Cognitive Spare Capacity as an Index of Listening Effort.

Everyday listening may be experienced as effortful, especially by individuals with hearing loss. This may be due to internal factors, such as cognitive load, and external factors, such as noise. Even when speech is audible, internal and external factors may combine to reduce cognitive spare capacity, or the ability to engage in cognitive processing of spoken information. A better understanding of cognitive spare capacity and how it can be optimally allocated may guide new approaches to rehabilitation and ultimately improve outcomes. This article presents results of three tests of cognitive spare capacity:1. Sentence-final Word Identification and Recall (SWIR) test2. Cognitive Spare Capacity Test (CSCT)3. Auditory Inference Span Test (AIST)Results show that noise reduces cognitive spare capacity even when speech intelligibility is retained. In addition, SWIR results show that hearing aid signal processing can increase cognitive spare capacity, and CSCT and AIST results show that increasing load reduces cognitive spare capacity. Correlational evidence suggests that while the effect of noise on cognitive spare capacity is related to working memory capacity, the effect of load is related to executive function. Future studies should continue to investigate how hearing aid signal processing can mitigate the effect of load on cognitive spare capacity, and whether such effects can be enhanced by developing executive skills through training. The mechanisms modulating cognitive spare capacity should be investigated by studying their neural correlates, and tests of cognitive spare capacity should be developed for clinical use in conjunction with developing new approaches to rehabilitation.

[1]  Liang Li,et al.  The effect of energetic and informational masking on the time-course of stream segregation: Evidence that streaming depends on vocal fine structure cues , 2012 .

[2]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Assessing listening effort by measuring short-term memory storage and processing of speech in noise , 2014 .

[3]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Using Speech Recall in Hearing Aid Fitting and Outcome Evaluation Under Ecological Test Conditions , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[4]  Karolina Smeds,et al.  Estimation of Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Sound Scenarios. , 2015, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[5]  T. Lunner,et al.  Cognitive Spare Capacity and Speech Communication: A Narrative Overview , 2014, BioMed research international.

[6]  P. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  Neurocognitive Aging and the Compensation Hypothesis , 2008 .

[7]  Joost M Festen,et al.  How Linguistic Closure and Verbal Working Memory Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise—A Review , 2013, Trends in amplification.

[8]  Ingrid S. Johnsrude,et al.  The eye as a window to the listening brain: Neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load , 2014, NeuroImage.

[9]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review , 2012 .

[10]  Jerker Rönnberg,et al.  The influence of non-native language proficiency on speech perception performance , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[11]  Sushmit Mishra,et al.  Exploring Cognitive Spare Capacity : Executive Processing of Degraded Speech , 2014 .

[12]  T. Lunner,et al.  Seeing the Talker's Face Improves Free Recall of Speech for Young Adults With Normal Hearing but Not Older Adults With Hearing Loss. , 2016, Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research.

[13]  Camarin E. Rolle,et al.  Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults , 2013, Nature.

[14]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers , 2015, Trends in hearing.

[15]  Sotaro Kita,et al.  On-line Integration of Semantic Information from Speech and Gesture: Insights from Event-related Brain Potentials , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Candace Bourland Hick,et al.  Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[17]  Birgitta Larsby,et al.  A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[18]  Jerker Rönnberg,et al.  The Influence of Semantically Related and Unrelated Text Cues on the Intelligibility of Sentences in Noise , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[19]  N. Rönnberg Assessing cognitive spare capacity as a measure of listening effort using the Auditory Inference Span Test , 2014 .

[20]  P. Rabbitt Mild hearing loss can cause apparent memory failures which increase with age and reduce with IQ. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[21]  G. Naylor,et al.  A Taxonomy of Fatigue Concepts and Their Relation to Hearing Loss , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[22]  T. Lunner,et al.  The emergence of cognitive hearing science. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[23]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Cognitive Spare Capacity as a Window on Hearing Aid Benefit , 2013, Seminars in Hearing.

[24]  Torsten Dau,et al.  The Danish hearing in noise test , 2011, International journal of audiology.

[25]  K. Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Associations between speech understanding and auditory and visual tests of verbal working memory: effects of linguistic complexity, task, age, and hearing loss , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[26]  M. Daneman,et al.  How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Carol L Mackersie,et al.  Autonomic Nervous System Reactivity During Speech Repetition Tasks: Heart Rate Variability and Skin Conductance , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[28]  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[29]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Cognition and hearing aids. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[30]  Burkhard Maess,et al.  Adverse Listening Conditions and Memory Load Drive a Common Alpha Oscillatory Network , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  B Hagerman,et al.  Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.

[32]  Tobias Neher,et al.  Relating hearing loss and executive functions to hearing aid users' preference for, and speech recognition with, different combinations of binaural noise reduction and microphone directionality , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[33]  Jerker Rönnberg,et al.  Working memory compensates for hearing related phonological processing deficit. , 2013, Journal of communication disorders.

