Predicting Patterns of Information Systems Alignment in Entrepreneurial Organizations

Organizations expend a great deal of effort managing their information system resources as they try to achieve information systems alignment (ISA), but relatively little is known about the different ways in which alignment changes over time in different organizations or what factors predict which kinds of changes are likely to occur. The purpose of this paper is to examine the factors that predict the patterns of ISA change in entrepreneurial organizations. An in-depth examination of the alignment process was conducted using two retrospective case studies. Continuous Change Theory and Punctuated Equilibrium Theory were used to explore ISA patterns in the two organizations. Longitudinal qualitative and quantitative data from the two organizations were used to compare the predictive ability of the two theories regarding ISA changes over time. Results suggest that two factors, organizational inertia and institutionalism, predict the likelihood of an entrepreneurial organization following one ISA change pattern over another.

[1]  Patricia J. Daugherty,et al.  A COST AND IMPACT TYPOLOGY OF LOGISTICS TECHNOLOGY AND THE EFFECT OF ITS ADOPTION ON ORGANIZATIONAL PRACTICE , 1994 .

[2]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[3]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[4]  Ron Weber,et al.  Alignment in Enterprise Systems Implementations: The Role of Ontological Distance , 2004, ICIS.

[5]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution? , 2000, CACM.

[6]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[7]  Joe Peppard,et al.  Beyond Alignment: A Coevolutionary View of the Information Systems Strategy Process , 2003 .

[8]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Reflecting on the Strategy Process , 1999 .

[9]  Jerry N. Luftman.  Assessing Business-IT Alignment Maturity , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  IT alignment: what have we learned? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[11]  L. Greiner.  Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow , 1997 .

[12]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[13]  Kathryn Graziano.  The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail , 1998 .

[14]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[15]  M. Sastry.  Problems and Paradoxes in a Model of Punctuated Organizational Change , 1997 .

[16]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Transformation as Punctuated Equilibrium: An Empirical Test , 1994 .

[17]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[18]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note , 1992 .

[19]  SabherwalRajiv,et al.  Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies , 2001 .

[20]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Influence of IT Management Practice on IT Use in Large Organizations , 1994, MIS Q..

[21]  G. Huber.  The Nature and Design of Post-Industrial Organizations , 1984 .

[22]  R. Larsson.  Case Survey Methodology: Quantitative Analysis of Patterns Across Case Studies , 1993 .

[23]  C. Gersick.  REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .

[24]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[25]  Hind Benbya,et al.  Using coevolutionary and complexity theories to improve IS alignment: a multi-level approach , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[26]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[27]  Yolande E. Chan.  Why Haven't We Mastered Alignment? The Importance of the Informal Organization Structure , 2002, MIS Q. Executive.

[28]  Nick Rackoff,et al.  SIM Competition Paper: Information Systems for Competitive Advantage: Implemenation of a Planning Process , 1985, MIS Q..

[29]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[30]  Alan D. Meyer,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL JOLTS AND INDUSTRY REVOLUTIONS: ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSES TO DISCONTINUOUS CHANGE , 1990 .

[31]  C. Wiseman,et al.  Information systems for competitive advantage: implementation of a planning process , 1990 .

[32]  Janice M. Burn.  Information systems strategies and the management of organizational change – a strategic alignment model , 1993, J. Inf. Technol..

[33]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Change. Principles of Problem Formation and Problem Resolution. New York (Norton) 1974. , 1974 .

[34]  Janice M. Burn,et al.  IS innovation and organizational alignment — a professional juggling act , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[35]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[36]  Tammy E. Beck,et al.  RADICAL CHANGE ACCIDENTALLY: THE EMERGENCE AND AMPLIFICATION OF SMALL CHANGE , 2007 .

[37]  Nicolaj Siggelkow.  Evolution toward Fit , 2002 .

[38]  S. Gould.  The Structure of Evolutionary Theory , 2002 .

[39]  R. Veliyath.  Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering , 1996 .

[40]  B. Golden.  Further Remarks on Retrospective Accounts on Organizational and Strategic Management Research , 1997 .

[41]  Heather A. Haveman,et al.  Organizational Environments in Flux: The Impact of Regulatory Punctuations on Organizational Domains, CEO Succession, and Performance , 2001 .

[42]  Louis Anthony Cox,et al.  Wiley encyclopedia of operations research and management science , 2011 .

[43]  Leiser Silva,et al.  Fighting Against Windmills: Strategic Information Systems and Organizational Deep Structures , 2007, MIS Q..

[44]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  The Dynamics of Alignment: Insights from a Punctuated Equilibrium Model , 2001 .

[45]  S. Gass,et al.  Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science , 1997 .

[46]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[47]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Exploring the Role of Information Technology in Organizational Downsizing: A Tale of Two American Cities , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[48]  Stanley H. Cohen,et al.  Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. , 1975 .

[49]  Richard L. Nolan,et al.  Managing the computer resource , 1973, Commun. ACM.

[50]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Measuring the Linkage Between Business and Information Technology Objectives , 1996, MIS Q..

[52]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[53]  A. V. D. Ven.  SUGGESTIONS FOR STUDYING STRATEGY PROCESS: A RESEARCH NOTE , 1992 .

[54]  Suresh Kotha,et al.  Continuous “Morphing”: Competing Through Dynamic Capabilities, Form, and Function , 2001 .