Involving psychological therapy stakeholders in responsible research to develop an automated feedback tool: Learnings from the XXXXXX project

[1]  M. MacLeod,et al.  Adapting patient and public involvement in patient‐oriented methods research: Reflections in a Canadian setting during COVID‐19 , 2021, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[2]  Barbara A. Barry,et al.  Patient apprehensions about the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare , 2021, npj Digital Medicine.

[3]  N. Moghaddam,et al.  The predictive value of patient, therapist, and in-session ratings of motivational factors early in remote cognitive behavioural therapy for severe health anxiety. , 2021, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[4]  A. Kesselheim,et al.  Mitigating bias in machine learning for medicine , 2021, Communications Medicine.

[5]  K. Jongsma,et al.  Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI , 2021, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[6]  Labib Syed,et al.  Public patient views of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A nominal group technique study , 2021, Digital health.

[7]  Jan A. Kors,et al.  The role of explainability in creating trustworthy artificial intelligence for health care: a comprehensive survey of the terminology, design choices, and evaluation strategies , 2020, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[8]  N. Moghaddam,et al.  PREDICTING OUTCOMES AND SUDDEN GAINS FROM INITIAL IN-SESSION INTERACTIONS DURING REMOTE COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY FOR SEVERE HEALTH ANXIETY. , 2020, Clinical psychology & psychotherapy.

[9]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Patient and public involvement in research: from tokenistic box ticking to valued team members , 2020, BMC Medicine.

[10]  Eliane Zambon Victorelli,et al.  Understanding human-data interaction: Literature review and recommendations for design , 2020, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  S. Carr.  ‘AI gone mental’: engagement and ethics in data-driven technology for mental health , 2020, Journal of mental health.

[12]  P. Lehoux,et al.  When desirability and feasibility go hand in hand: innovators’ perspectives on what is and is not responsible innovation in health , 2020, Journal of Responsible Innovation.

[13]  N. Moghaddam,et al.  Patient activation in psychotherapy interactions: Developing and validating the consultation interactions coding scheme. , 2019, Journal of clinical psychology.

[14]  Ronan Cummins,et al.  Quantifying the Association Between Psychotherapy Content and Clinical Outcomes Using Deep Learning , 2019, JAMA psychiatry.

[15]  Leo Anthony Celi,et al.  The “inconvenient truth” about AI in healthcare , 2019, npj Digital Medicine.

[16]  Mohammad Tahan,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Clinical Psychology - Current Trends , 2019 .

[17]  Tom Nadarzynski,et al.  Acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI)-led chatbot services in healthcare: A mixed-methods study , 2019, Digital health.

[18]  L. Forsythe,et al.  Evaluating patient and public involvement in research , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[19]  Peter Szolovits,et al.  Artificial intelligence, machine learning and health systems , 2018, Journal of global health.

[20]  C. Hollis,et al.  Identifying research priorities for digital technology in mental health care: results of the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership. , 2018, The lancet. Psychiatry.

[21]  M. Barkham,et al.  Therapist effects, effective therapists, and the law of variability. , 2017 .

[22]  H. Turner,et al.  Therapist drift redux: Why well-meaning clinicians fail to deliver evidence-based therapy, and how to get back on track. , 2016, Behaviour research and therapy.

[23]  Jason Whipple,et al.  Do psychotherapists improve with time and experience? A longitudinal analysis of outcomes in a clinical setting. , 2016, Journal of counseling psychology.

[24]  R. Shafran,et al.  Investigating the relationship between competence and patient outcome with CBT. , 2015, Behaviour research and therapy.

[25]  P. Moule,et al.  Developing and evaluating guidelines for patient and public involvement (PPI) in research. , 2015, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[26]  J. Stilgoe,et al.  Developing a framework for responsible innovation* , 2013, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[27]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: a retrospective , 2013 .

[28]  Y. Kyratsis,et al.  Technology adoption and implementation in organisations: comparative case studies of 12 English NHS Trusts , 2012, BMJ Open.

[29]  Frances Griffiths,et al.  The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review. , 2012, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[30]  Michiel van Oudheusden,et al.  Questioning ‘Participation’: A Critical Appraisal of its Conceptualization in a Flemish Participatory Technology Assessment , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[31]  F. Perepletchikova,et al.  On the Topic of Treatment Integrity. , 2011, Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[32]  R. V. Schomberg.  Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2011 .

[33]  J. Hibbard,et al.  Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. , 2004, Health services research.