The Case for Shared Nothing
暂无分享,去创建一个
There are three dominent themes in building high transaction rate multiprocessor systems, namely shared memory (e.g. Synapse, IBM/AP configurations), shared disk (e.g. VAX/cluster, any multi-ported disk system), and shared nothing (e.g. Tandem, Tolerant). This paper argues that shared nothing is the preferred approach.
[1] Andreas Reuter,et al. Concurrency on high-traffic data elements , 1982, PODS.
[2] Michael Stonebraker,et al. A measure of transaction processing power , 1985 .