PET/CT (and CT) instrumentation, image reconstruction and data transfer for radiotherapy planning.

The positron emission tomography in combination with CT in hybrid, cross-modality imaging systems (PET/CT) gains more and more importance as a part of the treatment-planning procedure in radiotherapy. Positron emission tomography (PET), as a integral part of nuclear medicine imaging and non-invasive imaging technique, offers the visualization and quantification of pre-selected tracer metabolism. In combination with the structural information from CT, this molecular imaging technique has great potential to support and improve the outcome of the treatment-planning procedure prior to radiotherapy. By the choice of the PET-Tracer, a variety of different metabolic processes can be visualized. First and foremost, this is the glucose metabolism of a tissue as well as for instance hypoxia or cell proliferation. This paper comprises the system characteristics of hybrid PET/CT systems. Acquisition and processing protocols are described in general and modifications to cope with the special needs in radiooncology. This starts with the different position of the patient on a special table top, continues with the use of the same fixation material as used for positioning of the patient in radiooncology while simulation and irradiation and leads to special processing protocols that include the delineation of the volumes that are subject to treatment planning and irradiation (PTV, GTV, CTV, etc.). General CT acquisition and processing parameters as well as the use of contrast enhancement of the CT are described. The possible risks and pitfalls the investigator could face during the hybrid-imaging procedure are explained and listed. The interdisciplinary use of different imaging modalities implies a increase of the volume of data created. These data need to be stored and communicated fast, safe and correct. Therefore, the DICOM-Standard provides objects and classes for this purpose (DICOM RT). Furthermore, the standard DICOM objects and classes for nuclear medicine (NM, PT) and computed tomography (CT) are used to communicate the actual image data created by the modalities. Care must be taken for data security, especially when transferring data across the (network-) borders of different hospitals. Overall, the most important precondition for successful integration of functional imaging in RT treatment planning is the goal orientated as well as close and thorough communication between nuclear medicine and radiotherapy departments on all levels of interaction (personnel, imaging protocols, GTV delineation, and selection of the data transfer method).

[1]  C. Claussen,et al.  Value of contrast-enhanced multiphase CT in combined PET/CT protocols for oncological imaging. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  T. Pan,et al.  Analysis of the dependence of PET/CT quantification on iterative reconstruction parameters , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[3]  R. Hicks,et al.  Where do we draw the line? Contouring tumors on positron emission tomography/computed tomography. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Willi A. Kalender,et al.  Computed tomography : fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications , 2000 .

[5]  J. Webb Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes and Contrast Media , 2009 .

[6]  S. Fernbach,et al.  Case 52: gastric teratoma. , 2002, Radiology.

[7]  W E Snyder,et al.  Performance evaluation of filtered backprojection reconstruction and iterative reconstruction methods for PET images , 1998, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[8]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Is LSO the future of PET? , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  Ursula Nestle,et al.  Biological imaging in radiation therapy: role of positron emission tomography , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  W. Burchert,et al.  Iodine-124 PET dosimetry in differentiated thyroid cancer: recovery coefficient in 2D and 3D modes for PET(/CT) systems , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in the presence of truncation artifacts. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  Cai Grau,et al.  Dose painting: art or science? , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  Impact of metallic dental implants on CT-based attenuation correction in a combined PET/CT scanner , 2003, European Radiology.

[15]  P. Evans Anatomical imaging for radiotherapy , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  H. Thomsen,et al.  ESUR guidelines on contrast media , 2006, Abdominal Imaging.

[17]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Dual cardiac–respiratory gated PET: implementation and results from a feasibility study , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  Anne Bol,et al.  Tri-dimensional automatic segmentation of PET volumes based on measured source-to-background ratios: influence of reconstruction algorithms. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  S. Hou,et al.  Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. , 2002, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[20]  Quantitative Effects of Contrast Enhanced CT Attenuation Correction on PET SUV Measurements , 2008, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[21]  Soo Chin Liew,et al.  Description of a simultaneous emission-transmission CT system , 1990, Medical Imaging.

[22]  Karin Haustermans,et al.  PET-based treatment planning in radiotherapy: a new standard? , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  David Binns,et al.  A prospective study to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET on CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning for oesophageal cancer. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[24]  Florian Büther,et al.  Effective Methods to Correct Contrast Agent–Induced Errors in PET Quantification in Cardiac PET/CT , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  김주희,et al.  Optimal Delay Time for the Hepatic Parenchymal Enhancement at the Multidetector CT Examination , 2006 .

