila Males , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  D. J. Mcfarland Decision making in animals , 1977, Nature.

[9]  M. Göpfert,et al.  Drosophila Auditory Organ Genes and Genetic Hearing Defects , 2012, Cell.

[10]  Simon Barthelmé,et al.  Improved classification images with sparse priors in a smooth basis. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[11]  R. Hoy,et al.  The neurobiology of cricket song. , 1974, Scientific American.

[12]  F. Schilcher,et al.  The role of auditory stimuli in the courtship of Drosophila melanogaster , 1976, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  M. Fee,et al.  Two Distinct Modes of Forebrain Circuit Dynamics Underlie Temporal Patterning in the Vocalizations of Young Songbirds , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  B. Dickson,et al.  A receptor that mediates the post-mating switch in Drosophila reproductive behaviour , 2008, Nature.

[15]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[16]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Discriminating External and Internal Causes for Heading Changes in Freely Flying Drosophila , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  William Rowan,et al.  The Study of Instinct , 1953 .

[18]  Gregory F Ball,et al.  Neural Mechanisms for the Coordination of Duet Singing in Wrens , 2011, Science.

[19]  Mala Murthy,et al.  Multi-channel acoustic recording and automated analysis of Drosophila courtship songs , 2013, BMC Biology.

[20]  Aaron S. Andalman,et al.  Vocal Experimentation in the Juvenile Songbird Requires a Basal Ganglia Circuit , 2005, PLoS biology.

[21]  Sarah M. N. Woolley,et al.  A Generalized Linear Model for Estimating Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields from Responses to Natural Sounds , 2011, PloS one.

[22]  A. Ewing,et al.  The neuromuscular basis of courtship song inDrosophila: The role of the direct and axillary wing muscles , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[23]  H. C. Bennet-Clark,et al.  Pulse interval as a critical parameter in the courtship song of Drosophila melanogaster , 1969 .

[24]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Limits of Predictability in Human Mobility , 2010, Science.

[25]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population , 2008, Nature.

[26]  Andrew C. Lin,et al.  Different Kenyon Cell Populations Drive Learned Approach and Avoidance in Drosophila , 2013, Neuron.

[27]  Joshua W. Shaevitz,et al.  Efficient Multiple Object Tracking Using Mutually Repulsive Active Membranes , 2012, PloS one.

[28]  Barry J. Dickson,et al.  fruitless Splicing Specifies Male Courtship Behavior in Drosophila , 2005, Cell.

[29]  Jeffrey C. Hall,et al.  Are Complex Behaviors Specified by Dedicated Regulatory Genes? Reasoning from Drosophila , 2001, Cell.

[30]  Y. Grosjean,et al.  The smell of love in Drosophila , 2013, Front. Physiol..

[31]  J. C. Hall The mating of a fly. , 1994, Science.

[32]  Michael S. Brainard,et al.  Online Contributions of Auditory Feedback to Neural Activity in Avian Song Control Circuitry , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Sakata,et al.  Real-Time Contributions of Auditory Feedback to Avian Vocal Motor Control , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  James W Truman,et al.  Motor control of Drosophila courtship song. , 2013, Cell reports.