[34]  M. Sommers,et al.  Auditory-Visual Speech Perception and Auditory-Visual Enhancement in Normal-Hearing Younger and Older Adults , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[35]  M. Akeroyd Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[36]  Lauren Calandruccio,et al.  Increase in speech recognition due to linguistic mismatch between target and masker speech: monolingual and simultaneous bilingual performance. , 2014, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[37]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Working memory supports listening in noise for persons with hearing impairment. , 2011, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[38]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  When cognition kicks in: working memory and speech understanding in noise. , 2010, Noise & health.

[39]  T. Lunner,et al.  Working memory capacity may influence perceived effort during aided speech recognition in noise. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[40]  C. Grady The cognitive neuroscience of ageing , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Rudner,et al.  Testing Listening Effort for Speech Comprehension Using the Individuals’ Cognitive Spare Capacity , 2011, Audiology research.

[42]  B Hagerman,et al.  Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception threshold in quiet and in noise. , 1995, Scandinavian audiology.

[43]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Pupil Response as an Indication of Effortful Listening: The Influence of Sentence Intelligibility , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[44]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) recommendations for the construction of multilingual speech tests , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[45]  H. Ng Cognition in Hearing Aid Users : Memory for Everyday Speech , 2013 .

[46]  Sridhar Kalluri,et al.  Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[47]  Erin M Picou,et al.  Visual cues and listening effort: individual variability. , 2011, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[48]  T. Lunner,et al.  Cognitive spare capacity in older adults with hearing loss , 2014, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[49]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users , 2013, International journal of audiology.

[50]  Stefanie E. Kuchinsky,et al.  Speech-perception training for older adults with hearing loss impacts word recognition and effort. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[51]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Brain training: Games to do you good , 2013, Nature.

[52]  Liang Li,et al.  Delayed Stream Segregation in Older Adults: More Than Just Informational Masking , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[53]  A. Baddeley Working memory and language: an overview. , 2003, Journal of communication disorders.

[54]  James M. Kates,et al.  Working memory and intelligibility of hearing-aid processed speech , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[55]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[56]  T. Lunner,et al.  The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[57]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  V. Best,et al.  Cognitive spare capacity: evaluation data and its association with comprehension of dynamic conversations , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[59]  Simon Carlile,et al.  Costs of switching auditory spatial attention in following conversational turn-taking , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[60]  Lauren Calandruccio,et al.  Masking release due to linguistic and phonetic dissimilarity between the target and masker speech. , 2013, American journal of audiology.

[61]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL) , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[62]  Sophie K. Scott,et al.  The neural processing of masked speech , 2013, Hearing Research.

[63]  M. Sommers,et al.  Listening Effort in Younger and Older Adults: A Comparison of Auditory-Only and Auditory-Visual Presentations , 2016, Ear and Hearing.

[64]  Mary Rudner,et al.  Load and distinctness interact in working memory for lexical manual gestures , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[65]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Cortisol, Chromogranin A, and Pupillary Responses Evoked by Speech Recognition Tasks in Normally Hearing and Hard-of-Hearing Listeners: A Pilot Study , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[66]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Seeing the talker’s face supports executive processing of speech in steady state noise , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[67]  A. Surprenant,et al.  Relatively effortless listening promotes understanding and recall of medical instructions in older adults , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[68]  Lauren Calandruccio,et al.  Linguistic contributions to speech-on-speech masking for native and non-native listeners: language familiarity and semantic content. , 2012, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[69]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Hearing Loss and Perceptual Effort: Downstream Effects on Older Adults’ Memory for Speech , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[70]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Noise Reduction Improves Memory for Target Language Speech in Competing Native but Not Foreign Language Speech , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[71]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Hearing loss impacts neural alpha oscillations under adverse listening conditions , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[72]  Jessica A. Grahn,et al.  Putting brain training to the test , 2010, Nature.

[73]  T. Lunner,et al.  Memory performance on the Auditory Inference Span Test is independent of background noise type for young adults with normal hearing at high speech intelligibility , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[74]  T. Lunner,et al.  Visual information can hinder working memory processing of speech. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[75]  W. Ma,et al.  Changing concepts of working memory , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[76]  A. Stewart,et al.  Listening effort and fatigue: What exactly are we measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group ‘white paper’ , 2014, International journal of audiology.

[77]  Helen Henshaw,et al.  Auditory training can improve working memory, attention, and communication in adverse conditions for adults with hearing loss , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[78]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[79]  Carol L Mackersie,et al.  Subjective and psychophysiological indexes of listening effort in a competing-talker task. , 2011, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.