Mobile Applications for Participation at the Shopping Mall: Content Analysis and Usability for Persons with Physical Disabilities and Communication or Cognitive Limitations

The aim of this exploratory study was to determine the important features in content and usability of existing mobile applications evaluating environmental barriers and facilitators (EBF) to participation for persons with physical disabilities presenting mild communication or cognitive limitations. A rigorous process based on a user-centered design approach led to the identification of two relevant mobile applications to evaluate the EBF. An accessibility expert, the research team as well as five users then tested the mobile applications in a shopping mall. A thematic content analysis of the research team’s and users’ comments established 10 categories of key features that adequately respond to the needs of the clientele targeted in this study. In terms of content, granularity and contextualization of the information provided were considered important. With respect to usability, relevant features were place finding, rating system, presentation of results, compatibility, user-friendliness, aesthetics, credibility of the information as well as connectivity/interactiveness. The research team and the users agreed on some aspects such as aesthetics, but had different perspectives on features such as the rating system or the connectivity/interactiveness of the application. The users proposed new features suggesting that the existing mobile applications did not correspond to all their needs.

[1]  Constance M. Johnson,et al.  Implementation of a user-centered framework in the development of a web-based health information database and call center , 2011, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[2]  Marc Filser,et al.  La valeur du comportement de magasinage. Statut théorique et apports au positionnement de l'enseigne , 2004 .

[3]  ANNETTE DE VITO DABBS,et al.  User-Centered Design and Interactive Health Technologies for Patients , 2009, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[4]  Hélène Pigot,et al.  Étude de convivialité de l’utilisation d’un agenda électronique par des personnes souffrant de schizophrénie , 2008 .

[5]  William R. King,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[6]  M. Minkler,et al.  Photovoice: A Review of the Literature in Health and Public Health , 2010, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[7]  P. Lindenauer,et al.  Hospital workers’ perceptions of waste: a qualitative study involving photo-elicitation , 2013, BMJ quality & safety.

[8]  James R. Lewis Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire: The PSSUQ , 1992 .

[9]  Luc P de Witte,et al.  User-centered development and testing of a monitoring system that provides feedback regarding physical functioning to elderly people , 2013, Patient preference and adherence.

[10]  Kerri A Morgan,et al.  A subjective measure of environmental facilitators and barriers to participation for people with mobility limitations , 2008, Disability and rehabilitation.

[11]  T. Jarus,et al.  A Scoping Review of the Photovoice Method: Implications for Occupational Therapy Research , 2012, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[12]  K. Hergenrather,et al.  Photovoice as community-based participatory research: a qualitative review. , 2009, American journal of health behavior.

[13]  S. Blackstone,et al.  Communication Access to Businesses and Organizations for People with Complex Communication Needs , 2012, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[14]  Neuropsychologie : son apport dans l'expertise des traumatisés crâniens adultes , 2006 .

[15]  Janice Light,et al.  Communicative Competence for Individuals who require Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A New Definition for a New Era of Communication? , 2014, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[16]  G. L. Dorze,et al.  Faire des courses avec des atteintes cognitives : l’influence des facteurs environnementaux , 2014 .

[17]  B. Leipert,et al.  Photovoice and its potential use in nutrition and dietetic research. , 2010, Canadian journal of dietetic practice and research : a publication of Dietitians of Canada = Revue canadienne de la pratique et de la recherche en dietetique : une publication des Dietetistes du Canada.

[18]  C. LeRouge,et al.  A qualitative, exploratory study of predominantly female parental perceptions of consumer health technology use by their overweight and/or obese female adolescent participating in a fee-based 4-week weight-management intervention. , 2014, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

[19]  Nicol Nijland,et al.  A Holistic Framework to Improve the Uptake and Impact of eHealth Technologies , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[20]  Marc Filser,et al.  La valeur du comportement de magasinage , 2004 .

[21]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[22]  E. Power,et al.  Describing conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and communication partners following communication partner training: Using exchange structure analysis , 2013, Brain injury.

[23]  B. Swaine,et al.  Making sense of pragmatic criteria for the selection of geriatric rehabilitation measurement tools. , 2006, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[24]  J P Lane,et al.  The voice of the customer: consumers define the ideal battery charger. , 1997, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[25]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[26]  Janice Light,et al.  The iPad and Mobile Technology Revolution: Benefits and Challenges for Individuals who require Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2013, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[27]  Maria Barile,et al.  Exploring the facilitators and barriers to shopping mall use by persons with disabilities and strategies for improvements: Perspectives from persons with disabilities, rehabilitation professionals and shopkeepers , 2014 .

[28]  James R. Lewis,et al.  Psychometric evaluation of an after-scenario questionnaire for computer usability studies: the ASQ , 1991, SGCH.