[26]  R. Hicks,et al.  Role of PET-CT in the Optimization of Thoracic Radiotherapy , 2006, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[27]  C C Ling,et al.  The deep inspiration breath-hold technique in the treatment of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  V. Bettinardi,et al.  An automatic classification technique for attenuation correction in positron emission tomography , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  K. Sugimura,et al.  Performance of integrated FDG PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent colorectal cancer: Comparison with integrated FDG PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and enhanced CT , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[30]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  D. Visvikis,et al.  The role of PET/CT scanning in radiotherapy planning. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[32]  J. Cohen,et al.  Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency: a prospective study. , 1983, The American journal of medicine.

[33]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[34]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Benefit of Time-of-Flight in PET: Experimental and Clinical Results , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[35]  L. Specht,et al.  Clinical impact of FDG‐PET/CT in the planning of radiotherapy for early‐stage Hodgkin lymphoma , 2007, European journal of haematology.

[36]  H. Thomsen,et al.  Contrast-medium-induced nephropathy: is there a new consensus? A review of published guidelines , 2006, European Radiology.

[37]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Acquisition protocol considerations for combined PET/CT imaging. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[38]  W. Oyen,et al.  FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0 , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[39]  A. Megibow,et al.  Dilute barium as a contrast agent for abdominal CT. , 1980, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[40]  M C Gilardi,et al.  PET/CT and radiotherapy. , 2006, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[41]  R. Raupach,et al.  Combined 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging of the head and neck , 2006, Nuklearmedizin.

[42]  K. Bae,et al.  Efficient correction for CT image artifacts caused by objects extending outside the scan field of view. , 2000, Medical physics.

[43]  J. Heiken,et al.  Helical/spiral computed body tomography. , 1997, Clinical radiology.

[44]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Dual-modality PET/CT scanning with negative oral contrast agent to avoid artifacts: introduction and evaluation. , 2004, Radiology.

[45]  P. Silverman,et al.  Common terminology for single and multislice helical CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[46]  J. Webb Prevention of Acute Reactions , 2006 .

[47]  N. Willich,et al.  [FDG-PET/CT in oncology. German Guideline]. , 2007, Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine.

[48]  A. Pevsner,et al.  The CT motion quantitation of lung lesions and its impact on PET-measured SUVs. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[49]  W A Kalender,et al.  Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies. , 1999, Medical physics.

[50]  Roland Bares,et al.  Low dose non-enhanced CT versus standard dose contrast-enhanced CT in combined PET/CT protocols for staging and therapy planning in non-small cell lung cancer , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[51]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  A novel iterative method for lesion delineation and volumetric quantification with FDG PET , 2007, Nuclear medicine communications.

[52]  David W. Townsend,et al.  Positon emission tomography: basic science and clinical practice , 2008 .

[53]  R. Lewitt Alternatives to voxels for image representation in iterative reconstruction algorithms , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[54]  Frank P DiFilippo,et al.  Do implanted pacemaker leads and ICD leads cause metal-related artifact in cardiac PET/CT? , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[55]  Ronald Nutt,et al.  Is LSO the future of PET? , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[56]  Yasuaki Arai,et al.  Non-enhanced CT versus contrast-enhanced CT in integrated PET/CT studies for nodal staging of rectal cancer , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[57]  Yuji Nakamoto,et al.  Clinically significant inaccurate localization of lesions with PET/CT: frequency in 300 patients. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[58]  Steven R. Meikle,et al.  Quantitative Techniques in PET , 2005 .

[59]  R. Nutt,et al.  A Multicrystal Two Dimensional BGO Detector System for Positron Emission Tomography , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[60]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  Modeling and incorporation of system response functions in 3-D whole body PET , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[61]  Tinsu Pan,et al.  Quantifying the effect of IV contrast media on integrated PET/CT: clinical evaluation. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[62]  J. Ellis,et al.  Frequency, outcome, and appropriateness of treatment of nonionic iodinated contrast media reactions. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[63]  Marc Kachelriess,et al.  Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[64]  Henrik S. Thomsen,et al.  Effect of iodinated contrast media on thyroid function in adults , 2004, European Radiology.

[65]  Dale L. Bailey,et al.  Data Acquisition and Performance Characterization in PET , 2005 .

[66]  D. Ott,et al.  Gastrointestinal Contrast Agents: Indications, Uses, and Risks , 1983 .

[67]  A. Valentine,et al.  Iopentol (Imagopaque® 350) compared with diatrizoate (Urografin® 370) in cerebral CT A clinical trial assessing immediate and late (7 days) adverse events and diagnostic information (visualization quality and Hounsfield unit measurements) , 1997, European Radiology.

[68]  W. Moses Time of flight in PET revisited , 2003 .

[69]  T. Beyer,et al.  Optimized intravenous contrast administration for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[71]  N. Willich,et al.  FDG-PET/CT in oncology , 2007, Nuklearmedizin.

[72]  D. Fleischmann Use of high-concentration contrast media in multiple-detector-row CT: principles and rationale , 2003, European Radiology.

