Relevance of aerosol dynamics and dustiness for personal exposure to manufactured nanoparticles

Production and handling of manufactured nanoparticles (MNP) may result in unwanted worker exposure. The size distribution and structure of MNP in the breathing zone of workers will differ from the primary MNP produced. Homogeneous coagulation, scavenging by background aerosols, and surface deposition losses are determinants of this change during transport from source to the breathing zone, and to a degree depending on the relative time scale of these processes. Modeling and experimental studies suggest that in MNP production scenarios, workers are most likely exposed to MNP agglomerates or MNP attached to other particles. Surfaces can become contaminated by MNP, which constitute potential secondary sources of airborne MNP-containing particles. Dustiness testing can provide insight into the state of agglomeration of particles released during handling of bulk MNP powder. Test results, supported by field data, suggest that the particles released from powder handling occur in distinct size modes and that the smallest mode can be expected to have a geometric mean diameter >100 nm. The dominating presence of MNP agglomerates or MNP attached to background particles in the air during production and use of MNP implies that size alone cannot, in general, be used to demonstrate presence or absence of MNP in the breathing zone of workers. The entire respirable size fraction should be assessed for risk from inhalation exposure to MNP.

[1]  William A. Heitbrink,et al.  Correlation of Tests for Material Dustiness with Worker Exposure from the Bagging of Powders , 1989 .

[2]  T. Schneider,et al.  A gas fluidization dustiness tester , 1996 .

[3]  C. M. Hammond,et al.  PROGRESS IN DUSTINESS ESTIMATION BRITISH OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE SOCIETY TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE WORKING PARTY ON DUSTINESS ESTIMATION , 1988 .

[4]  Alvin C.K. Lai,et al.  Modeling Indoor Particle Deposition from Turbulent Flow onto Smooth Surfaces , 2000 .

[5]  H. Ayer,et al.  Irritants in cigarette smoke plumes. , 1982, American journal of public health.

[6]  D M O'Brien,et al.  The application of dustiness tests to the prediction of worker dust exposure. , 1990, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[7]  Shinji Hasebe,et al.  Dispersion of aggregates of fine powder by acceleration in an air stream and its application to the evaluation of adhesion between particles , 1997 .

[8]  S. C. Parker,et al.  Free energy change of aggregation of nanoparticles , 2008 .

[9]  T. Gill,et al.  Technologies for laboratory generation of dust from geological materials. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[10]  Daniel J. Rader,et al.  Aerosol Wall Losses in Electrically Charged Chambers , 1985 .

[11]  Hermann J. Feise,et al.  Formation and Growth of Crystal Bridges in Bulk Solids , 2006 .

[12]  Peng-Chi Tsai,et al.  Dustiness test of nanopowders using a standard rotating drum with a modified sampling train , 2009 .

[13]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Evolution of nanoparticle size and mixing state near the point of emission , 2004 .

[14]  C. B. Solnordal,et al.  Characterisation of inter-particle forces within agglomerated metallurgical powders , 2008 .

[15]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Conceptual model for assessment of inhalation exposure: defining modifying factors. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[16]  Song Jin,et al.  Hyperbranched PbS and PbSe nanowires and the effect of hydrogen gas on their synthesis. , 2007, Nano letters.

[17]  Thomas Schneider,et al.  Combined single-drop and rotating drum dustiness test of fine to nanosize powders using a small drum. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[18]  Edwards,et al.  Aerosol particle transport and deaggregation phenomena in the mouth and throat. , 1997, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[19]  A. Lai.  Particle deposition indoors: a review. , 2002, Indoor air.

[20]  Per Axel Clausen,et al.  Dustiness behaviour of loose and compacted Bentonite and organoclay powders: What is the difference in exposure risk? , 2009 .

[21]  J. Barralet,et al.  Factors influencing calcium phosphate cement shelf-life. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[22]  Kikuo Okuyama,et al.  RE-ENTRAINMENT OF SMALL AGGREGATE PARTICLES FROM A PLANE SURFACE BY AIR STREAM , 1980 .

[23]  J. Isaacs,et al.  Airborne nanoparticle exposures associated with the manual handling of nanoalumina and nanosilver in fume hoods , 2009 .

[24]  Nelson Ibaseta.  Etude expérimentale et modélisation de l’émission d’aérosols ultrafins lors du déversement de poudres nanostructurées , 2007 .

[25]  Jörg Schwedes,et al.  Understanding powder caking: Predicting caking strength from individual particle contacts , 2008 .

[26]  J. Mead,et al.  CONTROL OF AIRBORNE NANOPARTICLES RELEASE DURING COMPOUNDING OF POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITES , 2008 .

[27]  W Luther,et al.  INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION OF NANOMATERIALS: CHANCES AND RISKS TECHNOLOGICAL ANALYSIS). VDI TECHNOLOGIEZENTRUM, GERMANY , 2004 .

[28]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[29]  Sylvia Bach,et al.  Determining the dustiness of powders--a comparison of three measuring devices. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[30]  Andrew D. Maynard.  Experimental Determination of Ultrafine TiO 2 Deagglomeration in a Surrogate Pulmonary Surfactant: Preliminary Results , 2002 .

[31]  E. G. Wollish,et al.  The Roche friabilator. , 1956, Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association. American Pharmaceutical Association.

[32]  Alvin C.K. Lai,et al.  Modeling particle deposition and distribution in a chamber with a two-equation Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes model , 2006 .

[33]  A. H. M. Andreasen,et al.  über das Stäubungsvermögen der Stoffe , 1939 .

[34]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  Ultrafine Particles Deposition Inside Passenger Vehicles , 2009 .

[35]  Ian Lowndes,et al.  Assessment of the dustiness and the dust liberation mechanisms of limestone quarry operations , 2007 .

[36]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Turbulent deposition and gravitational sedimentation of an aerosol in a vessel of arbitrary shape , 1981 .

[37]  Andrew D. Maynard,et al.  Development and Validation of a Simple Numerical Model for Estimating Workplace Aerosol Size Distribution Evolution Through Coagulation, Settling, and Diffusion , 2003 .

[38]  A. Lai,et al.  An Eulerian model for particle deposition under electrostatic and turbulent conditions , 2004 .

[39]  J. Gubicza,et al.  Atmospheric ageing of nanosized silicon nitride powders , 2001 .

[40]  P. Baron,et al.  Exposure to Carbon Nanotube Material: Aerosol Release During the Handling of Unrefined Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Material , 2004, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[41]  Jürgen Tomas,et al.  Adhesion of ultrafine particles—A micromechanical approach , 2007 .

[42]  Andrea R. Ferro,et al.  Resuspension of Dust Particles in a Chamber and Associated Environmental Factors , 2008 .

[43]  G. Kasper,et al.  Temporal evolution of nanoparticle aerosols in workplace exposure. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[44]  C Cowherd,et al.  Dust inhalation exposures from the handling of small volumes of powders. , 1989, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[45]  Derk H Brouwer,et al.  Size selective dustiness and exposure; simulated workplace comparisons. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.