An optimization based output power regulation in small modular reactors

Abstract Efficient controller tuning for novel designs of nuclear reactors is an ongoing research issue. An offline optimal PI regulator tuning has been accordingly addressed herein for the power control of a sodium-cooled small modular reactor. A dynamic model has been developed employing a 1-Fuel/2-Coolant (1F/2C) layout for the core and a permanent magnet dc motor as the control rod governor. A state space representation is characterized and the pertaining stability region is delineated in the ( k P , k I ) plane for the plant linearized at the nominal operating point. Upon selection of an appropriate search scope within this zone, Differential Evolution (DE) and Firefly optimization algorithms are conducted in parallel to minimize certain error-based performance measures for the closed loop system. The step response for the closed loop nonlinear plant is resorted in this regard which would yield optimal PI pairs for each performance index. The two optimization schemes are thus compared in terms of convergence behavior and it can be figured out that the DE approach outperforms the Firefly scheme in this work. A less rippled convergence regime steadily stabilized at the optimal point is inspected in the former strategy. The latter method though quickly situates at the proximity of the optimal location, experiences persistent fluctuations therein which calls for a deeper search space comprising more samples.

[1]  Jasmina L. Vujic,et al.  Small modular reactors: Simpler, safer, cheaper? , 2012 .

[2]  Iztok Fister,et al.  Parameter tuning of PID controller with reactive nature-inspired algorithms , 2016, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[3]  Derek P. Atherton,et al.  Design of stabilizing PI and PID controllers , 2006, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[4]  Yeong-Il Kim,et al.  A summary of sodium-cooled fast reactor development , 2014 .

[5]  S. Salcedo-Sanz Modern meta-heuristics based on nonlinear physics processes: A review of models and design procedures , 2016 .

[6]  D. Wade,et al.  The Integral Fast Reactor Concept: Physics of Operation and Safety , 1988 .

[7]  Dillip Kumar Mohanty,et al.  Application of firefly algorithm for design optimization of a shell and tube heat exchanger from economic point of view , 2016 .

[8]  Kazimierz Duzinkiewicz,et al.  Nodal models of Pressurized Water Reactor core for control purposes – A comparison study , 2017 .

[9]  Arpan Kumar Kar,et al.  Bio inspired computing - A review of algorithms and scope of applications , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  He-sheng Tang,et al.  Differential evolution strategy for structural system identification , 2008 .

[11]  G. R. Ansarifar,et al.  Core Power Control of the fast nuclear reactors with estimation of the delayed neutron precursor density using Sliding Mode method , 2016 .

[12]  Wen Tan,et al.  Comparison of some well-known PID tuning formulas , 2006, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[13]  Bo Zhang,et al.  Modeling and control of nuclear reactor cores for electricity generation: A review of advanced technologies , 2016 .

[14]  Roberto Ponciroli,et al.  Innovative Control Strategy for Fast Runback Operational Transient Applied to SMRs , 2015 .

[15]  Tariq Ali,et al.  Optimal PID controller design through swarm intelligence algorithms for sun tracking system , 2016, Appl. Math. Comput..