[73]  F. Mannting,et al.  Artifactual 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose localization surrounding metallic objects in a PET/CT scanner using CT-based attenuation correction. , 2003, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[74]  K. Sugimura,et al.  Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent uterine cancer: comparison with PET and enhanced CT , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[75]  J. Knuuti,et al.  Performance of the new generation of whole-body PET/CT scanners: Discovery STE and Discovery VCT , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[76]  H. Thomsen European Society of Urogenital Radiology guidelines on contrast media application , 2007, Current opinion in urology.

[77]  R. Kessler,et al.  Analysis of emission tomographic scan data: limitations imposed by resolution and background. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[78]  H. Thomsen Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes and Contrast Media , 2006 .

[79]  K. Sugimura,et al.  Performance of integrated FDG–PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer: comparison with integrated FDG–PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and enhanced CT , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[80]  Maurizio Conti,et al.  First experimental results of time-of-flight reconstruction on an LSO PET scanner , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[81]  Paul E. Kinahan,et al.  PET Image Reconstruction , 2005 .

[82]  R. Solomon,et al.  Contrast-medium-induced acute renal failure. , 1998, Kidney international.

[83]  D. DeLong,et al.  Determining contrast medium dose and rate on basis of lean body weight: does this strategy improve patient-to-patient uniformity of hepatic enhancement during multi-detector row CT? , 2007, Radiology.

[84]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[85]  M. Kanematsu,et al.  Pancreas: optimal scan delay for contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT. , 2006, Radiology.

[86]  M. Ter-pogossian,et al.  Feasibility of time-of-flight reconstruction in positron emission tomography. , 1980, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[87]  S. Nekolla,et al.  Attenuation correction in cardiac PET/CT with three different CT protocols: a comparison with conventional PET , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[88]  M. L. R. D. Christenson Incidental Pulmonary Emboli in Oncology Patients: Prevalence, CT Evaluation, and Natural History , 2007 .

[89]  T. Hany,et al.  How much intravenous contrast is needed in FDG-PET/CT? , 2005, Nuklearmedizin.

[90]  R. Boellaard Standards for PET Image Acquisition and Quantitative Data Analysis , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[91]  S S Gambhir,et al.  A tabulated summary of the FDG PET literature. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[92]  C. Rübe,et al.  Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[93]  Holger Greess,et al.  Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers , 1999, European Radiology.

[94]  M. Mahesh Search for isotropic resolution in CT from conventional through multiple-row detector. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[95]  T. K. Narayan,et al.  Evaluation of task-oriented performance of several fully 3D PET reconstruction algorithms. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[96]  K. Hausegger,et al.  Clinical experience with a commercially available negative oral contrast medium in PET/CT. , 2005, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[97]  David W Townsend,et al.  From 3-D positron emission tomography to 3-D positron emission tomography/computed tomography: what did we learn? , 2004, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[98]  Anne Bol,et al.  A gradient-based method for segmenting FDG-PET images: methodology and validation , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[99]  W. Ambrosius,et al.  Spiral CT with ionic and nonionic contrast material: evaluation of patient motion and scan quality. , 1998, Radiology.

[100]  O. Ratib,et al.  Cardiac pacemakers and central venous lines can induce focal artifacts on CT-corrected PET images. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[101]  M. King,et al.  SPECT volume quantitation: influence of spatial resolution, source size and shape, and voxel size. , 1991, Medical physics.

[102]  S. Herman Computed Tomography Contrast Enhancement Principles and the Use of High-Concentration Contrast Media , 2004, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[103]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[104]  T. Beyer,et al.  Kombinierte 18F-FDG-PET/CTBildgebung im HNO-Bereich: ein Ansatz zur Korrektur von Metallartefakten , 2006 .

[105]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[106]  P.E. Kinahan,et al.  Modeling and incorporation of system response functions in 3D whole body PET , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[107]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Respiration artifacts in whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT studies with combined PET/CT tomographs employing spiral CT technology with 1 to 16 detector rows , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[108]  G. Goerres,et al.  Do hardware artefacts influence the performance of head and neck PET scans in patients with oral cavity squamous cell cancer? , 2003, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[109]  M. Mahesh The AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents , 2002 .

[110]  C.C. Watson Image Noise Variance in 3D OSEM Reconstruction of Clinical Time-of-Flight PET , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[111]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Optimized contrast-enhanced CT protocols for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT: technical aspects of single-phase versus multiphase CT imaging. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[112]  Michel Defrise,et al.  Image Reconstruction Algorithms in PET , 2005 .

[113]  D. Townsend Multimodality imaging of structure and function , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[114]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Performance standards in positron emission tomography. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[115]  F. R. Verdun,et al.  Image quality and dose in spiral computed tomography , 2004, European Radiology.

[116]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  Artifacts at PET and PET/CT caused by metallic hip prosthetic material. , 2003, Radiology.